Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of study participants

From: Don’t change who we are but give us a chance: confronting the potential of community health worker certification for workforce recognition and exclusion

 

CHWs

N (%)

Program Managers

N (%)

Systems-level

N (%)

Number of participants

66 (100)

11 (100)

31 (100)

Type of organization

 Non-governmental organizationa

22 (33)

7 (64)

11 (36)

 Governmentb

5 (8)

1 (9)

10 (32)

 Health plan

8 (12)

1 (9)

1 (3)

 Health care providerc

17 (26)

2 (18)

3 (10)

 Academia

0 (0)

0 (0)

4 (13)

 Foundation

0 (0)

0 (0)

2 (6)

dNot defined

14 (21)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Employment

 Full-time

39 (59)

11 (100)

31 (100)

 Part-time

5 (8)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 Volunteer

8 (12)

0 (0)

0 (0)

eNot defined

14 (21)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Language of Event

 English

12 (18)

9 (82)

31 (100)

 Spanish

31 (47)

0 (0)

0 (0)

fBilingual

23 (35)

2 (18)

0 (0)

Service area

 Urban

39 (59)

7 (64)

7 (23)

 Rural

5 (8)

1 (9)

0 (0)

 Urban and rural

22 (33)

3 (27)

4 (13)

gNot defined

0 (0)

0 (0)

20 (64)

Geographic Region

 Northern California

1 (1)

1 (9)

4 (13)

 Central California

3 (5)

1 (9)

1 (4)

 Southern California

62 (94)

9 (82)

6 (19)

 Statewide

0 (0)

0 (0)

14 (45)

 National

0 (0)

0 (0)

6 (19)

  1. aNon-governmental organizations (NGOs) included community-based organizations, coalitions, and advocacy and policy organizations
  2. bGovernment included Local, state, and federal government
  3. cHealth care providers included individuals or organizations providing clinical services (e.g., federally qualified health centers, clinics, hospitals)
  4. dTwo focus groups with 14 total participants included a mixture of NGO and health care provider organizations but data were not collected to identify the type of organization for each individual participant
  5. eTwo focus groups with 14 total participants included a mixture of full-time, part-time, and volunteer CHWs but data were not collected to identify the employment status for each individual participant
  6. fWhen both English and Spanish languages were spoken during an interview or focus group, the primary language of all participants was labeled “bilingual.”
  7. gStakeholder service area was labeled “not defined” when the stakeholders or stakeholder organization did not provide direct services to a specific geographic area