Skip to main content

Table 2 ANS panel’s interpretation of the reliability of studies for those that had, and had not, indicated possible harm, by number of studies

From: EFSA’s toxicological assessment of aspartame: was it even-handedly trying to identify possible unreliable positives and unreliable negatives?

 

Number of studies reviewed

Number treated as reliable

Number treated as unreliable

Number of studies on which the panel was self-contradictory

Studies not indicating possible harm

81

62

19

2

Studies indicating possible harm

73

0

73

8