Table 3 Multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify associated factor of SRH service utilization in South Ari district, March 2019 (n = 426)

YFS implementation status

YFS non- implemented

192 (90.1%)

21 (9.9%)

1

1

YFS implemented

141 (66.2%)

72 (33.8%)

4.66 [2.74,7.95]

4.07 [6 2.150, 7.727]

.001

Grade of education

Grade 9

125 (82.8%)

26 (17.2%)

1

1

Grade 10

101 (71.6%)

40 (28.4%)

1.94 [1.089,3.33]

2.21 [1.070,4.591]

0.032

Grade 11

55 (75.3%)

18 (24.7%)

1.57 [0.79,3.10]

1.80[.737,4.428]

0.196

Grade 12

52 (85.2%)

9 (14.8%)

0.83 [0.365,1.89]

.92 [.329, 2.565]

0.870

Mother’s educational status

No formal education

166 (87.4%)

24 (12.6%)

1

1

0.028

Primary education

109 (75.7%)

35 (24.3%)

2.22 [1.25,3.93]

2.069 [1.021,4.191]

0.044

secondary education and above

58 (63.0%)

34 (37.0%)

4.05 [2.22,7.40]

2.588 [1.220, 5.491]

0.013

Discussion on SRH issue with family members

Yes

42 (48.8%)

44 (51.2%)

6.22 [3.69,10.46]

3.17 [1.624, 6.206]

0.001

No

291 (85.6%)

49 (14.4%)

1

1

Perceived health status

Very good

84 (73.7%)

30 (26.3%

1

1

0.093

Good

177 (76.6%

54 (23.4%)

2.14 [0.24,18.53]

1.22 [.102, 14.643]

0.874

poor

66 (89.2%)

8 (10.8%)

1.83 [0.21,15.54]

1.18 [.102, 13.585]

0.895

Ill health

6 (85.7%)

1 (14.3%

0.72 [0.77,6.83]

.36 [.028, 4.640]

0.436

knowledge

Good

87 (57.6%)

64 (42.4%)

6.24 [3.77,10.31]

4.51 [2.458, 8.278]

.001

Poor

246 (89.5%)

29 (10.5%)

1

1

Attitude

Positive

73 (55.7%)

58 (44.3%)

5.90 [3.60,9.66]

5.08 [2.764, 9.352]

.001

Negative

260 (88.1%)

35 (11.9%)

1

1