Skip to main content

Table 3 The impact of frequency of informal caregiving on caregivers’ subjective well-being in the China family panel studies 2016, 2018,2020

From: Impact of informal caregiving on caregivers’ subjective well-being in China: a longitudinal study

Variables

Subjective wellbeing

Ordered logit

Fixed effects Ologit

Mixed effects Ologit

Low-frequency of care

0.940* (0.030)

0.974** (0.012)

0.954** (0.023)

High-frequency of care

0.769*** (0.038)

0.806** (0.088)

0.782*** (0.031)

Age

0.994*** (0.001)

0.906 (0.104)

0.995*** (0.001)

Female

0.958 (0.033)

N.A.

0.963 (0.034)

Married

1.734*** (0.066)

1.906*** (0.336)

1.592*** (0.037)

Urban

0.953 (0.028)

1.042 (0.189)

0.926 (0.028)

Medical insurance

1.094** (0.050)

1.190 (0.152)

1.118** (0.045)

Secondary school

0.730*** (0.025)

0.641 (0.211)

0.737*** (0.033)

College and above

0.756*** (0.034)

0.417 (0.470)

0.790*** (0.043)

Working status

1.000 (0.041)

1.022 (0.137)

1.004 (0.040)

Log of income per capita

1.006 (0.004)

1.004 (0.012)

1.006 (0.004)

Chronic diseases

0.616*** (0.028)

0.739*** (0.093)

0.519*** (0.046)

Smoking

0.847*** (0.030)

0.657*** (0.105)

0.840*** (0.035)

Drinking

1.017 (0.041)

0.861 (0.110)

1.031 (0.040)

Living with parents

0.974 (0.071)

0.974 (0.227)

0.972 (0.069)

Having children

0.582 (0.416)

0.828 (0.962)

0.536 (0.715)

Household size

1.040*** (0.007)

1.073** (0.037)

1.025*** (0.007)

One of the parents still alive

0.948 (0.033)

0.886 (0.119)

0.936 (0.052)

Pseudo R2

0.022

0.030

-

Observations

19,264

19,264

19,264

  1. Note: *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1. Odds Ratio are reported and robust standard errors are in brackets. These models controlled for the dummy variables of year and province