Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary results of the included studies

From: Does the consumption of fruits and vegetables differ between Eastern and Western European populations? Systematic review of cross-national studies

1st author, year of publication

Unit of measurement

Sex

CEE countries

WE countries

Power

Summary: CEE compared to WE‡

Average intake, cc. or %

Range*

SD

Average intake, cc. or %

Range*

SD

1. DIETARY SURVEYS

          

FRUITS

          

Kromhout 1989 [22]§│

g/day intake

M

58.6

1.0-153.6

207.3†

132.1

21.3-310.9

178.3†

0.96

LOWER

Winkler 1992 [31]

g/day intake

M

98.0

 

145.3

101.0

 

164.3

0.05

no difference

Schroll 1996 [23]§

g/day intake

M

186.0

 

239.1†

234.0

120.0-532.5

230.2†

0.26

lower-ns

  

F

162.0

 

210.2†

208.0

135.0-399.6

202.4†

0.43

lower-ns

Karamanos 2002 [24]

g/day intake

M

293.0

 

239.1†

315.0

236.0-355.0

239.1†

0.16

no difference

  

F

303.0

 

210.2†

325.7

234.0-377.0

210.2†

0.21

lower-ns

Serra-Majem 2003 [25]§

g/day intake

M+F

137.0

 

224.7†

290.0

 

218.0†

1.00

LOWER

Petkeviciene 2009 [26]

p/month intake

M+F

20.8

 

84.3†

29.4

 

84.3†

0.12

no difference

Lixandru 2010 [3]

% eat daily

M

100.0

 

na

89.5

 

na

0.34

higher-ns

  

F

100.0

 

na

100.0

 

na

na

no difference

Paalanen 2011 [33]

% eat daily

M

14.0

2.0-31.0

na

52.3

43.0-61.0

na

1.00

LOWER

  

F

26.0

4.0-50.0

na

73.3

66.0-82.0

na

1.00

LOWER

Crispim 2011 [34]

g/day intake

M

207.0

 

176.7

197.0

163.0-228.0

175.1

0.07

no difference

  

F

226.0

 

155.7

230.5

194.0-265.0

151.1

0.05

no difference

El Ansari 2012 [35]

% eat daily

M

31.6

23.8-39.4

na

30.4

28.6-32.1

na

0.05

no difference

  

F

46.8

39.5-54.1

na

51.6

47.8-55.4

na

0.42

lower-ns

VEGETABLES

          

Kromhout 1989 [22]§│

g/day intake

M

240.0

159.0-276.0

198.2†

102.6

57.3-227

88.1†

1.00

HIGHER

Winkler 1992 [31]

g/day intake

M

126.0

 

154.8

124.0

 

154.8

0.05

no difference

Schroll 1996 [23]§

g/day intake

M

341.0

 

154.8†

288.0

82.4-461.0

128.1†

0.63

higher-ns

  

F

297.0

 

143.9†

238.0

77.0-383.0

121.0†

0.92

HIGHER

Karamanos 2002 [24]

g/day intake

M

243.0

 

154.8†

189.0

168.0-214.0

154.8†

0.96

HIGHER

  

F

291.0

 

143.9†

197.3

178.0-222.0

143.9†

1.00

HIGHER

Serra-Majem 2003 [25]§

g/day intake

M+F

288.0

 

149.4†

97.1

 

68.7†

1.00

HIGHER

Petkeviciene 2009 [26]

p/month intake

M+F

29.9

 

56.0†

29.1

 

56.0†

0.05

no difference

Lixandru 2010 [32]

g/day intake

M

287.0

 

189.4

269.9

 

108.1

0.07

no difference

  

F

258.3

 

157.9

283.3

 

125.2

0.06

no difference

Paalanen 2011 [33]

% eat daily

M

15.0

10.0-24.0

na

48.7

44.0-54.0

na

1.00

LOWER

  

F

22.3

11.0-35.0

na

70.7

69.0-72.0

na

1.00

LOWER

Crispim 2011 [34]

g/day intake

M

162.0

 

121.1

201.0

168.0-222.0

112.8

0.60

lower-ns

  

F

157.0

 

99.1

202.3

166.0-254.0

108.5

0.87

LOWER

El Ansari 2012 [35]

% eat daily

M

37.8

23.9-51.6

na

24.4

23.3-25.4

na

0.99

HIGHER

  

F

44.9

28.0-61.8

na

42.0

37.5-46.4

na

0.18

no difference

2. HEALTH BEHAVIOUR SURVEYS

          

FRUITS

          

Wardle 1997 [36]

% eat daily

M

40.0

36.0-45.0

na

42.9

23.0-78.0

na

0.43

lower-ns

  

F

65.0

59.0-74.0

na

61.1

36.2-86.0

na

0.72

higher-ns

Prattala 2007 [37]

% eat daily

M

11.0

10.0-12.0

na

18.0

 

na

1.00

LOWER

  

F

20.3

17.0-25.0

na

36.0

 

na

1.00

LOWER

EHIS 2013 [40]

% eat daily

M

52.8

39.4-66.8

na

60.6

57.9-66.0

na

1.00

LOWER

  

F

67.0

49.2-82.3

na

69.1

62.3-74.5

na

1.00

LOWER

Burisch 2014[41]

% eat daily

M+F

43.4

 

na

54.3

 

na

0.87

LOWER

VEGETABLES

          

Prattala 2009 [38]

% eat daily

M

22.5

16.1-27.5

na

32.1

24.7-39.1

na

1.00

LOWER

  

F

30.4

25.0-33.4

na

45.9

36.9-59.1

na

1.00

LOWER

EHIS 2013 [40]

% eat daily

M

54.8

44.2-71.3

na

68.6

56.0-82.7

na

1.00

LOWER

  

F

62.5

55.0-78.6

na

74.2

65.3-87.4

na

1.00

LOWER

Burisch 2014 [41]

% eat daily

M+F

49.0

 

na

60.1

 

na

0.88

LOWER

FRUITS AND VEGETABLES

          

Hall 2009 [3]

% eat >=5 p/day

M

18.1

8.0-44.5

na

22.0

 

na

0.98

LOWER

  

F

23.5

9.4-49.7

na

24.9

 

na

0.38

lower-ns

3. ANTIOXIDANT STUDIES

          

BETA CAROTENE

          

Kardinaal 1993 [29]

ug/g fatty acid

M

0.51

0.45-0.56

0.80

0.42

0.18-0.59

0.80

0.31

higher-ns

Kristenson 1997 [42]

umol/l cc.

M

0.38

 

0.20

0.51

 

0.32

0.92

LOWER

Bobak 1998 [27]

umol/l cc.

M

0.39

 

0.26†

0.77

 

0.26†

1.00

LOWER

  

F

0.52

 

0.40†

0.97

 

0.40†

1.00

LOWER

Bobak 1999 [43]

umol/l cc.**

M

0.11

 

0.08

0.20

 

0.21

1.00

LOWER

Woodside 2013 [45]

umol/l cc

M

0.25

 

0.26

0.34

0.19-0.48

0.31

1.00

LOWER

  

F

0.36

 

0.34

0.44

0.30-0.67

0.37

1.00

LOWER

VITAMIN C

          

Miere 2007 [44]

mg/day intake

M

80.3

 

54.8

106.2

 

83.4

0.77

lower-ns

  

F

88.8

 

67.9

124.4

 

94.8

1.00

LOWER

Woodside 2013 [45]

umol/l cc.

M

42.0

 

23.8

38.0

32.7-44.4

23.1

0.74

higher-ns

  

F

54.5

 

27.7

48.5

43.5-52.4

23.4

1.00

HIGHER

  1. M, Males; F, Females; p, portion; EHIS, European Health Interview Survey; na, not applicable; cc., concentration
  2. *Range of intake levels, percentages or concentrations if data was reported from more than one country or site
  3. †SD assumed from EPIC study
  4. ‡LOWER: Intake level, percentage or concentration significantly lower in CEE/FSU countries compared to data from WE, (power > 0.80); HIGHER: Intake level, percentage or concentration significantly higher in CEE/FSU countries compared to data from WE, (power > 0.80); lower-ns: Intake level, percentage or concentration lower in CEE/FSU but difference not significant (power < 0.80 and >0.20); higher-ns: Intake level, percentage or concentration higher in CEE/FSU but difference not significant (power < 0.80 and >0.20); no difference: power < 0.20
  5. §:North–south weighting was applied
  6. I:Seasonal weighting was applied
  7. **Calculated from reported data using molar mass = 537 g