Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Dietary intake and phthalates body burden in boys and girls

Archives of Public HealthThe official journal of the Belgian Public Health Association201573:5

DOI: 10.1186/2049-3258-73-5

Received: 1 September 2014

Accepted: 25 October 2014

Published: 9 February 2015

Abstract

Background

Phthalates are a group of environmental endocrine disruptors and have been ubiquitously applied in industrial field. Few studies had investigated how dietary intake was related with phthalate body burden in children.

To determine the relationship between phthalate body burden and dietary intake among school age children in Shanghai, China.

Methods

Four hundred and thirty schoolchildren aged 8–16 years were recruited in a cross-sectional study with 18 months follow-up in Shanghai, China during 2010–2012. Data of questionnaire-based dietary intake were collected and urinary phthalate concentrations were measured. Associations between frequency of dietary intake and phthalate metabolite concentrations were evaluated by stepwise multiple linear regression model.

Results

Positive association was found between mono-butyl phthalate and seafood, and negative associations were found between mono-butyl phthalate and dried fruits and vegetables. Egg consumption showed negative association with all di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate-related metabolites.

Conclusions

Some food types were identified to be associated with phthalate body burden and diet might be a source of phthalate exposure among Chinese schoolchildren.

Keywords

Dietary intake Phthalate metabolites Body burden Schoolchildren

Background

Phthalates are a group of environmental endocrine disruptors and have been ubiquitously applied in industrial field. They are incorporated into plastics for flexibility and durability as plasticizers [1], and can leach out during the usage of daily products. Children are more susceptible towards these toxic substances during the time windows of physical and reproductive development, since phthalates can imitate the role of biosynthetic matters and interfere with regulation of sex hormones that may lead to potential adverse health outcomes such as precocity and testicular dysgenesis syndrome [2, 3]. Recent studies also revealed the associations between phthalate exposure and higher blood pressure, increased insulin resistance, obesity, asthma and airway diseases in childhood [47]. Dietary intake has been noted as a significant route of phthalate exposure, and several daily food were associated with phthalate body burden in some countries [815]. For example, high concentrations of phthalates, especially di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), were found in daily food such as cream, fish, carcass meat, eggs and poultry [1618]. Studies in the United States indicated that DEHP and high-molecular-weight phthalate metabolites were positively associated with the consumption of poultry and meat-related food, while the metabolites of di-ethyl phthalate (DEP) were related to vegetable consumption [9, 19]. However, in developing countries where higher risk of exposure to foods contaminated by phthalates might exist, studies are still scarce in investigating how dietary intake relates with phthalate body burden in vulnerable group such as children in quantified ways. Considering the wide range of phthalate contamination in daily food and the higher risk of exposure to phthalates for children compared to for adults, this study intended to assess the phthalate body burden through dietary intake focusing on school-age children in China.

Methods

The study is a cross-sectional study among schoolchildren aged 8–16 years in Shanghai, China in 2012, aiming to determine the relationship between questionnaire-based dietary intake and urinary phthalate metabolite levels. In total, 430 students (222 boys, 208 girls) were recruited for anthropometric measures, dietary intake survey and laboratory tests.

Anthropometric measures, including body weight and standing height, were assessed by trained health workers. Data on demographics, parental information and dietary intake within last three months were collected using Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). The FFQ used was validated in Chinese population for assessing health outcomes and food consumption [20]. The questionnaire included four major food categories (primary plant food, primary animal food, processed plant food and processed animal food) and 25 subgroups of food items, especially the frequently consumed food items that the Chinese children commonly consumed. Other dietary information of whether having the frequently-reported types of food containing estrogen during critical growth periods was also included. For every food group, the respondents may choose the consumption frequency from never, 1–3 times per month, 1–2 times per week, 3–4 times per week, 5–6 times per week and every day, based on their own consumption. And scores 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were assigned to represented the corresponding frequencies. The total score was developed to quantify the total consumption of four major food categories. Spot urinary samples were collected on the day of physical examination and stored in phthalate-free container, and transferred on dry ice to the Key Lab of Public Health Safety of the Ministry of Education of China at Fudan University, Shanghai. The concentrations of six phthalate metabolites in urine were analyzed, including mono-butyl phthalate (MBP), mono-methyl phthalate (MMP), mono-ethyl phthalate (MEP), mono (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP), mono (2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (MEHHP) and mono (2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (MEOHP). Concentrations of MEHP, MEHHP and MEOHP were summed up as total concentration ΣMEHP in μg/L since they shared the same parental phthalate of DEHP. The enzymatic deconjugation of the glucuronidated metabolites, solid-phase extraction, separation were resolved by an Agilent 1100 Series high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) and detected by an API 2000 electrospray triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (ESI-MS/MS; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Levels below the limit of detection (LOD) were set by dividing the LOD by two. Analyses on concentrations of phthalate metabolites were performed on specific gravity-corrected basis recommended by Hauser et al. (Atago PAL10-S, Tokyo, Japan) [21]. Associations between frequencies of dietary intake and phthalate metabolite concentrations were evaluated by the stepwise multiple linear regression model. Because all the distributions of phthalate metabolites were highly-skewed, the analyses were performed on log-transformed basis.

Results

The summary of specific-gravity adjusted urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites were shown in Table 1. MBP had the highest geometric mean of 21.88 μg/L, while MEHP had the lowest geometric mean of 0.98 μg/L. No significant difference was found between boys and girls.
Table 1

Geometric mean (95% confidence interval) of specific-gravity adjusted urine phthalate metabolites levels (μg/L)

 

Boys (n = 222)

Girls (n = 208)

All (n = 430)

MBP

22.32 (19.47, 25.59)

21.41 (18.79, 24.39)

21.88 (19.91, 24.04)

MMP

15.56 (13.73, 17.65)

15.77 (14.26, 17.44)

15.67 (14.45, 16.98)

MEP

4.25 (3.58, 5.06)

4.01 (3.40, 4.74)

4.14 (3.67, 4.66)

MEHP

0.96 (0.82, 1.11)

1.01 (0.87, 1.19)

0.98 (0.88, 1.10)

MEHHP

9.22 (8.13, 10.45)

9.41 (8.16, 10.84)

9.31 (8.47, 10.23)

MEOHP

3.44 (3.05, 3.88)

3.60 (3.18, 4.07)

3.51 (3.22, 3.83)

∑MEHP a

14.01 (12.39, 15.83)

14.57 (12.78, 16.62)

14.28 (13.06, 15.61)

aSum of MEHP, MEHHP and MEOHP, as DEHP-related metabolites.

The coefficients in multiple linear regression model adjusted for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), parents’ average education level, parents’ smoking and alcohol consumption and other types of food intake denoted the change of log-transformed specific-gravity adjusted phthalate metabolite level with per unit increase in food frequency score. The statistically significant results were shown in Table 2. Specifically, sea food presented significantly positive association with MBP level (b = 0.089, p = 0.048), while dried fruits and vegetables showed negative association with MBP level (b = -0.130, p = 0.007). Light color vegetables had significantly negative association with MMP levels (b = -0.124, p = 0.001), and luncheon meats and processed meats had positive association with the concentration of MMP (b = 0.116, p = 0.011). MEP level only showed significantly negative association with preserved food (b = -0.161, p = 0.037). In addition, eggs showed negative association and freshwater fish had positive association, respectively, with all di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP)-related metabolites (MEHP, MEHHP, MEOHP) and their sum level (∑MEHP) (see Table 2). The negative associations of light color vegetables and lactic acid beverages, and the positive association of fresh fruits and freshwater fishes were found with secondary DEHP metabolites (MEHHP and MEOHP) and ∑MEHP levels. Besides, soft drinks showed positive associations with MEOHP and ∑MEHP levels (b = 0.098, p = 0.009; b = 0.088, p = 0.023, respectively).
Table 2

Linear regression analyses of log-transformed specific-gravity adjusted phthalate metabolites and intake frequency of daily foods

Phthalate metabolites

Food types

Crude analysis

Adjusted analysis a

B (95% CI)

p-value

B (95% CI)

p-value

MBP

-Sea food

0.105 (0.025 to 0.185)

0.010*

0.089 (0.001 to 0.176)

0.048*

-Dried fruits and vegetables

0.061 (-0.019 to 0.142)

0.135

-0.130 (-0.224 to -0.036)

0.007*

MMP

-Light color vegetable

-0.030 (-0.096 to 0.036)

0.365

-0.124 (-0.120 to -0.048)

0.001*

-Luncheon meats or processed meats

0.100 (0.030 to 0.169)

0.005*

0.116 (0.027 to 0.205)

0.011*

-Lactic acid beverages

-0.002 (-0.056 to 0.051)

0.928

-0.065 (-0.125 to -0.004)

0.038*

MEP

-Preserved food

-0.130 (-0.244 to -0.015)

0.027*

-0.161 (-0.313 to -0.010)

0.037*

MEHP

-Eggs

-0.100 (-0.187 to -0.014)

0.023*

-0.143 (-0.237 to -0.048)

0.003*

-Freshwater fish

0.081 (-0.009 to 0.172)

0.078

0.138 (0.035 to 0.241)

0.009*

-Fried food

-0.019 (-0.121 to 0.083)

0.717

-0.154 (-0.285 to -0.022)

0.022*

MEHHP

-Light color vegetable

0.023 (-0.054 to 0.100)

0.056

-0.095 (-0.175 to -0.015)

0.020*

-Fresh fruits

0.144 (0.063 to 0.225)

0.000*

0.092 (0.007 to 0.177)

0.034*

-Eggs

-0.066 (-0.141 to 0.009)

0.085

-0.091 (-0.168 to -0.015)

0.020*

-Freshwater fish

0.066 (-0.013 to 0.145)

0.100

0.119 (0.034 to 0.203)

0.006*

-Lactic acid beverages

0.030 (-0.033 to 0.093)

0.352

-0.068 (-0.131 to -0.004)

0.038*

MEOHP

-Light color vegetable

0.021 (-0.049 to 0.091)

0.556

-0.090 (-0.162 to -0.018)

0.014*

-Fresh fruits

0.145 (0.071 to 0.219)

0.000*

0.096 (0.020 to 0.173)

0.013*

-Eggs

-0.060 (-0.129 to 0.008)

0.085

-0.092 (-0.161 to -0.024)

0.008*

-Freshwater fish

0.076 (0.003 to 0.148)

0.040*

0.125 (0.049 to 0.101)

0.001*

-Soft drinks

0.135 (0.066 to 0.203)

0.000*

0.098 (0.025 to 0.171)

0.009*

-Lactic acid beverages

0.025 (-0.032 to 0.083)

0.386

-0.067 (-0.124 to -0.009)

0.023*

∑MEHP b

-Light color vegetable

0.031 (-0.042 to 0.104)

0.408

-0.085 (-0.160 to -0.010)

0.026*

-Fresh fruits

0.145 (0.069 to 0.222)

0.000*

0.091 (0.012 to 0.171)

0.024*

-Eggs

-0.069 (-0.140 to 0.003)

0.059

-0.101 (-0.172 to -0.030)

0.006*

-Freshwater fish

0.073 (-0.002 to 0.148)

0.055

0.129 (0.050 to 0.208)

0.001*

-Soft drinks

0.132 (0.061 to 0.204)

0.000*

0.088 (0.012 to 0.164)

0.023*

-Lactic acid beverages

0.030 (-0.030 to 0.090)

0.324

-0.069 (-0.129 to -0.009)

0.023*

*p < 0.05.

aAdjusted for age, gender, BMI, parents’ average education level, parents’ smoking condition, parents’ alcohol consumption, guardians who fill in the parental questionnaire, and the other 24 types of food intake.

bsum of MEHP, MEHHP and MEOHP, as DEHP-related metabolites.

Discussions and conclusions

Our study found significant associations between consumption of some types of daily food and phthalate metabolite levels in urine, indicating that dietary intake might be an important source of phthalate exposure among Chinese schoolchildren.

The results showed that metabolites of DEHP were the dominant phthalate contaminators in food, which was in line with Wormuth’s and Chen’s findings in European and Chinese general population [22, 23]. Previous studies mentioned that meat, poultry, and cream-based dairy products were the most frequently reported food with high concentrations of phthalates [9, 16, 18, 24]. However, no significant association was found with these foods in our study and the inconsistency might be attributed to different food cooking methods, e.g. in Chinese dishes, meat may lose those hidden contaminators by being cooked in a long time with high temperature. We found similar results in the relations of di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) and DEHP metabolites levels with fish and fruits consumption, which was in line with the national studies conducted in the United States [6, 9]; whereas eggs and vegetables showed negative associations with all DEHP metabolites (MEHP, MEHHP, MEOHP and ∑MEHP), which was inconsistent with previous results stating that DEHP had a high concentration in eggs and elevated phthalate concentrations in vivo [9, 18]. Positive associations were found between soft drinks and the level of DEHP secondary metabolites, indicating that soft drinks might be another source of phthalate exposure possibly due to the plastic containers [25]. Those tainted soft drinks could have big impact on children and teenagers considering the popularity of these beverages among the youth. As Serrano et al. discussed in a literature review [24], eggs, fruits, vegetables and beverages were found to contain low concentrations of phthalates and their weak effects might possibly be reduced or reversed by unexpected sources of exposure from ambient environment. Our study showed some inconsistent results with previous researches. The difference might be also due to the different dietary patterns among Chinese children who have less consumption of the foods containing fat such as cream, butter and cheese that might be a major dietary resource of lipophilic phthalates, compared to children in western countries,. On the other hand, Chinese prepared foods depend very much on flavorings and sauces while cooking, and food flavoring, such as salt, would easily contaminate food with phthalate-containing additives [26]. In this study, we only focused on schoolchildren and the results were generally consistent with or only slightly different to the results from the adults [6].

Results in our study indicated that DBP and DEHP were the main phthalate contaminators via diet compared to others. The six phthalate metabolites in our study presented different associations with different food types due to their diverse chemical properties that led to various industrial applications. However, food can be contaminated in many different pathways and the knowledge about the migration of phthalates through diet remains unclear. The general conjecture of the way how food is tainted by phthalates may be attributed to plastics used during processing, packaging, storage and transport of food [16, 27, 28]. The way of phthalate exposure could also be the intake of pharmaceuticals, herbal preparations and nutritional supplements with phthalate plasticizers like DBP and di-ethyl phthalate (DEP) in their coatings [8]. And the detected associations might partially come from other inevitable exposure sources such as air and dermal uptake, which was hard to control in observational studies [22, 23].

In a word, diet is an important source of phthalate exposures among the school-age children in Shanghai, China, and rigorous investigation on exposure route is warranted. Furthermore, studies on exposure to phthalates need thorough considerations about all possible ways with comprehensive investigation of individual behaviors and living habits, regarding the ubiquitous nature of phthalate in environment.

Abbreviations

FFQ: 

Food frequency questionnaire

MBP: 

Mono-butyl phthalate

MMP: 

Mono-methyl phthalate

MEP: 

Mono-ethyl phthalate

MEHP: 

Mono (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate

MEHHP: 

Mono (2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate

MEOHP: 

Mono (2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate

HPLC: 

High-performance liquid chromatography

LOD: 

Limit of detection

DEHP: 

Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate

DBP: 

Di-n-butyl phthalate

DEP: 

Di-ethyl phthalate.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Ethics approval for the study was granted by the School of Public Health, Fudan University (project IRB#2011-03-0280). Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 81172684) and Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau (Grant Number 12GWZX0301) financed our study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Unit of Biostatistics, Division of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet
(2)
School of Public Health, Fudan University / Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Chinese Ministry of Education

References

  1. Shea KM, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Environmental H: Pediatric exposure and potential toxicity of phthalate plasticizers.Pediatrics 2003, 111:1467–1474. 10.1542/peds.111.6.1467View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Yum T, Lee S, Kim Y: Association between precocious puberty and some endocrine disruptors in human plasma.J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 2013, 48:912–917. 10.1080/10934529.2013.762734View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Skakkebaek NE, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Main KM: Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects.Hum Reprod 2001, 16:972–978. 10.1093/humrep/16.5.972View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Trasande L, Attina TM, Sathyanarayana S, Spanier AJ, Blustein J: Race/ethnicity-specific associations of urinary phthalates with childhood body mass in a nationally representative sample.Environ Health Perspect 2013, 121:501–506.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Trasande L, Sathyanarayana S, Spanier AJ, Trachtman H, Attina TM, Urbina EM: Urinary phthalates are associated with higher blood pressure in childhood.J Pediatr 2013, 163:747–753. e741 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.03.072View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Trasande L, Spanier AJ, Sathyanarayana S, Attina TM, Blustein J: Urinary phthalates and increased insulin resistance in adolescents.Pediatrics 2013, 132:e646-e655. 10.1542/peds.2012-4022View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bornehag CG, Nanberg E: Phthalate exposure and asthma in children.Int J Androl 2010, 33:333–345. 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.01023.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Schettler T: Human exposure to phthalates via consumer products.Int J Androl 2006, 29:134–139. 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00567.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Colacino JA, Harris TR, Schecter A: Dietary intake is associated with phthalate body burden in a nationally representative sample.Environ Health Perspect 2010, 118:998–1003. 10.1289/ehp.0901712View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Fromme H, Gruber L, Schlummer M, Wolz G, Bohmer S, Angerer J, Mayer R, Liebl B, Bolte G: Intake of phthalates and di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate: results of the Integrated Exposure Assessment Survey based on duplicate diet samples and biomonitoring data.Environ Int 2007, 33:1012–1020. 10.1016/j.envint.2007.05.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Schecter A, Lorber M, Guo Y, Wu Q, Yun SH, Kannan K, Hommel M, Imran N, Hynan LS, Cheng D, Colacino JA, Birnbaum LS: Phthalate concentrations and dietary exposure from food purchased in New York State.Environ Health Perspect 2013, 121:473–494.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Martine B, Marie-Jeanne T, Cendrine D, Fabrice A, Marc C: Assessment of adult human exposure to phthalate esters in the urban centre of Paris (France).Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2013, 90:91–96. 10.1007/s00128-012-0859-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bradley EL, Burden RA, Leon I, Mortimer DN, Speck DR, Castle L: Determination of phthalate diesters in foods.Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 2013, 30:722–734. 10.1080/19440049.2013.781683View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sioen I, Fierens T, Van Holderbeke M, Geerts L, Bellemans M, De Maeyer M, Servaes K, Vanermen G, Boon PE, De Henauw S: Phthalates dietary exposure and food sources for Belgian preschool children and adults.Environ Int 2012, 48:102–108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonzalez-Castro MI, Olea-Serrano MF, Rivas-Velasco AM, Medina-Rivero E, Ordonez-Acevedo LG, De Leon-Rodriguez A: Phthalates and bisphenols migration in Mexican food cans and plastic food containers.Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2011, 86:627–631. 10.1007/s00128-011-0266-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sathyanarayana S, Alcedo G, Saelens BE, Zhou C, Dills RL, Yu J, Lanphear B: Unexpected results in a randomized dietary trial to reduce phthalate and bisphenol A exposures.J Exposure Sci Environ Epidemiol 2013, 23:378–384. 10.1038/jes.2013.9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Anne Kirstine Müller EN, Ole L: Human exposure to selected phthalates in Denmark. In Book Human exposure to selected phthalates in Denmark (Editor ed.^eds.). 1, 1 Circulation edition. City: Institute of Food Safety and Nutrition; 2003.Google Scholar
  18. Food Surveillance Information Sheet, Number 82 [http://archive.food.gov.uk/maff/archive/food/infsheet/1996/no82/82phthal.htm#ref1]
  19. Trasande L, Sathyanarayana S, Jo Messito M, SG R, Attina TM, Mendelsohn AL: Phthalates and the diets of U.S. children and adolescents.Environ Res 2013, 126:84–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Li YP, He YN, Zhai FY, Yang XG, Hu XQ, Zhao WH, Ma GS: [Comparison of assessment of food intakes by using 3 dietary survey methods].Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2006, 40:273–280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hauser R, Meeker JD, Park S, Silva MJ, Calafat AM: Temporal variability of urinary phthalate metabolite levels in men of reproductive age.Environ Health Perspect 2004, 112:1734–1740. 10.1289/ehp.7212View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Wormuth M, Scheringer M, Vollenweider M, Hungerbuhler K: What are the sources of exposure to eight frequently used phthalic acid esters in Europeans?Risk Anal 2006, 26:803–824. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00770.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chen L, Zhao Y, Li L, Chen B, Zhang Y: Exposure assessment of phthalates in non-occupational populations in China.Sci Total Environ 2012, 427–428:60–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Serrano SE, Braun J, Trasande L, Dills R, Sathyanarayana S: Phthalates and diet: a review of the food monitoring and epidemiology data.Environ Health 2014, 13:43. 10.1186/1476-069X-13-43View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Guart A, Bono-Blay F, Borrell A, Lacorte S: Migration of plasticizers phthalates, bisphenol A and alkylphenols from plastic containers and evaluation of risk.Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 2011, 28:676–685. 10.1080/19440049.2011.555845View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dirwono W, Nam YS, Park HM, Lee KB: LC-TOF/MS determination of phthalates in edible salts from food markets in Korea.Food Addit Contam Part B Surveill 2013, 6:203–208. 10.1080/19393210.2013.795194View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Tsumura Y, Ishimitsu S, Saito I, Sakai H, Kobayashi Y, Tonogai Y: Eleven phthalate esters and di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate in one-week duplicate diet samples obtained from hospitals and their estimated daily intake.Food Addit Contam 2001, 18:449–460. 10.1080/02652030117484View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Cirillo T, Fasano E, Castaldi E, Montuori P, Amodio Cocchieri R: Children's exposure to Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and dibutylphthalate plasticizers from school meals.J Agric Food Chem 2011, 59:10532–10538. 10.1021/jf2020446View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Shen et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement