Skip to main content

Table 5 Relationship between the effects of Cha-no-Ma participation and multigenerational exchanges

From: Factors that facilitate multigenerational exchanges in regional locations: a cross‐sectional study in Niigata City, Japan

  

All data

(excluding no answer)

Only those implementing multigenerational exchange

(excluding no answer)

   

Multigenerational exchanges found

 

3+ generation exchanges found

Effect of Cha-no-Ma

 

Number of responses

n

%

p-valuea

Number of responses

n

%

p-valuea

Increased smiling

Effect

314

96

30.6

0.500

79

59

74.7

0.045

No effect

80

28

35.0

26

14

53.8

Interest in health

Effect

275

88

32.0

0.813

74

58

78.4

0.005

No effect

118

36

30.3

31

15

48.4

Connection with the region

Effect

264

95

36.0

0.006

80

55

68.8

0.809

No effect

130

29

22.3

25

18

72.0

Prevention of isolation

Effect

252

80

31.7

0.910

67

50

74.6

0.185

No effect

142

44

31.0

38

23

60.5

Conversations with same generations

Effect

232

77

33.2

0.442

67

47

70.1

1.000

No effect

162

47

29.0

38

26

68.4

Watch over

Effect

194

70

36.1

0.440

59

45

76.3

0.134

No effect

200

54

27.0

46

28

60.9

Improved physical function

Effect

133

46

34.6

0.360

37

29

78.4

0.185

No effect

261

78

29.9

68

44

69.7

Attend alone

Effect

132

47

35.6

0.250

37

26

70.3

1.000

No effect

262

77

29.4

68

47

69.1

Improved cognitive function

Effect

99

27

27.3

0.319

21

19

90.5

0.019

No effect

295

97

32.9

84

54

64.3

Conversations with different generations

Effect

96

42

43.8

0.004

39

33

84.6

0.015

No effect

298

82

27.5

66

40

60.6

Meal support

Effect

57

18

31.6

1.000

14

9

64.3

0.756

No effect

337

106

31.5

91

64

70.3

Read newspapers or magazines

Effect

9

3

33.3

1.000

3

3

100.0

0.551

No effect

385

121

31.4

102

70

68.6

  1. a Fisher’s exact test