Skip to main content

Table 7 Assessment on model fit of models 1 to 4 in Beijing, China in 2010-2011

From: Sexual and reproductive health knowledge, sexual attitudes, and sexual behaviour of university students: Findings of a Beijing-Based Survey in 2010-2011

 

χ2:df ratio

RMSEA

90% CI

pclose

CFI

TLI

SRMR

CD

Model 1a

1.553

0.022

0.000-0.040

0.997

0.995

0.992

0.020

0.747

Model 1b

8.919

0.083

0.070-0.098

0.000

0.915

0.863

0.058

0.642

Model 1c

5.207

0.061

0.052-0.071

0.019

0.926

0.899

0.054

0.911

Model 2a

1.553

0.022

0.000-0.041

0.995

0.995

0.992

0.018

0.747

Model 2b

1.600

0.023

0.000-0.041

0.995

0.994

0.990

0.017

0.670

Model 3a

8.919

0.083

0.070-0.098

0.000

0.915

0.863

0.058

0.049

Model 3b

8.919

0.083

0.070-0.098

0.000

0.915

0.863

0.058

0.049

Model 3c

2.165

0.032

0.022-0.043

0.998

0.981

0.972

0.031

0.175

Model 4a

1.553

0.022

0.000-0.041

0.995

0.995

0.992

0.018

0.039

Model 4b

1.600

0.023

0.000-0.041

0.995

0.994

0.990

0.017

0.173

  1. Note: χ2:df ratio = ratio of Chi-square to the number of free parameters, TLI Tucker-Lewis index, CFI comparative fit index, SRMR Standardized Root Mean Squared Error, RMSEA Root Mean Squared Error of Approximation, PCLOSE p of Close Fit, and CD= coefficient of determination