Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment of included studies using the QATSDD

From: Prevalence and factors associated with adolescent pregnancies in Zambia: a systematic review from 2000–2022

QATSDD/Study

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

Total score

%

Grade

1. Wado et al, 2019 [21]

2

3

3

3

3

3

0

3

0

3

N/A

3

3

N/A

0

3

32/42

76.2

Good

2. Blystad et al, 2020 [20]

0

3

2

2

3

2

0

2

N/A

N/A

3

3

0

0

0

3

23/42

54.7

Good

3. Svanemyr, 2019  [23]

0

3

2

2

3

2

0

2

N/A

N/A

3

3

2

1

3

3

29/42

69.0

Good

4. Munakampe et al, 2021 [22]

0

3

3

3

3

2

0

2

0

3

N/A

3

3

N/A

0

3

28/42

66.7

Good

5. Menon et al, 2018 [24]

0

3

3

3

3

2

0

3

0

3

2

3

0

0

0

2

27/48

56.3

Good

6. Austrian et al, 2019 [25]

0

3

3

2

3

2

0

1

0

2

3

3

3

3

0

3

31/48

64.6

Good

  1. 0 = criterion not mentioned at all; 1 = criterion very slightly mentioned; 2 = criterion moderately mentioned; 3 = criterion fully explained
  2. N/A criterion not applicable