Skip to main content

Table 4 Association between self-perceived poor health and social. physical and safety environment variables. men according to educational level. Chile 2016

From: Social inequalities in self-perceived health in Chile, does the urban environment matter?: a cross-sectional study

    

Model 1

  

Model 2

  

Model 3

  

Model 4

 
   

Men

Men with low educational level

Men with medium/high educational level

Men

Men with low educational level

Men with medium/high educational level

Men

Men with low educational level

Men with medium/high educational level

Men

Men with low educational level

Men with medium/high educational level

   

PR (95%CI)

PR (95%CI)

PR (95%CI)

PR (95%CI)

PR (95%CI)

PR (95%CI)

PR (95%CI)

PR (95%CI)

PR (95%CI)

PR (95%CI)

PR (95%CI)

PR (95%CI)

Social Environment

Sense of Belonging to the neighborhood

Agree

1

1

1

1

1

1

   

1

1

1

Neither Agree nor Disagree

1.1 (0.8–1.5)

1.3 (0.8–2.2)

0.9 (0.7–1.3)

1.0 (0.7–1.3)

1 (0.6–1.7)

0.9 (0.6–1.2)

   

0.9 (0.6–1.2)

1.0 (0.6–1.7)

0.8 (0.6–1.2)

Disagree

2.3 (1.5–3.4)

2.1 (1.1-4.0)

2.3 (1.5–3.6)

2.0 (1.4–2.8)

1.8 (0.9–3.5)

2.2 (1.5–3.1)

   

1.7 (1.2–2.4)

1.7 (0.9–3.4)

1.7 (1.2–2.5)

Perception of Support Networks

Agree

1

1

1

1

1

1

   

1

1

1

Neither Agree nor Disagree

1.3 (1.1–1.6)

1.6 (0.9–2.9)

1.2 (1.0-1.4)

1.3 (1.2–1.5)

1.7 (1.0-2.7)

1.1 (0.9–1.3)

   

1.3 (1.1–1.5)

1.6 (0.9–2.9)

1.1 (0.8–1.4)

Disagree

1.6 (1.1–2.3)

1.7 (1.2–2.4)

1.4 (0.8–2.5)

1.3 (1.0-1.8)

1.4 (0.9–2.1)

1.2 (0.8–1.9)

   

1.2 (0.9–1.7)

1.4 (0.9–2.2)

1.1 (0.6–1.8)

Egotropic Participation

Yes participates

1

1

1

1

1

1

   

1

1

1

Does not participate

1.1 (0.8–1.5)

1.2 (1.0-1.4)

1.1 (0.8–1.6)

1.0 (0.8–1.4)

1.0 (0.8–1.3)

1.0 (0.7–1.5)

   

1.0 (0.8–1.4)

1.0 (0.8–1.2)

1.0 (0.7–1.5)

Sociotropic Participation

Yes participates

1

1

1

1

1

1

   

1

1

1

Does not participate

1.2 (0.9–1.6)

1.2 (0.6–2.2)

1.2 (0.9–1.5)

1.1 (0.9–1.4)

1.2 (0.6–2.1)

1.1 (0.8–1.4)

   

1.1 (0.8–1.3)

1.1 (0.6–2.1)

1.0 (0.8–1.3)

Religious Participation

Yes participates

1

1

1

1

1

1

   

1

1

1

Does not participate

1.0 (0.7–1.6)

0.9 (0.4–1.9)

1.2 (0.7–2.1)

1.0 (0.7–1.5)

1.0 (0.6–1.9)

1.2 (0.7–1.9)

   

1.1 (0.8–1.7)

1.1 (0.6-2.0)

1.3 (0.8–2.2)

Physical Environment

Perception of problems with Quality of public space

No problem

1

1

1

   

1

1

1

1

1

1

Yes Problem

1.3 (1.0-1.6)

1.2 (0.9–1.5)

1.2 (0.9–1.7)

   

1.0 (0.7–1.4)

1.1 (0.8–1.5)

1.0 (0.5–1.7)

0.9 (0.7–1.3)

1.1 (0.8–1.5)

0.9 (0.5–1.5)

Perception of pollution problems in the environment

No problem

1

1

1

   

1

1

1

1

1

1

Yes Problem

1.5 (1.3–1.7)

1.4 (0.8–2.2)

1.4 (1.2–1.7)

   

1.3 (1.1–1.6)

1.3 (0.8–2.2)

1.2 (1.0-1.5)

1.2 (1.0-1.5)

1.2 (0.7–2.2)

1.1 (0.8–1.4)

Perception of problem of infrastructure availability in the neighborhood

No problem

1

1

1

   

1

1

1

1

1

1

Yes Problem

1.5 (1.2–1.9)

1.1 (0.9–1.4)

1.7 (1.2–2.4)

   

1.4 (1.0–2.0)

1.0 (0.7–1.4)

1.6 (0.9-3.0)

1.4 (1.0-1.8)

0.9 (0.6–1.4)

1.6 (0.9–2.9)

Safety

Perceived safety in the neighborhood

Safe

1

1

1

      

1

1

1

Somewhat safe

1.6 (1.2–2.1)

1.4 (0.9–2.3)

1.6 (1.1–2.3)

      

1.5 (1.1–1.9)

1.2 (0.7–2.2)

1.6 (1.1–2.2)

Unsafe

2.2 (1.8–2.6)

1.5 (0.8–2.6)

2.4 (2.0-2.8)

      

1.8 (1.5–2.1)

1.1 (0.6–2.3)

2.1 (1.8–2.4)

  1. PR = Prevalence ratios
  2. 95%CI = 95% confidence intervals
  3. Models 1: Different models with the bivariate association between each explanatory variable and poor self-rated health
  4. Model 2: Multivariate association between economic resources variables and poor self-rated health
  5. Model 3: Multivariate association between economic resources variables. social support and poor self-rated health
  6. Model 4: Multivariate association between all explanatory variables and poor self-rated health