Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive statistics of key variables, ANOVA, and multiple comparison results

From: Does descending health resources reform impact patient low-level hospital selection behavior? Evidence from Zhejiang, China

Latent variables

Measured variables

Overall

Hospital level

Information channel

Tertiary

Secondary

Primary

Public

Private

Hospital Image

X11

3.28 ± 0.98

3.29 ± 0.95

3.34 ± 1.01*,1

3.11 ± 0.87*,1

3.49 ± 0.94*,1

2.93 ± 0.95*,1

X12

2.55 ± 1.26

3.05 ± 1.40*,2

2.49 ± 1.29*,1

2.48 ± 1.06*,1

2.98 ± 1.18*,1

1.78 ± 1.02*,1

X13

2.50 ± 1.25

3.02 ± 1.46*,2

2.41 ± 1.27*,1

2.55 ± 1.02*,1

2.93 ± 1.18*,1

1.75 ± 0.99*,1

Patient expectation

X21

3.10 ± 1.10

2.96 ± 1.14

3.16 ± 1.14*,1

2.97 ± 0.96*,1

3.35 ± 1.01*,1

2.65 ± 1.11*,1

X22

3.35 ± 0.85

3.28 ± 0.90

3.41 ± 0.86*,1

3.22 ± 0.78*,1

3.48 ± 0.83*,1

3.12 ± 0.84*,1

X23

2.80 ± 0.99

2.88 ± 1.07

2.78 ± 0.99

2.80 ± 0.94

2.95 ± 1.02*,1

2.52 ± 0.86*,1

Perceived quality

X31

3.27 ± 1.00

3.29 ± 0.98

3.33 ± 1.03*,1

3.10 ± 0.92*,1

3.48 ± 0.96*,1

2.91 ± 0.97*,1

X32

3.38 ± 0.91

3.35 ± 0.94

3.37 ± 0.92

3.41 ± 0.85

3.53 ± 0.89*,1

3.10 ± 0.87*,1

Reform

policy

X41

2.36 ± 1.29

2.90 ± 1.44*,2

2.30 ± 1.32*,1

2.30 ± 1.09*,1

2.78 ± 1.27*

1.63 ± 0.96*

X42

0.64 ± 0.48

0.72 ± 0.45

0.62 ± 0.49

0.65 ± 0.48

–

–

X43

3.30 ± 0.87

2.99 ± 0.94*,2

3.35 ± 0.86*,1

3.30 ± 0.87*,1

3.46 ± 0.87*,1

3.02 ± 0.81*,1

X44

3.20 ± 0.86

2.97 ± 0.93*,2

3.25 ± 0.87*,1

3.16 ± 0.80*,1

3.34 ± 0.86*,1

2.95 ± 0.80*,1

X45

3.29 ± 0.90

3.15 ± 0.99*,1

3.35 ± 0.88*,2

3.20 ± 0.89*,1

3.41 ± 0.91*,1

3.08 ± 0.84*,1

Socio-demographics

X51

0.42 ± 0.49

0.32 ± 0.47*,1

0.45 ± 0.50*,1

0.39 ± 0.49

0.43 ± 0.50

0.40 ± 0.49

X52

2.35 ± 1.25

2.41 ± 1.11

2.34 ± 1.28

2.34 ± 1.21

2.38 ± 1.24

2.29 ± 1.26

X53

2.88 ± 1.11

3.34 ± 1.05*,2

2.81 ± 1.09*,1

2.87 ± 1.13*,1

2.89 ± 1.11

2.87 ± 1.10*

Satisfaction

ME1

2.70 ± 1.39

3.26 ± 1.49*,2

2.65 ± 1.42*,1

2.59 ± 1.19*,1

3.22 ± 1.24*,1

1.79 ± 1.15*,1

ME2

3.35 ± 0.87

3.29 ± 0.88

3.40 ± 0.88*,1

3.23 ± 0.81*,1

3.50 ± 0.84*,1

3.08 ± 0.84*,1

Loyalty

Y1

3.30 ± 0.90

3.29 ± 0.88

3.36 ± 0.91*,1

3.13 ± 0.84*,1

3.43 ± 0.89*,1

3.08 ± 0.86*,1

Y2

3.20 ± 0.96

3.42 ± 1.01*,1

3.26 ± 0.99*,1

2.94 ± 0.82*,2

3.33 ± 0.97*,1

2.97 ± 0.91*,1

Sample size

1287

1287

130

851

306

819

  1. Note: [1] Asterisks and n = 1 or 2 (*, n) denote a statistically significant difference among the different hospital groups with ANOVA (α =0.05), and the number of differences by using multiple posteriori comparison