Skip to main content

Table 3 Determinants of better technical quality antenatal and perinatal care services in health facilities in Nepal (NHFS 2015)

From: Investigation of technical quality of antenatal and perinatal services in a nationally representative sample of health facilities in Nepal

Determinants

Categories

Quality score of facilities antenatal services

Quality score of facilities for perinatal services

  

cOR (95% CI)

aOR (95% CI)

cOR (95% CI)

aOR (95% CI)

Managed by

Public

1.00

 

1.00

1.00

 

Private

0.96 (0.94, 0.99) **

 

1.18(1.08, 1.28) ***

1.13(1.03, 1.23) ***

Region

Terai

1.00

 

0.97(0.85, 1.10)

 
 

Mountain

1.00(0.96, 1.04)

 

1.00

 
 

Hill

0.99(0.95, 1.03)

 

1.05(0.92, 1.20)

 

Province

One

1.00

1.00

1.00

 
 

Madhesh

0.97(0.94, 1.00) *

0.96(0.92, 0.99) *

0.88(0.76, 1.01)

 
 

Bagmati

1.00(0.96, 1.03)

1.01(0.98, 1.05)

1.06(0.93, 1.21)

 
 

Gandaki

1.04(1.00, 1.09) *

1.05(1.01, 1.10) *

0.95(0.81, 1.10)

 
 

Lumbini

1.02(0.98,1.05)

1.01(0.98,1.05)

1.00(0.87, 1.16)

 
 

Karnali

1.00(0.96, 1.04)

1.01(0.97, 1.06)

0.98(0.83, 1.15)

 
 

Sudhur Paschim

1.00(0.97,1.04)

1.01(0.97, 1.04)

0.85(0.73, 0.99) *

 

Facility types

PHCCs and hospitals

1.00

   
 

HPs and clinics

1.01(0.99,1.03)

   

Health facility capacity

Poor

1.00

 

1.00

 
 

Medium

1.01(0.98, 1.03)

 

0.98 (0.89, 1.08)

 
 

High

0.99(0.97, 1.02)

 

0.90(0.82, 1.05)

 

Health facility meeting

No

1.00

 

1.00

 
 

Sometimes

0.99 (0.96,1.03)

 

0.96(0.81, 1.12)

 
 

Monthly

0.98(0.95, 1.01)

 

0.97(0.86, 1.09)

 

Quality assurance activities

No

1.00

 

1.00

 
 

Yes

1.01(0.98, 1.03)

 

0.99(0.91, 1.08)

 

Feedback collection

Yes

1.00

 

1.00

 
 

No

0.98(0.96, 1.00)

 

0.92(0.83, 1.01)

 

Supervision of staff

No

1.00

 

1.00

 
 

Yes

1.02(1.00,1.04)

 

0.93(0.85, 1.01)

 

Constant

  

1.81(1.73, 1.89) ***

 

1.91 (1.61, 2.26) ***

Observations

  

269

109

 

R-squared

  

0.12

0.29

 
  1. *** p < 0.001
  2. ** p < 0.01
  3. * p < 0.05
  4. # These are separate models adjusting for covariates listed in the respective column. Variables which had p < 0.2 included in the final model of each outcome variable. Odds ratios were estimated after exponentiated (log transformed) β regression coefficients
  5. # Independent model for separate outcome variables. For antenatal care, the final multivariable linear regression explained 12.08% of the variation in health facility clinical quality for antenatal services (R-squared = 0.12). For perinatal care, the final multivariable linear regression explained 29% of the variation in health facility clinical quality for perinatal services (R-squared = 0.29)