Skip to main content

Table 4 Diagnostic performances after robustness analysis

From: Development and evaluation of the accuracy of an indicator of the appropriateness of interventional cardiology generated from a French registry

Type of robustness analysis

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

Estimate, % (95% CI)

Estimate, % (95% CI)

Estimate, % (95% CI)

Estimate, % (95% CI)

Addition of 5 points to the Syntax score

66.7 (55.1–78.3)

72.0 (66.1–77.9)

40.4 (31–49.8)

71.9 (65.3–78.5)

Subtraction of 5 points to the Syntax score

65.1 (53.3–76.9)

75.6 (69.9–81.3)

43.2 (33.2–53.2)

88.4 (83.8–93.0)

Addition of the 8 files, considering them all inappropriate

66.2 (55.2–77.2)

74.2 (68.4–80.0)

45.2 (35.6–54.8)

87.2 (82.4–92.0)

Addition of the 8 files, considering them all appropriate

65.1 (53.3–76.9)

72.5 (66.7–80.3)

39.4 (30.1–48.7)

88.3 (83.7–92.9)

  1. CI confidence interval