EFSA’s toxicological assessment of aspartame: was it even-handedly trying to identify possible unreliable positives and unreliable negatives?
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|6 Jan 2019||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Feb 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Kundi|
|7 Mar 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lisa Lefferts|
|11 Mar 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Olwenn Martin|
|18 Apr 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Erik Millstone|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Apr 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 May 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Olwenn Martin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 May 2019||Editorially accepted|
|15 Jul 2019||Article published||10.1186/s13690-019-0355-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.