Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary characteristics of studies in the meta-analysis to show the prevalence Gestational diabetes mellitus in Africa, 2013–2018

From: Prevalence and determinants of gestational diabetes mellitus in Africa based on the updated international diagnostic criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis

S.N

Author, year of publication

(Year study conducted or year of survey)

Country, Sub region

Study design

Sample size

Response rate

Mean age (SD)/range

GA when tested GDM(week)

Screening criteria

Test approach

Blood glucose levels were measured by

Prevalence of GDM

(95% CI)

1

Niyibizi et al., 2016 [13]

(2012)

Rwanda, East Africa

Institution-based cross-sectional

96

100%

M = 27 ± 9.8

R = 21–45

24–28

Universal

One step

Glucometer (ACCU-CHECK-Aviva Plus) + laboratory glucose Oxidase method)

8.3% (2.78,13.82)

2

Sagheer and Hamdi, 2018 [56] (2015)

Egypt, North Africa

Institution-based Cross-sectional

700

89.7%

M = 26.5 ± 5.5

R = 18–42

24–28

Universal

One step

Laboratory method

7.43% (5.49,9.37)

3

Ogoudjobi et al., 2017 [44] (2015–2017)

Benin, West Africa

Institution-based

cross-sectional

967

100%

M = 28.5 ± 5.7

R = 16–44

24–28

Universal

One step

Laboratory glucose oxidase method

7.5% (5.84.9.16)

4

Oppong et al., 2015 [45](2013)

Ghana, West Africa

Institution-based cross-sectional

399

100%

NR

24–28

Universal

One step

Laboratory method

9.3% (6.45,12.15)

5

Oriji et al., 2017 [41] (2015)

Nigeria, West Africa

Institution-based cross-sectional

235

94%

NR

24–28

Universal

One step

Laboratory glucose oxidase method

14.9% (10.35,19.45)

6

Agbozo et al., 2018 [39] (2016)

Ghana, West Africa

Institution-based Prospective study

435

88.6%

R = 15–54

13–34

Selective (13th–20th)

Universal (20th -34th)

One step

NR

9.0% (6.3, 11.69)

7

Nakabuye et al., 2017 [47] (2014)

Uganda, East Africa

Prospective cohort study

251

75.4%

NR

24–36

Universal

One step

Glucose meter (Glucocard™ Σ1070)

30.3% (24.61,35.99)

8

Macaulay et al., 2018 [54]

2013–2017

South African, Southern Africa

Institution-based cross-sectional

1906

94.8%

M = 30

R = 25–35

24–28

Universal

One step

Glucometer(ACCU-CHEK)

9.1% (7.81, 10.39)

9

Abbey and Kasso, 2018 [40]

(2016–2017)

Nigeria, West Africa

cross-sectional study

288

> 100%

M = 31.18 ±

4.7

< 14 weeks

Universal

One step

Laboratory glucose oxidase method

21.2% (16.48, 25.92)

10

Njete, John et al., 2018 [48]

(2015–2016)

Tanzania, East Africa

Cross-sectional study

333

77%

M = 27.9 ± 5.9

24–28

Universal

One step

Plasma-calibrated hand-held glucometers (GlucoPlus)

19.5% (15.24,23.76)

11

Pastakia et al., 2017 [49]

(2013–2015)

Kenya, East Africa

Prospective study

616

71.1%

M = 26.1

24–32

Universal

Two step

Laboratory method and POC tests

2.9% (1.57,4.23)

12

Olagbuji et al., 2017 [42]

(2015–2016)

Nigeria, West Africa

Institution-based prospective cohort study

280

NR

R = 18–45

24–32

Universal

Two step

Laboratory glucose oxidase method

15.71% (11.45,19.97)

13

Munang et al., 2017 [51]

(2012–2013)

Cameroon, Central Africa

Institution-based prospective study

400

82%

M = 26 ± 5

24–28

Universal

Two step

Glucometer (Accu-Chek® Compact Plus)

32.1%. (27.52,36.68)

14

Jao, Wong et al., 2013 [53]

(2013??) NR

Cameroon, Central Africa

Cross Sectional study

316

NR

R = 15–50

24–28

Universal

One step

NR

6.3% (3.62,8.98)

15

Djomhou et al., 2016 [52]

(2013)

Cameroon, Central Africa

Institution-based prospective cohort study

100

100%

M = 27 ± 6

All GA

Universal

NR

Laboratory method

22% (13.88,30.12)

16

Olagbuji et al., 2015 [17]

(2012–2014)

Nigeria, West Africa

Institution-based prospective study

1059

81.7%

M = 30.7 ± 4.4

24–32

Universal

one-step

Laboratory glucose oxidase method

8.6% (6.91,10.29)

17

Ogu et al., 2017 [43]

(2014–2015)

Nigeria, West Africa

Institution-based cross-sectional

837

NR

M = 30.67 ± 4.55

R = 18–48 years

NR

Selective

NR

NR

3.3% (2.09, 4.51)

18

Khalil et al., 2017 [57]

(2015–2016)

Egypt, North Africa

Institution-based Cross sectional

250

100%

NR

24–28

Universal

Two step

Laboratory glucose oxidase method

8%. (4.64, 11.36)

19

Adams and Rheeder, 2017 [15]

(2012??) NR

South Africa, Southern Africa

Prospective cohort study

554

55.4%

M = 27.2 ± 5.8

24–28

Universal

One step

Laboratory method + POC test

25.8% (22.16, 29.44)

20

Adoyo et al., 2016 [50]

(2015)

Kenya, East Africa

Cohort study design

238

93.7

M = 33.06 (GDM) & 27.9 (Non GDM)

≥28

NR

NR

NR

27.73% (22.04,33.42)

21

Mwanri et al., 2013 [11] (2011–2012)

Tanzania,

East Africa

cross-sectional study

910

NR

M = 27.5(5.0)

Urban &

M = 26.6 (5.3) Rural

≥20 Weeks

Universal

One step

POC (HemoCue Glucose B-201)

13.1% (10.91, 15.29)

22

Asare-Anane et al. 2014 [46]

2010.

Ghana

West Afrcia

Case control

200

100

NR

All GA

Universal

NR

NR

NA

23

Mathilda et al., 2017 [55]

(2010–20140

Zimbabwe. Southern Africa

Institution-based cross-sectional

532

100%

M = 26.9 ± 6.7

All GA

NR

NR

Laboratory method

8.5 (6.13, 10.87)

  1. GDM Gestational diabetes mellitus, M mean, R Range, SD Standard deviation, NR Not Reported, GA Gestational Age, POC Point of care, NA Not Applicable