Archives of Public Health

Table 3 Associations between labels and change in nutritional quality of food choices, by label and food category in participants who made a choice^a: Comparison study of the relevance of Nutri-Score and other nutritional labels on the front of the packaging. Morocco (2019)

From: Comparison of appropriateness of Nutri-Score and other front-of-pack nutrition labels across a group of Moroccan consumers: awareness, understanding and food choices

Product choice
Yoghurt	OR	95% CI	P-value
Health warning	0.47	0.27, 0.80	0.006
Nutriscore	1.05	0.63, 1.75	0.8
Health star rating	0.75	0.46, 1.24	0.3
Multiple Traffic Light	0.76	0.46, 1.27	0.3
Cold cuts
Health warning	0.66	0.36, 1.18	0.2
Nutriscore	1.07	0.60, 1.88	0.8
Health star rating	1.14	0.66, 1.98	0.6
Multiple Traffic Light	0.94	0.54, 1.64	0.8
Biscuits
Health warning	0.65	0.35, 1.20	0.2
Nutriscore	0.86	0.50, 1.51	0.6
Health star rating	0.77	0.43, 1.39	0.4
Multiple Traffic Light	0.62	0.35, 1.12	0.12
All products
Health warning	0.55	0.29, 1.06	0.072
Nutriscore	0.97	0.53, 1.78	> 0.9
Health star rating	1.01	0.55, 1.86	> 0.9
Multiple Traffic Light	0.65	0.35, 1.19	0.2

^a The reference for multivariate ordinal logistic regression was the “Reference Intakes” label. The multivariate model was adjusted for gender, place of residence, marital status, age, level of education, level of income, occupation, responsibility for shopping. OR: Odds Ratio; CI: confidence interval

Back to article page

ISSN: 2049-3258

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com