Skip to main content

Influenza coverage rates in subjects with chronic heart diseases: results obtained in four consecutive immunisation seasons in the Local Health Unit of Ferrara (North Italy)”

Abstract

Background

Seasonal influenza epidemics yearly affects 5–15% of the world’s population, resulting in 3–5 million serious cases and up to 650,000 deaths. According to the 2017–2019 Italian National Immunisation Plan, free immunisation is offered to the categories at increased risk of experience the complications of the infection (over 65 years old subjects, pregnant women and individuals with underlying conditions, including chronic heart diseases). Rising evidence suggests that influenza can trigger adverse cardiovascular events therefore the vaccination is recommended for secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Despite this, the influenza coverage rate in subjects with chronic heart disease is underestimated.

Methods

The study investigated the coverage rate in four consecutive influenza seasons (from 2011/2012 to 2014/2015) in subjects that benefit from exemption from paying healthcare costs for chronic heart disease living in Local Health Unit (LHU) of Ferrara (Italy), comparing the databases of exemptions and immunisations.

Results

The levels of influenza vaccine uptake were unstable, reaching the 50.3% in 2011/2012 immunisation season and falling to 42.2% in the following year. Coverage rates increased with increasing age, without achieving the 75% target, neither in over 65 years old subjects. The logistic regression analysis showed that influenza coverage rates were statistically significant different (p < 0.0001, 0.003 only for category of disease in 2011/2012 immunisation season) according to age, district of residence, category of chronic heart disease and length of exemption, but not influenced by gender.

Conclusions

The recommendation of influenza immunisation was weakly followed in individuals with chronic heart diseases. A collaboration between cardiologists, GPs, scientific societies and patient associations could successfully support influenza vaccine uptake.

Peer Review reports

Background

Influenza is a common, highly contagious respiratory illness caused by virus infecting all age groups. Every year about 5–15% of worldwide population experience seasonal influenza, with 3–5 million severe cases and more than 500,000 death [1]. Complications and consequent hospitalization are more common in the over 65 years old subjects and in those with chronic underlying conditions [2]. The most effective measure to prevent the infection is the annual vaccination [3]. The morbidity and mortality burden in subjects with underlying condition, including chronic heart disease is notable, especially in elderly. In Italy, it is accountable for approximately 8000 deaths and over 40,000 hospitalizations each year, mainly concentrated in the winter period [4]. Complications and deaths related to influenza are more frequent in patients with chronic diseases of the cardiovascular system than in patients with other chronic conditions. In addition to complications related to viral or bacterial pneumonia, the influenza infection can exacerbate pre-existing heart disease [5]. Comparing the number of deaths in the periods of circulation and absence of the virus, a mortality excess was observed: the surplus percentage of deaths varies from 18% in the States United in the period 1959–1999 to 66% in the Netherlands in the period 1979–1987 [6,7,8]. The influenza virus has a marked vascular tropism and a significant role in the atherosclerosis process was shown. The viral genome of influenza A virus was isolated in the wall of vessels with atherosclerotic lesions of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting; moreover, a positive correlation between antibody titers against the influenza A virus and antibodies against oxidized LDL was found in the same patients [9]. In addition, the influenza virus plays a role on the inflammatory and hemocoagulative cascade, acting as a potential destabilizer of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques and, consequently, as a promoter of coronary occlusion [10]. The temporal association between acute coronary syndromes and respiratory infections is sustained by peaks of winter incidence, with similar seasonal variability of both conditions [11]; moreover, about a third of acute coronary syndromes are preceded by respiratory symptoms [12]. A retrospective study also showed that early treatment of influenza in patients with cardiovascular disease is associated with a 60% reduction in the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events, including acute coronary syndromes, in the month following the diagnosis of infection [13]. The vaccination would have a non-specific protective effect eliminating an infection that could destabilize chronic inflammation of the vessel’s wall, while a specific effect would result from specific immunogenic properties of influenza viruses [14]. A decreasing number of cardiac events in vaccinated patients in the following summer was also observed, extending the protection to a period free from the virus circulation [15, 16]. According to the “antigen mimicry” theory, influenza viruses would express antigens similar to those expressed by atherosclerotic plaque [17]. A correlation was also found between the antibody titers of hemoagglutinin A of the influenza virus and oxidized LDL antibodies in patients with rapid progression of atherosclerosis [18].

Since the 1960s, the US government recommended the annual vaccination of patients with cardiovascular disease, including individuals with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease, as secondary prevention strategy [19] and this indication is still supported by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) [20]. A recent Cochrane meta-analysis [21] showed that influenza vaccine significantly reduced cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.45; 95% confidence interval: 0.26–0.76; p value 0.003). American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Guidelines [22] and European Society of Cardiology Guidelines [23] recommend influenza immunisation for patients with previous cardiovascular events. According to 2017–2019 Italian National Immunisation Plan [24], the influenza vaccine, administered by the General Practitioner or in Public Health clinic, is free offered to over 65 years old subjects and to patients suffering from chronic conditions, including heart diseases (namely diseases of the cardiovascular system, including acquired and congenital heart disease). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a 75% coverage rate for at risk groups [25]. Despite national and international recommendations, coverage rates are unsatisfactory [26]. In Italy, the coverage rate in 18–64 years old subjects with at least one chronic disease in the 2017/2018 immunisation season was 23%, while considering only the individuals with chronic heart diseases the estimated coverage rate, according to the PASSI survey, was 23.3% in the period 2015–2018 [27].

We studied the coverage rates for influenza vaccination in four consecutive immunisation seasons from 2011/2012 to 2014/2015 in subjects with chronic heart disease living in the area of the Local Health Unit of Ferrara (Italy) in order to evaluate the vaccine uptake, highlight possible conditions of lower immunisation and hypothesise strategies for improving influenza vaccination compliance.

Methods

Ethical aspects

The research was approved by Ethics Committee of the Area Vasta Centro Emilia Romagna in June 2018 (Protocol Number EM244/2018/UniFe/160797_EM1).

Study population

The study was conducted on subjects with chronic heart diseases resident on the territory of the Local Health Unit (LHU) of Ferrara, that corresponds to the Province of Ferrara (353,481 inhabitants at the 2011 census survey), North-East of Italy, in the time span 2011–2015. Healthcare services are supplied by three hospitals and one University hospital, six “Case della salute” (specialistic health centre, including Public Health clinics) and about 250 General Practitioners (GPs). Subjects with chronic heart diseases were considered as all subjects with an effective exemption from co-payment of the healthcare costs for chronic diseases. As no specific registry was available, the electronic register of requests for exemption from co-payment of the healthcare costs for chronic diseases applied to the Primary Care Department of the Local Health Unit of Ferrara in the period from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2014 was used. Subjects with exemption for acute conditions or presenting only a risk factor (for example hypertension without organ damage) were excluded. The selected codes for chronic heart disease are reported in Supplementary Material 1. The system adopted for the registration of exemption requests did not allow to establish if the exemption was effective in previous years. In addition, in 2011 the exemption renewal caused data overwriting, deleting information about exemption in preceding years. In the following years, any duplicates, due to multiple requests submitted by the same subject, were removed. The date of the first request was recorded as the release date.

Immunisation coverage rates

Data about influenza immunisation for five consecutive seasons (from 2011/2012 to 2014/2015) were obtained from the electronic Registry of Immunisation Service of Public Health Department of Local Health Unit of Ferrara. The database included for each administered vaccine dose personal data of the recipient, including date of birth, gender, municipality and district of residence, place where the vaccination was carried out (Public Health clinic, Community Pediatrics clinic, General Practitioner or Pediatrician’s clinic, Hospital clinic, other services). In the LHU of Ferrara immunisations of at risks children from zero to 14 years of age were administered in Community Pediatrics or Pediatrician’s clinic; from 15 years of age, the vaccination was administered by the General Practitioner or in Public Health clinic. The healthcare workers (HCW) could obtain the influenza immunisation also in the workplace (Hospital clinic, other services). Infants were considered vaccinated when received two doses after at least 4 weeks, for other children, as information about previous immunisations were not available, a single dose was considered. The link with exemptions database was conducted comparing main demographic data of each individual, including name, place and date of birth, residence and, where available, tax code.

Statistical analysis

For all immunisation seasons, the Chi square test was applied to compare coverage rates for influenza immunization according to gender, age group, district of residence (Western District, Centre-North District, South-Eastern District), main category of disease (0A02 Diseases of the circulatory system–Heart diseases and diseases of pulmonary circulation, 0B02 Diseases of the circulatory system – Cerebrovascular Diseases, 0C02 Diseases of the circulatory system – Diseases of veins and lymphatics and other diseases of circulatory system, 0031 Arterial hypertension with organ damage, and undergone a procedure as heart valve replacement or transplant, cardiac device in situ and blood vessel replacement). Logistic regression analysis was applied to compare influenza coverage rate (dependent variable) while gender, age groups (0–14 years old, 15–64 years old, over 65 years old) district of residence, category of disease, length of exemption were independent variables. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 19.0 and Stata 13.0.

Results

The number of subjects with valid exemption from the co-payment of the healthcare costs for chronic heart diseases was variable over the years (Table 1), conditioned by validity’s duration and new requests received each year. The smallest number of exemptions was registered in 2011 (n = 12,231), while the maximum number was registered in 2012 (n = 15,363). On average, the number of effective exemptions by year was 13,475 (standard deviation = 1353.8). For each of the considered years, males were more numerous than females. Most of the females with exemptions belonged to the age group of 65 years or older. In males, however, the most numerous was the 15–64 years old age group, with the exception of 2014. A marginal percentage of exemptions was released to subjects in pediatric age group in both genders. The highest percentage of subjects with cardiovascular disease exemption were resident in the Centre-North District which is also the most populated: over 50% in 2013 and 2014; about 44% in 2011 and over 47% in 2012. The exemption from the co-payment of the healthcare costs was released according to different categories of chronic heart diseases as reported in Supplemental file 1. The disease most frequently associated with the exemption was arterial hypertension with organ damage which justified just under 60% of the released exemptions. About 30% of the exemptions were related to heart diseases and diseases of pulmonary circulation. The third most common cause for the exemption’s release was having undergone an operation (replacement and transplantation of heart valve, replacement of blood vessel, positioning of a cardiac device). The fourth most frequent reason for obtaining an exemption was a disease of the arteries, arterioles, capillaries, veins and lymphatic vessels in 2011–2012, and a cerebrovascular disease in 2013–2014. The duration of the exemption could range from up to 1 year to an unlimited length. The majority of the exemptions had a long duration (equal or longer than 5 years or permanent). The exemptions of unlimited duration were 44.1% in 2011, 30.5% in 2012 and then increased to 41.1 and 48.4% in 2013 and 2014 respectively. The goal for influenza immunisation coverage rate in people with chronic heart disease is 75%. In none of the considered vaccination seasons, coverage rates were close to the target value (Table 2). The trend of vaccination coverage was inconstant with the maximum value (50.3%) recorded in the 2011/2012 immunisation season. In the 2012/2013 vaccination season, the percentage of subjects with an exemption for chronic heart disease receiving the influenza vaccine dropped to 42.2%, and declined to 43.1% in the 2014/2013 vaccination season. In all the immunisation seasons, the coverage rate for influenza was higher in females than in the males, showing the same trend of variability described for the overall population. Influenza coverage rates according to age group are shown in Fig. 1. The influenza vaccine uptake in subjects with exemption from co-payment of healthcare costs for chronic heart disease increased with increasing age, showing a “U” trend with values ​​higher than 20% starting from the pediatric age, progressively decreasing in the following age groups and reaching the highest levels only in over 65 years old individuals. The 75% target coverage rate was achieved in the 2011/2012 and in the 2013/2014 immunisation seasons in the 65–74 years old age group and in over 85 years old subjects. Coverage rates for influenza in people beneficiary of the exemption from co-payment of healthcare costs for chronic heart disease by gender and age groups (pediatric, adult, elderly) are reported in Fig. 2. Coverage levels were similar in males and females, both in adults and in the elderly. Higher values were observed in females than in males, in children in the 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 immunisation seasons; in adulthood in the 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 immunisation seasons, in the 2012/2013 and 2013/2014 immunisation seasons in the elderly. No statistically significant difference between genders was shown. In pediatric age (Fig. 3a), the greater compliance to influenza immunisation was recorded in subjects residing in the South-Eastern District with the highest value (36%) in the 2011/2012 immunisation season, while the lowest level was found in the 2014/2015 immunisation season in children living in the Western District. In all immunisation seasons no statistically significant differences between districts was shown. Similar coverage rates were registered in adult population without distinction between the three districts in all the immunisation seasons (Fig. 3b). Also in the 15–64 years old age group the highest influenza coverage rates were observed in residents of the South-Eastern District, while lower coverage rates were found in individuals residing in the Western District, with significantly lower values ​​than in the other two districts in the immunisation seasons 2011/2012, 2012/2013 and 2013/2014 (Table 3). In over 65-year-olds, the greater compliance to influenza vaccination in all districts was recorded in the 2011/2012 immunisation season (Fig. 3c). Even in this age group, the lowest levels of coverage rates were found in residents of the Western District and the highest in residents in the South-Eastern District. In all vaccination seasons, the coverage rates of elderly residing in the South-Eastern and Centre-North District were significantly higher than those of residents of the Western District, as shown in Table 3. Influenza coverage rates by category of heart disease are presented in Fig. 4. In pediatric age group (Fig. 4a), only exemptions for chronic diseases belonging to the category 0A02 - Diseases of the circulatory system–Heart diseases and diseases of pulmonary circulation were released. The coverage rates were about 20% in all immunisation seasons, excluding the 2011/2012 season that exceeded the 25%. The higher levels of influenza immunisation in adults were observed in subjects with exemption for the category 0A02 Heart diseases and diseases of pulmonary circulation in association with the category 0C02 - Diseases of the arteries, arterioles, capillaries, veins and lymphatic vessels (Fig. 4b), with values between 24.2% (2013/2014 immunisation season) and 37.5% (2011/2012 immunisation season); having undergone an operation (heart valve replacement/transplant, replacement of a blood vessel, cardiac device in situ) with values ranging between 31.7% (2011/2012 immunisation season) and 27.6% (2012/2013 and 2013/2014 immunisation seasons); hypertension with organ damage with a maximum value of 30% in the 2011/2012 immunisation season and a minimum of 23.1% in the 2014/2015 immunisation season. In elderly (Fig. 4c), the influenza coverage rates were higher than in adults in all category of chronic heart diseases. Subjects with exemption due to the association of diseases belonging to the categories 0A02 and 0C02 showed greater compliance to influenza vaccination. The comparison between coverage rates according to the category of chronic heart disease always showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.002 in the 2011/2012 immunisation season and p < 0.0001 in the other immunisation seasons), both in the 15–64 years old age group and in the over 65 years old group. Considering coverage rates according to the length of exemption (Fig. 5), higher levels of vaccination compliance were obtained in children with an exemption lasting from 1 to 4 years (50.7% in the 2011/2012 immunisation season). In the 15–64 years old age group (Fig. 5b), higher levels of influenza vaccine uptake in subjects with duration of the exemption ranging from one to 4 years were observed, with values ​​varying from 41.3% in the 2011/2012 immunisation season to 29% in the 2014/2015 immunisation season. In elderly (Fig. 5c), 73.9% of subjects with unlimited exemption, 64.8% of individuals with exemption’s length equal or greater of 5 years, 63.8% of over 65 years old with exemption up to 1 year and 53.6% of people with exemption with a duration of one to 4 years were vaccinated against influenza in 2011/2012 season. The comparison between influenza coverage rates according to the duration of the exemption showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001) in all the immunisation seasons, both in the 15–64 years old age group than in the over 65 years old. The logistic regression analysis (Table 4) showed that influenza coverage rates were statistically significant different (p < 0.0001, 0.003 only for category of disease in 2011/2012 immunisation season) according to age, district of residence, category of chronic heart disease and length of exemption, but not influenced by gender. Influenza vaccine uptake was statistically significant higher (p < 0.0001) in elderly, in subjects living in the South-Eastern District, in individuals with an exemption’s length equal or greater of 5 years. Statistically significant higher cover rates were observed in subjects with exemption for chronic heart diseases (code 0A02) associated to chronic diseases of veins and lymphatics (code 0C02) in 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 immunisation seasons (p = 0.034 and p = 0.014 respectively), in individuals that underwent an intervention in 2012/2013, 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 immunisation seasons (p < 0.0001, p = 0.008 and p = 0.001 respectively). Subjects with exemption for chronic diseases of veins and lymphatics (code 0C02) alone had statistically significant lower influenza coverage in all immunisation seasons.

Table 1 Characteristics of subject with exemption from co-payment of healthcare costs for chronic heart disease (2010–2014)
Table 2 Coverage rates for influenza in subjects with exemption from co-payment of healthcare costs for chronic heart disease in Local Health Unit of Ferrara (immunisation seasons 2011/2012–2014/2015)
Fig. 1
figure1

Coverage rates according to age in subjects with chronic heart disease

Fig. 2
figure2

Coverage rates for influenza according to age and gender

Fig. 3
figure3

Coverage rates according to district of residence in pediatric age (a), in adults (b), in elderly (c)

Table 3 Comparison of coverage rates by district of residence in adults and elderly with chronic heart diseases
Fig. 4
figure4

Coverage rates according to category of heart disease in pediatric age (a), in adults (b), in elderly (c)

Fig. 5
figure5

Coverage rates according to length of exemption in pediatric age (a), in adults (b), in elderly (c)

Table 4 Coverage rates and logistic regression in subjects with chronic heart disease

Discussion

As a rising number of studies [28,29,30,31,32] demonstrated the protective role of influenza immunisation in relation to acute cardiovascular events in patients with underlying conditions, the annual vaccination becomes particularly prominent as a secondary prevention tool in subjects suffering from coronary artery disease and other cardiovascular diseases. Despite this, the poor available data about the coverage rates in patients with chronic heart disease revealed unsatisfactory levels of compliance. In patients with exemption from the co-payment of healthcare costs for chronic heart disease in LHU of Ferrara, the higher influenza coverage rate (50.3%) was obtained in the 2011/2012 immunisation season, and progressively decreased to 43.1% in the 2014/2015 immunisation season. The optimal target of 75% of vaccinated chronic patients was never reached. In Europe, influenza vaccination of subjects with chronic heart diseases depicted different levels, but still far from desirable rate: below 20% in France [33], 26% in Portugal [34], 32% in Poland [35], 52% in Spain [36]. The highest coverage rate in patients with chronic heart disease was over than 66% in Korea [37]. Canada and the United States achieved vaccination coverage of 43 and 50.5%, respectively [5, 38]. However, the comparison should take in account the different method used (mainly surveys based on interviews or questionnaires administered directly or by telephone with possible recall bias) and the difference in vaccine offer and recommendation in people with chronic conditions depending on healthcare system.

The overall coverage rates in subjects with exemption from the co-payment of healthcare costs for chronic heart disease in LHU of Ferrara were higher than 40% and up to 50% in the 2011/2012 immunisation season, still far away from the ideal target. The influenza vaccination compliance could be partially explained by individuals aged sixty-five or older, who have aged-based recommendation for immunisation. Actually, coverage rates in over 65 years old age group were higher and a statistically significant difference according to age was found.

When considering only the 15–64 years old age group, the coverage levels (minimum value 22.3% in the 2012/2013 immunisation season and maximum value 28.3% in the 2011/2012 immunisation season) are similar to the 23.3% detected in adults aged 18–64 years with cerebrovascular diseases by the Passi Surveillance System [27]. Having an unlimited exemption and benefit from an exemption for the association of category 0A02 heart diseases and diseases of pulmonary circulation and category 0C02 Diseases of the arteries, arterioles, capillaries, veins and lymphatic vessels determined higher compliance to influenza vaccination both in the over 65 years old subjects and in the 15–64 years old age group. In adults also undergoing an intervention, as heart valve transplant/replacement or a cardiac device in situ, increased the immunisation recourse. The increased influenza vaccine uptake in these categories of individuals could be related to the higher severity of chronic heart disease, as suggested by the association of more chronic conditions or by the need for a surgical treatment, and also by the unlimited exemption.

The severity of the disease could lead these individuals to more frequent contacts with healthcare workers (General Practitioner, specialists in cardiology) and therefore to receive multiple opportunities for information and offer of the influenza vaccination. According to Lu et al. [5], the probability of receiving the influenza vaccination increased in adults with chronic conditions who in the last year had ten or more contacts with healthcare personnel compared to those who had no contact. The growing number of accesses to healthcare facilities could be determined by multiple pathologies. Due to the progressive aging of the population, comorbidity is growing in industrialized countries [39]. Suffering from two or more chronic diseases was shown to increase the influenza coverage rate by ten percentage points compared to individuals with a single chronic disease [5]. A dose-response association between influenza vaccine uptake and increasing number of chronic diseases was also observed [40]. Higher rates of immunisation in subjects with more serious conditions can be confirmed by higher levels of vaccination in the elderly, who most likely suffer from more relevant pathological conditions, but oppose with the theory of the so-called “healthy user effect”. Several studies [14, 41] indicated that individuals who choose to adopt preventive measures, vaccination included, are more prone to a healthier lifestyle (physical activity, healthy nutrition, avoid smoking, increased attention to their own well-being, more frequent contacts with the doctor) unconsciously acquiring positive attitudes for health.

In general, the percentage of vaccinated elderly did not reach the minimum desirable threshold of 75%, although the coverage rate in over 65 was higher than in younger at-risk subjects. A great concern in immunisation strategies design is the low compliance in individuals with risk condition, regardless of age. An ongoing lowering of the threshold age for recommending influenza vaccination, starting from 60 years old, could benefit the increasing coverage rate in chronic patients. A study conducted in Spain [42] showed that lowering at 60 years old the age of recommendation increased the vaccination coverage in the target population in all age groups. A pharmacoeconomical analysis applied to the Italian scenario [43] documented that extending the recommendation to 60–64-year olds would also allow to achieve the protection of many subjects with chronic diseases of this age group at no cost. The increased costs for the purchase and administration of the vaccine would be completely balanced by the reduction of the infection and duration of the epidemic, simultaneously decreasing the cost for visits, hospitalizations and antibiotic drugs. The overall savings for the National Health Service would be associated also to a decrease of working days lost and associated costs.

The annual immunization is usually delivered in primary care setting and only occasionally patients are recruited in hospital after an acute event, adversely affecting the compliance. The IAMI study (Influenza vaccination After Myocardial Infarction), a large randomized multicentre prospective placebo-controlled trial enrolling patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI) undergoing coronary angiography that received influenza vaccine in hospital in order to evaluate death and cardiovascular outcomes at 1 year, is currently ongoing [44]. First results are expected in late 2020 and will add high-quality evidence to guidelines recommending influenza vaccination for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A relationship between the risk of acute cardiovascular events following an acute infection, including pneumonia, acute bronchitis, urinary tract infection and bacteriemia has been widely described [45,46,47,48,49]. The association has been shown with a variety of pathogens (viral and bacterial) and sites of infection, stronger and longer when the infection is more severe [50]. The recently and sudden spread of a novel Coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, SARS-CoV-2) causing pneumonia from Wuhan (Hubei province, China) and the WHO pandemic declaration urges attention to the management of subjects with chronic heart disease [51]. The patients with chronic heart diseases are more likely to develop severe symptoms, if infected with SARS-CoV-2, and more susceptible to poor prognosis [52, 53]. These finding, even limited, reinforce the link between acute infection and worsening of chronic heart diseases, strengthening the importance of (if available, as influenza) immunisation compliance in subjects at-risk.

The possible bias of our study was mainly related to the database used for the classification of subjects with chronic heart diseases that was arranged from the registry of exemption. A comprehensive specific database of individuals with chronic cardiovascular conditions was not available and the used registry represented, to our knowledge, the best approach to identify the study population. As only subjects that obtained an active exemption were considered, we could not completely rule out the possibility that other individuals with chronic condition but without exemption were excluded. In consideration of these issues, the data represented the description of results obtained in several consecutive immunisation seasons in the Local Health Unit of Ferrara and could not be generalised. The leading strength of our study consisted in the high quality of data about influenza vaccinations, as the database included all delivered immunisations, regardless the place of administration.

Conclusions

Low coverage rates, similar to the values ​​estimated by the Passi Surveillance System, were found in patients with exemption from co-payment of healthcare costs for chronic heart diseases in the 15–64 years old age group. The compliance to influenza vaccination in subjects with chronic heart diseases showed an increase only in over 65 years old. Vaccination policies based exclusively on the risk condition seem not completely effective in ensuring adequate coverage in people with chronic cardiovascular disease. The promotion of influenza immunisation in the population with chronic diseases could benefit from the synergy between cardiologists, general practitioners, scientific societies and patient associations to implement an awareness campaign on the advantage of vaccination. An ongoing extension of the recommendation of influenza vaccination, regardless of the presence of chronic diseases, to subjects younger than 65 years old could also be valuable, in consideration of the high prevalence of risk conditions starting from the age of fifty. This offer would increase the size of the target population of vaccination with minimal added costs compared to the prospective health gain of effectively reaching a large portion of vulnerable population, through a single recommendation that takes account of age only.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset used and analysed during current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

GP:

General practitioner

LHU:

Local health unit

ICD-9 CM:

International classification of diseases 9th revision clinical modification

code 0A31:

Hypertension with organ damage

code 0A02:

Heart diseases and diseases of pulmonary circulation

code 0B02:

Cerebrovascular diseases

code 0C02 :

Diseases of the arteries, arterioles, capillaries, veins and lymphatic vessels

OR:

Odds ratio

95% CI:

95% confidence interval

n.s.:

not significant

IAMI:

Influenza vaccination after myocardial infarction

STEMI:

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

SARS-CoV-2:

severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

References

  1. 1.

    World Health Organization (WHO). Influenza (2019). www.who.int/influenza/surveillance_monitoring/bod/en. Accessed 3 September 2019.

  2. 2.

    Bella A, Castrucci MR. La sorveglianza integrata dell’influenza in Italia: i risultati della stagione 2018–19. Bollettino Epidemiologico Nazionale 2019; luglio-agosto. https://www.epicentro.iss.it/ben/2019/luglio-agosto/sorveglianza-integrata-influenza-2018-19?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=26settembre2019. Accessed 3 September 2019.

  3. 3.

    Mertz D, Kim TH, Johnstone J, Lam P-P, Science M, Kuster SP, Fadel SA, Tran D, Fernandez E, Bhatnagar N, Loeb M. Populations at risk for severe or complicated influenza illness: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;347:f5061. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5061.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gasparini R, Amicizia D, Lai PL, Panatto D. Clinical and socioeconomic impact of seasonal and pandemic influenza in adults and the elderly. Hum Vaccines Immunother. 2012;8(1):21–8. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.8.1.17622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lu PJ, O’Halloran A, Ding H, Srivastav A, Williams WW. Uptake of influenza vaccination and missed opportunities among adults with high-risk conditions, United States, 2013. Am J Med. 2016;129(6):636.e1–636.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.10.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mackenbach JP, Kunst AE, Looman CW. Seasonal variation in mortality in the Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992;46(3):261–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Reichert TA, Simonsen L, Sharma A, Pardo SA, Fedson DS, Miller MA. Influenza and the winter increase in mortality in the United States, 1959-1999. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160(5):492–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fleming DM, Cross KW, Pannell RS. Influenza and its relationship to circulatory disorders. Epidemiol Infect. 2005;133(2):255–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gurevich VS, Pleskov VM, Levaia MV, Bannikov AI, Mitrofanova LB, Urazgil’deeva SA. Influenza virus infection in progressing atherosclerosis. Kardiologia. 2002;42(7):21–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    MacIntyre CR, Mahimbo A, Moa AM, Barnes M. Influenza vaccine as a coronary intervention for prevention of myocardial infarction. Heart. 2016;102(24):1953–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309983.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Spencer FA, Goldberg RJ, Becker RC, Gore JM. Seasonal distribution of acute myocardial infarction in the second National Registry of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31(6):1226–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Clayton TC, Capps NE, Stephens NG, Wedzicha JA, Meade TW. Recent respiratory infection and the risk of myocardial infarction. Heart. 2005;91(12):1601–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Casscells SW, Granger E, Kress AM, Linton A, Madjid M, Cottrell L. Use of oseltamivir after influenza infection is associated with reduced incidence of recurrent adverse cardiovascular outcomes among military health system beneficiaries with prior cardiovascular diseases. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(2):108–15. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.820357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ciszewski A. Cardioprotective effect of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Vaccine. 2018;36(2):202–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.11.078.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Udell JA, Zawi R, Bhatt DL, Keshtkar-Jahromi M, Gaughran F, Phrommintikul A, Ciszewski A, Vakili H, Hoffman EB, Farkouh ME, Cannon CP. Association between influenza vaccination and cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013;310(16):1711–20. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.279206.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mohseni H, Kiran A, Khorshidi R, Rahimi K. Influenza vaccination and risk for hospitalization in patients with heart failure: a self-controlled case series study. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(5):326–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Madjid M, Naghavi M, Litovsky S, Casscells SW. Influenza and cardiovascular disease: a new opportunity for prevention and the need for further studies. Circulation. 2003;108(22):2730–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Veljkovic V, Glisic S, Veljkovic N, Bojic T, Dietrich U, Perovic VR, Colombatti A. Influenza vaccine as prevention for cardiovascular diseases: possible molecular mechanism. Vaccine. 2014;32(48):6569–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.07.007.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Burney LE. Influenza immunization: Statement. Public Health Rep. 1960;75(10):944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Grohskopf LA, Sokolow LZ, Broder KR, Walter EB, Bresee JS, Fry AM, Jernigan DB. Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices — United States, 2017–18 influenza season. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2017;66(2):1–20. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr6602a1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Clar C, Oseni Z, Flowers N, Keshtkar-Jahromi M, Rees K. Influenza vaccines for preventing cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;5(5):CD005050. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005050.pub3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology. Influenza vaccination as secondary prevention for cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2006;114(14):1549-53.

  23. 23.

    Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, Cooney MT, Corrà U, Cosyns B, Deaton C, Graham I, Hall MS, Hobbs FDR, Løchen ML, Löllgen H, Marques-Vidal P, Perk J, Prescott E, Redon J, Richter DJ, Sattar N, Smulders Y, Tiberi M, van der Worp HB, van Dis I, Verschuren WMM, Binno S, ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: the sixth joint task force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(29):2315–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    2017–2019 Italian National Immunization Plan. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana. GU Serie Generale n. 41 del 18 febbraio 2017. www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_2571_allegato.pdf. Accessed 19 November 2019.

  25. 25.

    World Health Organization (WHO). Vaccines against influenza WHO position paper – November 2012. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2012;87:461–76.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bittner V, Sanderson BK. Influenza vaccination in secondary prevention: an opportunity missed. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2007;27(4):202–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Epicentro. Sistema di sorveglianza Passi. (2019). https://www.epicentro.iss.it/passi/dati/VaccinazioneAntinfluenzale. Accessed 25 September 2019.

  28. 28.

    Gurfinkel EP, de la Fuente RL, Mendiz O, Mautner B. Flu vaccination in acute coronary syndromes and planned percutaneous coronary interventions (FLUVACS) study. Eur Heart J. 2004;25(1):25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gurfinkel EP, de la Fuente RL. Two-year follow-up of the FLU vaccination acute coronary syndromes (FLUVACS) registry. Tex Heart Inst J. 2004;31(1):28–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lavallée P, Perchaud V, Gautier-Bertrand M, Grabli D, Amarenco P. Association between influenza vaccination and reduced risk of brain infarction. Stroke. 2002;33(2):513–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Liu JC, Wang TJ, Sung LC, Kao PF, Yang TY, Hao WR, Chen CC, Hsu YP, Wu SY. Influenza vaccination reduces hemorrhagic stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation: a population-based cohort study. Int J Cardiol. 2017;2(32):315–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Modin D, Jørgensen ME, Gislason G, Jensen JS, Køber L, Claggett B, Hegde SM, Solomon SD, Torp-Pedersen C, Biering-Sørensen T. Influenza vaccine in heart failure. Circulation. 2019;139(5):575–86. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036788.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Verger P, Fressard L, Cortaredona S, Lévy-Bruhl D, Loulergue P, Galtier F, Bocquier A. Trends in seasonal influenza vaccine coverage of target groups in France, 2006/07 to 2015/16: Impact of recommendations and 2009 influenza a(H1N1) pandemic. Euro Surveill. 2018;23(48). https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.48.1700801.

  34. 34.

    Machado A, Kislaya I, Santos AJ, Gaio V, Gil AP, Barreto M, Namorado S, Antunes L, Matias Dias C, Nunes B. Factors associated to repeated influenza vaccination in the Portuguese adults with chronic conditions. Vaccine. 2018;36(35):5265–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.07.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Nitsch-Osuch A, Gołębiak I, Wyszkowska D, Rosińska R, Kargul L, Szuba B, Tyszko P, Brydak LB. Influenza vaccination coverage among polish patients with chronic diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;968:19–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2016_193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Astray-Mochales J, López de Andres A, Hernandez-Barrera V, Rodríguez-Rieiro C, Carrasco Garrido P, Esteban-Vasallo MD, Domínguez-Berjón MF, Jimenez-Trujillo I, Jiménez-García R. Influenza vaccination coverages among high risk subjects and health care workers in Spain. Results of two consecutive National Health Surveys (2011-2014). Vaccine. 2016;34(41):4898–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.08.065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Yang TU, Song JY, Noh JY, Cheong HJ, Kim WJ. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccine coverage rates among patients admitted to a teaching Hospital in South Korea. Infect Chemother. 2015;47(1):41–8. https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2015.47.1.41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Bare I, Crawford J, Pon K, Farida N, Dehghani P. Frequency and consequences of influenza vaccination in adults with congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2018;121(4):491–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.11.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Harrison SM, Wei MY, Lamerato LE, Petrie JG, Toth ME. Multimorbidity is associated with uptake of influenza vaccination. Vaccine. 2018;36(25):3635–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Shrank WH, Patrick AR, Brookhart MA. Healthy user and related biases in observational studies of preventive interventions: a primer for physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(5):546–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1609-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Jiménez-García R, Herńndez-Barrera V, Rodríguez-Rieiro C, de Andrés AL, Jd M-D, Trujillo IJ, Carrasco-Garrido P. Are age-based strategies effective in increasing influenza vaccination coverage?: the Spanish experience. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012;8(2):228–33. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.18433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bonanni P, Gasparini R, Greco D, Mennini FS, Rossi A, Signorelli C. Abbassamento dell’età di raccomandazione della vaccinazione anti-influenzale a 60 anni: una scelta per la salute e per l’economia del Paese. 2013. http://www.societaitalianaigiene.org/site/new/images/docs/documenti/2013/parereinfluenza.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2019.

  44. 44.

    Frobert O, Götberg M, Jonasson L,Erlinge D, Engstrøm T, Persson J, Jensen SE, Omerovic E, James SK, Lagerqvist B, Nilsson J, , Kåregren A, Moer R, Yang C, Agus DB, Erglis A, Jensen LO, Jakobsen L, Christiansen EH, Pernow J. Design and rationale for the influenza vaccination after myocardial infarction (IAMI) trial. A registry-based randomized clinical trial. Am Heart J 2017; 189: 94–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2017.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Smeeth L, Thomas SL, Hall AJ, Hubbard R, Farrington P, Vallance P. Risk of myocardial infarction and stroke after acute infection or vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2611–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Clayton TC, Thompson M, Meade TW. Recent respiratory infection and risk of cardiovascular disease: case-control study through a general practice database. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:96–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Warren-Gash C, Geretti AM, Hamilton G, Rakhit RD, Smeeth L, Hayward AC. Influenza-like illness in acute myocardial infarction patients during the winter wave of the influenza a H1N1 pandemic in London: a case-control study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(5):e002604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Kwong JC, Schwartz KL, Campitelli MA, Chung H, Crowcroft NS, Karnauchow T, Katz K, Ko DT, McGeer AJ, McNally D, Richardson DC, Rosella LC, Simor A, Smieja M, Zahariadis G, Gubbay JB. Acute myocardial infarction after laboratory-confirmed influenza infection. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:345–53. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1702090.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Dalager-Pedersen M, Søgaard M, Schønheyder HC, Nielsen H, Thomsen RW. Risk for myocardial infarction and stroke after community-acquired bacteremia: a 20-year population-based cohort study. Circulation. 2014;129:1387–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Musher DM, Abers MS, Corrales-Medina VF. Acute infection and myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(2):171–6. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1808137.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Madjid M, Safavi-Naeini P, Solomon SD, Vardeny O. Potential effects of coronaviruses on the cardiovascular system: a review. JAMA Cardiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1286.

  52. 52.

    Li B, Yang J,,Zhao F, Zhi L, Wang X, Liu L, Bi Z, Zhao Y. Prevalence and impact of cardiovascular metabolic diseases on COVID-19 in China. Clin Res Cardiol 2020; https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01626-9.

  53. 53.

    Zheng YY, Ma YT, Zhang JY, Xie X. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat Rev Cardiol 2020; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-020-0360-5.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to G. Cosenza, A. De Togni, A. Califano, S. Nola and M. Greco of the Local Health Unit of Ferrara.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GG, GC, SL and AS conceptualised and designed the study. SL collected the data. SL, SC and PF analysed and interpreted the data. PF performed statistical analysis. AS, SL drafted the manuscript. GG, GC, and VB revised it critically. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armando Stefanati.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by Area Vasta of Bologna and Ferrara Ethical Committee on May 2018.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

GG received grants from GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA, Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Seqirus, Sanofi Pasteur Italy, MSD Italy, Merck, Pfizer and Emergent BioSolutions for being consultant or taking part in advisory board, expert meetings, being a speaker or an organizer of congresses/conferences and acting as investigator in clinical trials. VB received grants from Sanofi Pasteur MSD, GSK Biologicals SA, Novartis, Pfizer, Seqirus, Merck Italy, and Sanofi Pasteur for taking part to advisory boards, expert meetings, for acting as speaker and/or organizer of meetings/congresses, outside this work. Other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stefanati, A., Lupi, S., Campo, G. et al. Influenza coverage rates in subjects with chronic heart diseases: results obtained in four consecutive immunisation seasons in the Local Health Unit of Ferrara (North Italy)”. Arch Public Health 78, 103 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-020-00487-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Immunisation
  • Influenza
  • Coverage rate
  • Immunisation season
  • Chronic heart disease
  • Exemption