Skip to main content

Table 2 ANS panel’s interpretation of the reliability of studies for those that had, and had not, indicated possible harm, by number of studies

From: EFSA’s toxicological assessment of aspartame: was it even-handedly trying to identify possible unreliable positives and unreliable negatives?

  Number of studies reviewed Number treated as reliable Number treated as unreliable Number of studies on which the panel was self-contradictory
Studies not indicating possible harm 81 62 19 2
Studies indicating possible harm 73 0 73 8