From: Overview of the role of robots in upper limb disabilities rehabilitation: a scoping review
Outcomes (references) | Outcomes frequency based on the number of references |
---|---|
Improvement in musculoskeletal functions (Musculoskeletal strength, sensation, perception, vibration, muscle coordination, less spasticity, flexibility and range of motion) [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36, 38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51, 53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63, 65,66,67,68,69,70, 72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80] | 51 |
7 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
Increasing patients’ interest and motivation to perform rehabilitation exercises [30, 32, 71] | 3 |
Rehabilitation robots’ feasibility for train of patients [71, 77, 79] | 3 |
Increasing the patient’s independence in performing rehabilitation exercises [41, 46, 62] | 3 |
Performing repetitive and long exercises very easily with the help of the robot [61] | 1 |
Reducing the duration of rehabilitation exercises [62] | 1 |
Increasing adherence to rehabilitation exercises and more participation in treatment processes [52] | 1 |
Improving the quality of life [61] | 1 |
Improving the quality of the rehabilitation process [64] | 1 |