Skip to main content

Table 2 Multiple linear regression analysis for the relationship between lean body mass, visceral fat mass and lean body mass to visceral fat ratio with bone mineral density in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011–2018

From: Association between lean body mass to visceral fat mass ratio and bone mineral density in United States population: a cross-sectional study

Independent variables

Crude Model

R2

Model I

R2

Model II

R2

β (95%CI)

P-value

β (95%CI)

P-value

β (95%CI)

P-value

Total lean mass

         

Per-SD increase

0.050 (0.048, 0.052)

< 0.001

0.218

0.047 (0.045, 0.049)

< 0.001

0.252

0.078 (0.074, 0.082)

< 0.001

0.302

Q1

Reference

  

Reference

  

Reference

  

Q2

0.048 (0.043, 0.053)

< 0.001

0.200

0.043 (0.037, 0.048)

< 0.001

0.235

0.050 (0.044, 0.056)

< 0.001

0.269

Q3

0.081 (0.076, 0.086)

< 0.001

0.071 (0.065, 0.077)

< 0.001

0.086 (0.079, 0.094)

< 0.001

Q4

0.129 (0.124, 0.134)

< 0.001

0.117 (0.111, 0.124)

< 0.001

0.138 (0.129, 0.148)

< 0.001

P for trend

< 0.001

  

< 0.001

  

< 0.001

  

Visceral fat mass

         

Per-SD increase

-0.001 (-0.003, 0.000)

0.128

0.001

-0.001 (-0.003, 0.001)

0.377

0.149

-0.027 (-0.030, -0.024)

< 0.001

0.237

Q1

Reference

  

Reference

  

Reference

  

Q2

0.005 (-0.001, 0.010)

0.099

0.002

0.002 (-0.004, 0.007)

0.552

0.150

-0.021 (-0.026, -0.015)

< 0.001

0.234

Q3

0.007 (0.002, 0.013)

0.011

0.007 (0.002, 0.013)

0.013

-0.032 (-0.038, -0.025)

< 0.001

Q4

-0.005 (-0.011, 0.000)

0.062

-0.004 (-0.010, 0.002)

0.203

-0.065 (-0.072, -0.057)

< 0.001

P for trend

< 0.001

  

0.151

  

< 0.001

  

LogLM/VFM

         

Per-SD increase

0.022 (0.020, 0.024)

< 0.001

0.041

0.016 (0.014, 0.018)

< 0.001

0.164

0.034 (0.032, 0.037)

< 0.001

0.260

Q1

Reference

  

Reference

  

Reference

  

Q2

0.038 (0.032, 0.043)

< 0.001

0.046

0.025 (0.020, 0.030)

< 0.001

0.163

0.036 (0.032, 0.042)

< 0.001

0.253

Q3

0.049 (0.044, 0.054)

< 0.001

0.032 (0.027, 0.038)

< 0.001

0.056 (0.050, 0.062)

< 0.001

Q4

0.060 (0.054, 0.065)

< 0.001

0.041 (0.035, 0.047)

< 0.001

0.084 (0.076, 0.091)

< 0.001

P for trend

< 0.001

  

< 0.001

  

< 0.001

  
  1. Abbreviations: BMD bone mineral density, β partial regression coefficient, CI confidence interval, LM/VFM Lean body mass/Visceral fat mass
  2. Crude Model: no covariates were adjusted. Model 1: gender, age and race were adjusted. Model 2: gender, age, marital status, race, education, PIR, BMI, activity, MET scores, smoking, alcohol, hypertension, diabetes, thyroid disease, serum vitamin D, total cholesterol, alanine aminotransferase, total calcium, serum uric acid, vitamin D intake, vitamin D supplements, calcium intake, and calcium supplements