Skip to main content

Table 4 Multivariable regression analysis of social support and related factors with health facility delivery in southwest Ethiopia, 2017 (N = 3304)

From: Maternal social support and health facility delivery in Southwest Ethiopia

Variables

Women Occupation

Health Facility Delivery

No (N = 1755)

N (%)

Yes (N = 1549)

N (%)

OR (95%CI)

AOR (95%CI)

Housewife

1378 (54.1)

1169 (45.9)

1

1

Farmer

226 (45.7)

269 (54.3)

1.40 (1.16,1.70)*

0.97 (0.73, 1.29)

Traders

97 (57.4)

72 (42.6)

0.88 (0.64, 1.20)

0.94 (0.62, 1.41)

Others (private workers & student)

54 (58.1)

39 (41.9)

0.85 (0.56, 1.30)

0.92 (0.51, 1.69)

Household income

Poorest (1st quartile)

461 (50.0)

461 (50.0)

1

1

2nd quartile

280 (54.7)

232 (45.3)

1.20 (0.93,1.53)

0.71 (0.53, 1.01)

3rd quartile

410 (53.3)

359 (46.7)

1.23 (0.99,1.54)

0.92 (0.71, 1.20)

Richest (4th quartile)

437 (57.8)

319 (42.2)

1.52 (1.23,1.88)*

0.80 (0.62, 1.05)

Number of household members

[Mean (±SD)]

5.6 (1.9)

5.8 (2.0)

1.04 (1.01,1.08)*

1.00 (0.95, 1.06)

Travel time to closer health facility [Mean(±SD)]

0.5 (0.4)

0.6 (0.5)

1.44 (1.24,1.67)*

1.51 (1.21,0.90)*

Participated on program that promote healthcare

No

844 (51.1)

809 (48.9)

1

1

Yes

911 (55.2)

740 (44.8)

0.85 (0.74,0.97)*

0.98 (0.80, 1.20)

Involved in deciding place of delivery

No

957 (60.0)

637 (40.0)

1

1

Yes

723 (46.2)

843 (53.8)

1.75 (1.52, 2.02)*

2.12 (1.73, 2.58)

Attitude to facility delivery

[Mean (±SD)]

0.4 (0.2)

0.4 (0.2)

1.46 (1.14,1.88)*

0.94 (0.65, 1.37)

Perception on provided MCH

[Mean (±SD)]

0.3 (0.2)

0.3 (0.3)

1.83 (1.44,2.33)*

1.89 (1.31, 2.71)*

Perceived partner/family members to help them

No

701 (38.9)

1103 (61.1)

1

 

Yes

100 (18.6)

439 (81.4)

2.82 (2.22, 3.45)*

3.62 (2.74, 4.79)*

Received practical support

No

1486 (54.8)

1224 (45.2)

1

1

Yes

269 (45.3)

325 (57.7)

1.47 (1.23, 1.75)*

0.81 (0.50, 1.40)

Accompanied to health facility

No

911 (61.6)

568 (38.4)

1

1

Yes

269 (45.3)

325 (54.7)

1.86 (1.62, 2.14)*

1.63 (1.34, 2.00)*

Size of received supports

(Mean (±SD))

0.5 (0.2)

0.6 (0.2)

1.91 (1.39, 2.62)*

1.30 (0.94, 1.78)

Received continuous support

(Mean (±SD))

0.3 (0.2)

0.4(0.2)

2.17 (1.52, 3.10)*

1.97 (1.20, 3.23)*

Received from partner/family members

No

1625 (53.9)

1388 (46.1)

1

1

Yes

130 (44.7)

161 (55.3)

1.45 (1.14, 1.85)*

1.20 (0.73, 1.97)

Received from relatives/siblings

No

1557 (54.4)

1305 (45.6)

1

1

Yes

198 (44.8)

244 (55.2)

1.47 (1.20, 1.80)*

1.30 (0.94, 1.78)

Received from friends/neighbors

No

1617 (54.4)

1356 (45.6)

1

1

Yes

138 (41.7)

193 (58.3)

1.67 (1.33, 2.10)*

1.62 (1.16, 2.26)*

  1. *significant variables: Model fitness: −2 Log likelihood 2316.918, R2 = .116 (Cox & Snell), .161 (Nagerlkerke)
  2. Homer and Lemeshow (Chi-square 5.08, df 8) = .75, Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients (Chi-square 241.606, df 10) = p.v < 0.001