Skip to main content

Table 3 Fixed and random effects analysis of the association between intimate partner violence and timely antenatal care visits in sub-Saharan Africa

From: Intimate partner violence and timely antenatal care visits in sub-Saharan Africa

Variables

Model O

Model I aOR [95% CI]

Model II aOR [95% CI]

Model III aOR [95% CI]

Fixed effects

Intimate partner violence

 No

 

Reference

 

Reference

 Yes

 

0.89*** [0.86,0.92]

 

0.89*** [0.86,0.92]

Maternal age

 15–19

 

Reference

 

Reference

 20–24

 

1.14** [1.05,1.24]

 

1.14** [1.05,1.24]

 25–29

 

1.25*** [1.14,1.37]

 

1.22*** [1.12,1.33]

 30–34

 

1.34*** [1.22,1.47]

 

1.29*** [1.17,1.42]

 35–39

 

1.36*** [1.23,1.50]

 

1.30*** [1.17,1.44]

 40–44

 

1.40*** [1.25,1.57]

 

1.35*** [1.21,1.51]

 45–49

 

1.21* [1.04,1.41]

 

1.16* [1.00,1.36]

Maternal educational level

 No education

 

Reference

 

Reference

 Primary

 

0.89*** [0.85,0.93]

 

0.93** [0.89,0.98]

 Secondary

 

0.99 [0.94,1.05]

 

0.99 [0.94,1.05]

 Higher

 

1.13* [1.02,1.26]

 

1.07 [0.96,1.20]

Marital status

 Married

 

Reference

 

Reference

 Cohabiting

 

1.13*** [1.09,1.18]

 

1.15*** [1.10,1.20]

Partner’s educational level

 No education

 

Reference

 

Reference

 Primary

 

0.84*** [0.80,0.89]

 

0.88*** [0.84,0.93]

 Secondary

 

0.93** [0.88,0.98]

 

0.93** [0.88,0.98]

 Higher

 

1.07 [0.98,1.16]

 

1.01 [0.92,1.09]

Parity

 1

 

Reference

 

Reference

 2

 

0.87*** [0.82,0.92]

 

0.87*** [0.83,0.93]

 3

 

0.83*** [0.78,0.88]

 

0.84*** [0.79,0.89]

 4 or more

 

0.68*** [0.64,0.73]

 

0.70*** [0.66,0.75]

Exposure to listening to radio

 No

 

Reference

 

Reference

 Yes

 

0.97 [0.94,1.01]

 

0.97 [0.93,1.01]

Exposure to watching television

 No

 

Reference

 

Reference

 Yes

 

1.37*** [1.31,1.43]

 

1.24*** [1.18,1.30]

Exposure to reading newspaper/magazine

 No

 

Reference

 

Reference

 Yes

 

1.10** [1.03,1.18]

 

1.12** [1.05,1.21]

Health insurance coverage

 No

 

Reference

 

Reference

 Yes

 

1.45*** [1.36,1.54]

 

1.46*** [1.37,1.56]

Wealth quintile

 Poorest

  

Reference

Reference

 Poorer

  

1.04 [0.99,1.10]

1.04 [0.99,1.10]

 Middle

  

1.00 [0.95,1.06]

0.98 [0.93,1.04]

 Richer

  

1.14*** [1.08,1.21]

1.05 [0.99,1.12]

 Richest

  

1.74*** [1.63,1.85]

1.38*** [1.28,1.48]

Place of residence

 Urban

  

Reference

Reference

 Rural

  

0.93** [0.89,0.98]

1.01 [0.97,1.06]

Sub-regions

 Southern

  

Reference

Reference

 Eastern

  

0.74*** [0.63,0.87]

0.89 [0.76,1.05]

 Central

  

0.90 [0.77,1.06]

1.00 [0.85,1.18]

 Western

  

0.96 [0.81,1.12]

1.13 [0.95,1.33]

Random effects

 Primary Sampling Unit variance (95% CI)

0.05 [0.04, 0.07]

0.04 [0.03, 0.06]

0.05 [0.04, 0.06]

0.05 [0.03, 0.06]

 Intracluster correlation coefficient

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

 Likelihood ratio Test

165.93 (< 0.001)

124.55 (< 0.001)

144.12 (< 0.001)

123.06 (< 0.001)

 Wald chi-square

Reference

1250.11***

867.21***

1475.59***

Model fitness

 Log-likelihood

-40,584.608

-39,946.864

-40,148.688

-39,828.439

 Akaike’s Information Criterion

81,173.22

79,939.73

80,317.38

79,718.88

 Sample size

61,282

61,282

61,282

61,282

 Number of clusters

1,569

1,569

1,569

1,569

  1. Exponentiated coefficients; 95% confidence intervals in brackets; aOR adjusted odds ratios; CI Confidence Interval; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001