Skip to main content

Table 3 CASP Quality Appraisal

From: Understanding the complexities of antibiotic prescribing behaviour in acute hospitals: a systematic review and meta-ethnography

Paper

Decision to retain for Phases 4–6

1. Clear research aims

2. Qualitative methodology appropriate

3. Research design

4. Recruitment strategy

5. Data Collection

6. Reflexivity

7. Ethical Issues

8. Data Analysis

9. Findings

10. Research Value

R1

R2

R1

R2

R1

R2

R1

R2

R1

R1

R1

R2

R1

R2

R1

R2

R1

R2

R1

R2

Almatar et a.l 2014 [29]

✘

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

P

Yes

P

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

U

U

Yes

Yes

P

Yes

Almatar 2015 [30]

✘

This is a thesis and is a copy of the above study [29].

Barlow et al. 2008 [31]

✘

P

P

P

Yes

P

P

Yes

Yes

P

Yes

No

No

P

P

No

No

P

Yes

P

P

Cortoos et al. 2008 [32]

✓

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

P

P

P

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Bjorkman et al. 2010 [33]

✓

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

P

P

P

P

P

Yes

P

P

Broom et al. 2014 [34]

✓

P

P

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

P

P

P

P

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Mattick et al. 2014 [35]

✓

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

P

P

P

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

May et al. 2014 [36]

✓

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

P

Yes

Yes

Yes

P

P

No

No

P

P

U

U

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Livorsi et al. 2015 [37]

✓

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

P

Yes

P

P

Yes

Yes

No

P

P

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

P

Yes

Livorsi et al. 2016 [38]

✓

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Skodvin et al. 2015 [39]

✓

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

P

P

Yes

P

Yes

Yes

Yes

P

P

Broom et al. 2016a [40]

✓

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

P

P

Yes

Yes

P

P

P

P

P

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Broom et al. 2016b [41]

✓

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

P

P

No

P

P

P

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Broom et al. 2016c [42]

✓

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

P

P

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Eyer et al. 2016 [43]

✓

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

P

P

No

P

P

P

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Rawson et al. 2016 [44]

✓

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

P

P

Yes

Yes

P

P

Yes

P

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Broom et al. 2017 [45]

✓

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

P

P

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sedrak et al. 2017 [46]

✓

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

P

Yes

Yes

Yes

P

Yes

Yes

P

P

Yes

P

P

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

  1. Key: R1 – reviewer 1; R2 – reviewer 2
  2. Individual decisions: P: Partially, U: Unable to determine