Skip to main content

Table 3 Lipid profile status of the respondents by sex

From: Prevalence and associated factors of dyslipidaemia among university workers in Southeast Nigeria: a cross-sectional study

 

Male

Female

Total

 

Variables

N(%)

N(%)

N(%)

p valuea

Total cholesterol (mg/dl)

  Desirable (< 200)

20(80.0)

34(65.4)

54(70.1)

 

  Borderline high (200–239)

5(20.0)

13(25.0)

18(23.4)

 

  High (≥ 240)

0(0.0)

5(9.6)

5(6.5)

0.212

Total

25(100.0)

52(100.0)

77(100.0)

 

HDL-c (mg/dl)

  Low (< 40)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

 

  Borderline (40–59)

0(0.0)

1(1.9)

1(1.3)

 

  Desirable (≥ 60)

25(100.0)

51(98.1)

76(98.7)

 

Total

25(100.0)

52(100.0)

77(100.0)

1.000

LDL-c (mg/dl)

  Optimal (< 100)

10(40.0)

24(46.2)

34(44.2)

 

  Above optimal (100–129)

12(48.0)

19(36.5)

31(40.3)

 

  Borderline high (130–159)

2(8.0)

9(17.3)

11(14.3)

 

  High (160–189)

1(4.0)

0(0.0)

1(1.3)

0.284

Total

25(100.0)

52(100.0)

77(100.0)

 

Triglyceride (mg/dl)

  Normal (< 150)

18(72.0)

47(90.4)

65(84.4)

 

  Borderline high (150–199)

5(20.0)

4(7.7)

9(11.7)

 

  High (200–499)

2(8.0)

1(1.9)

3(3.9)

0.302

Total

25(100.0)

52(100.0)

77(100.0)

 

Atherogenic index of plasma

  Low cardiovascular risk (< 0.11)

21 (84.0)

40 (76.9)

61 (79.2)

 

  Intermediate cardiovascular risk (0.11–0.21)

4 (16.0)

12(23.1)

16 (20.8)

 

  High cardiovascular risk (> 0.21)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0.485

Total

25 (100.0)

52(100.0)

77(100.0)

 

Fasting blood glucose (FBG)

  Normal (65-<110 mg/dl)

24(96.0)

51(98.1)

75(97.4)

 

  Impaired FBG (110-125 mg/dl)

1(4.0)

1(1.9)

2(2.6)

 

  Diabetes mellitus (≥ 126 mg/dl)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0.547

Total

25(100.0)

52(100.0)

77(100.0)

 
  1. aValues were generated through chi square analysis *P < 0.05
  2. HDL-c High density lipoprotein cholesterol LDL-c Low density lipoprotein cholesterol