Skip to main content

Table 4 RRSO case list

From: Impact of lower co-payments on risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and BRCA testing in Japan

 

Case number

Year

Age

BRCA1/2

Surgical procedure

Insurance/Self-pay

Medical expenses (JPY)

Co-payment (JPY)

Co-payment ratio (%)

STIC

Pre-coverage group

1

2014

65

1

ABSO+CRRM

Self-pay

1,025,930

1,025,930

100

No

2

2017

47

2

TAH+ABSO

Insurance

845,390

0a

0

No

3

2017

50

2

TLH+LBSO

Self-pay

948,190

948,190

100

Yes

4

2017

44

2

TLH+LBSO

Insurance

880,134

264,040

30

No

5

2018

60

2

LBSO

Self-pay

660,000

660,000

100

No

6

2018

49

2

TAH+ABSO

Insurance

873,940

178,839

20

No

7

2019

45

1

TLH+LBSO

Self-pay

1,189,062

1,189,062

100

No

Post-coverage group

8

2020

64

1

TLH+LBSO

Insurance+Self-pay

1,136,060

668,280

59

No

9

2020

31

2

LBSO

Insurance

531,420

59,900

11

No

10

2021

57

2

LBSO

Insurance

602,060

59,900

10

No

11

2021

57

2

LBSO

Insurance

614,120

59,900

10

No

12

2021

53

2

TLH+LBSO+LA

Insurance

1,172,870

179,989

15

No

13

2021

54

2

LBSO

Insurance

613,550

85,866

14

No

14

2021

42

1

TLH+LBSO

Insurance+Self-pay

1,119,960

663,382

59

No

15

2021

72

2

LBSO

Insurance

622,110

59,900

10

No

16

2021

59

2

LBSO

Insurance

614,660

85,877

14

No

17

2021

52

1

TLH+LBSO

Insurance

951,180

257,372

27

No

18

2021

48

1

TLH+LBSO

Insurance+Self-pay

1,130,610

550,341

49

No

  1. STIC serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma, ABSO abdominal bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, CRRM contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy, TAH total abdominal hysterectomy, TLH total laparoscopic hysterectomy, LBSO laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, LA laparoscopic appendectomy
  2. aThe co-payment was zero for low-income patients