Skip to main content

Table 1 Mean ratings, Standard Deviations and ‘Yes’ percentages for single item GAP-IQ Fidelity ratings

From: File audit to assess sustained fidelity to a recovery and wellbeing oriented mental health service model: an Australian case study

GAP-IQ Assessment2011
N = 146
2014
N = 116
% YesMSD% YesMSD
1. Overall recovery vision11.00.51.6973.3**1.65.64**
2. Collaboration between consumer and worker79.51.60.8295.7**1.91.41**
3. Goal description30.81.18.6477.6**1.66.67**
4. Goal Importance21.9.48.8346.6**.97.99**
5. Goal Confidence4.1.21.5085.3**1.72.68**
6. Timeframe for goals3.4.31.5411.2**.28.66
7. Level of goal attainment13.0.41.7154.3**1.36.77**
8. Identified barriers/ solutions12.3.70.6859.5**1.34.86**
9. Social support6.2.72.5855.2**1.32.83**
10. Monitoring16.6.59.7642.2**1.16.82**
11. Action plans for goals31.71.10.7356.0**1.38.78**
12. Action description39.71.17.7868.1**1.51.78**
13. Action how often specified26.0.78.8469.0**1.43.88**
14. Action when specified21.2.67.8150.9**1.21.88**
15. Action where specified24.0.77.8169.8**1.42.90**
16. Action confidence rating32.2.68.9366.4**1.39.89**
17. Action plan review19.2.53.8025.0.60.87
Total score 7.5012.39 22.329.92a
  1. Note: Excluding the Total Score, Mean scores closer to 2 reflect greater fidelity to the CRM
  2. at(60) = − 10.39, ** p < .001. ** Chi-square significant at p < .001 level