Correlation of fasting and postprandial plasma glucose with HbA1c in assessing glycemic control; systematic review and meta-analysis

Table. 3 Characteristics of Studies included in meta-analysis

Studies	Type of DM	Study design	Cut off points for good glycemic control (mg/dL)			Correlation between HbA1c and
Studies	Type of DM	Study design	FPG	PPG	HbA1c (%)	FPG	PPG
Saeed, 2006	Type 2	cross sectional	120	160	7 %	0.60	0.20
Haddadihneshad et al., 2010	Type 1 & 2	cross sectional	120	160	ND	0.32	0.43
Rosediani et al., 2006	Type 2	cross sectional	110	145	7 %	0.58	0.60
Swetha et al., 2014	Type 2	cross sectional	130	180	7 %	0.74	0.76
Gupta et al., 2014	Type 2	cross sectional	120	140	6.5 %	0.68	0.62
Datta et al., 2014	Type 1 & 2	cross sectional	110	126	7 %	0.84	0.86
Avignon et al., 1997	Type 2	cross sectional	120	140	≤7.0 %	0.62	0.81
Bonora et al., 2001	Type 2	cross sectional	120	160	7 %	0.48	0.48
Shrestha et al., 2012	Type 2	cross sectional	120	200	>6.5 %	0.45	0.63
Azim et al., 2011	Type 1 & 2	cross sectional	126	200	>6.5 %	0.28	0.44
Saiedullah et al., 2013	Type 2	cross section	ND	ND	ND	0.81	0.77

DM diabetes mellitus, ND cut off value not defined, HbA1c glycated hemoglobin, FBS fasting plasma glucose, PPBS postprandial plasma glucose

ISSN: 2049-3258