Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Mapping EQ-5D utilities to GBD 2010 and GBD 2013 disability weights: results of two pilot studies in Belgium

  • C. Maertens de Noordhout1Email author,
  • B. Devleesschauwer2,
  • L. Gielens1,
  • M. H. D. Plasmans3,
  • J. A. Haagsma4, 5 and
  • N. Speybroeck1
Archives of Public HealthThe official journal of the Belgian Public Health Association201775:6

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-017-0174-z

Received: 12 October 2016

Accepted: 3 January 2017

Published: 6 February 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Oct 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jurgen Schmidt
29 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Edmond Ng
7 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Charline Maertens de Noordhout
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jurgen Schmidt
3 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Edmond Ng
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
3 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
6 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13690-017-0174-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université catholique de Louvain Clos Chapelle-aux-Champs
(2)
Department of Public Health and Surveillance, Scientific Institute of Public Health
(3)
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Health and Society
(4)
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC
(5)
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington

Advertisement