Skip to main content

Table 3 Aerobic fitness, muscular and flexibility characteristics for study subjects

From: Impact of a multidisciplinary intervention on physical fitness, physical activity habits and the association between aerobic fitness and components of metabolic syndrome in adults diagnosed with metabolic syndrome

 

Men (N = 97)

Women (N = 95)

Baseline

Month 3

Month 12

P Values†

Baseline

Month 3

Month 12

P Values†

Speed (mph)

3.2 ± 0.1a

3.6 ± 0.1b

3.7 ± 0.1 b

< 0.0001

2.5 ± 0.1a

3.0 ± 0.1b

3.2 ± 0.1c

< 0.0001

Steady-state heart rate (bpm)

120 ± 2

119 ± 2

122 ± 2

0.1635

123 ± 2 a

119 ± 2 b

122 ± 2a

0.0004

VO2max (ml.kg-1.min−1)

38.1 ± 0.6 a

40.5 ± 0.6 b

40.4 ± 0.6 b

< 0.0001

27.5 ± 0.4 a

30.1 ± 0.4 b

30.8 ± 0.4 b

< 0.0001

Aerobic fitness score (unit)

381.5 ± 5.5a

404.8 ± 0.6 b

403.8 ± 5.5 b

< 0.0001

274.6 ± 4.6 a

301.3 ± 4.6 b

308.4 ± 4.6 b

< 0.0001

Health benefit zone - (aerobics) (0 to 4)§

2.0 ± 0.1a

1.6 ± 0.1 b

1.6 ± 0.1 b

< 0.0001

3.8 ± 0.1 a

3.3 ± 0.1 b

3.1 ± 0.1 b

< 0.0001

Partial curl-ups (repetition 0 to 25)

11 ± 1 a

16 ± 1 b

17 ± 1 b

< 0.0001

5 ± 1 a

8 ± 1 b

9 ± 1 b

< 0.0001

Health benefit zone - (Partial curl-ups) (0 to 4)§

3.5 ± 0.2 a

2.6 ± 0.2 b

2.4 ± 0.2 b

< 0.0001

4.1 ± 0.2 a

3.7 ± 0.2 b

3.4 ± 0.2 b

< 0.0001

Push-ups (repetition)

8 ± 1 a

11 ± 1 b

12 ± 1 b

< 0.0001

4 ± 1 a

7 ± 1 b

8 ± 1 b

< 0.0001

Health benefit zone - (Push-ups) (0 to 4)§

3.8 ± 0.12 a

3.3 ± 0.2 b

3.1 ± 0.2 b

< 0.0001

4.0 ± 0.1 a

3.6 ± 0.1 b

3.4 ± 0.1 b

< 0.0001

Flexibility (cm)

16.5 ± 1.0 a

19.0 ± 1.0 b

20.2 ± 1.0c

< 0.0001

23.0 ± 1.0 a

24.9 ± 1.0 b

25.3 ± 1.0 b

0.0003

Health benefit zone - (Flexibility) (0 to 4)§

4.0 ± 0.1 a

3.7 ± 0.1 b

3.5 ± 0.1 b

< 0.0001

3.9 ± 0.2 a

3.5 ± 0.2 b

3.5 ± 0.2 b

< 0.0001

  1. Data are mean ± standard error (SE). § A lower score indicates a better performance. † P values obtained by comparing differences in the variable values within each group (men, woment) by using a linear mixed model analysis