Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate tests comparing the theory of planned behavior (TPB) constructs between participants with (n = 100) and without (n = 462) previous experience of vehicle-collision from a cross-sectional study of young pedestrians’ risky road crossing behaviors, Tehran, Iran (2018)

From: Still careless: findings from a cross-sectional study of young pedestrians’ risky road crossing behaviors

 

Unadjusted

Adjusted

Variables

Experience of vehicle-collision

Mean (SD)

Mean Difference (95% CI)

Univariate P-value $

Multivariate P-value #

Univariate P-value $$

Multivariate P-value ##

Perceived risk

Yes

48.18 (23.35)

−5.76 (−10.92 to −0.61)

0.028

0.007

0.027

0.039

No

53.94 (23.87)

   

Perceived severity

Yes

80.10 (19.51)

−6.08 (−9.50 to −2.66)

0.001

0.003

No

86.18 (14.85)

   

Perceived behavioral control

Yes

62.71 (17.29)

−5.20 (−8.88 to −1.53)

0.006

0.018

No

67.91 (16.87)

   

Subjective norms

Yes

60.98 (23.07)

−4.53 (−9.21 to 0.15)

0.058

0.89

No

65.51 (21.27)

   

Behavioral intention

Yes

57.46 (20.43)

−5.35 (−9.98 to −0.71)

0.024

0.046

No

62.81 (21.60)

   

Attitude toward behavior

Yes

59.66 (23.50)

−7.56 (−12.35 to −2.77)

0.002

0.005

No

67.22 (21.81)

   

Attitude toward traffic regulations

Yes

66.95 (16.28)

−6.34 (−9.94 to −2.73)

0.001

0.006

No

73.29 (16.72)

   

Road crossing behavior in potential risky situations

Yes

65.19 (16.61)

−5.37 (−8.62 to −2.12)

0.001

0.004

No

70.56 (14.65)

   
  1. #: Multivariate Hoteling T2 Tests based on Wilks’ Lambda
  2. ##: Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) based on Wilks’ Lambda adjusting for sex and education
  3. $: Univariate Independent t-test
  4. $$: Univariate ANCOVA adjusting for sex and education
  5. Higher score indicates better condition