Skip to main content

A population-based study of health-promoting behaviors and their predictors in Iranian males, 2019

Abstract

Background

Health-promoting lifestyle (HPL) is any measure taken to maintain a person’s health. The most important and influential factor in maintaining and enhancing health are health-promoting behaviors (HPB). This study aimed to determine HPB and their predictors among Iranian men.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 783 Iranian men, living in Tehran, were selected, using multistage cluster sampling. The employed questionnaires, namely the sociodemographic questionnaire, Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II), and the second part of the Personal Resource Questionnaire (PRQ 85-Part 2), were completed through interviews. The relationship between the dependent variables (HPLP-II and its subdomains) and independent variables (sociodemographic characteristics and social support) was investigated using the adjusted General Linear Model (GLM).

Results

The mean ± standard deviation of the total HPLP-II score was 2.72 ± 0.44 in the range of 1–4. Among the six dimensions of the HPB, the participants achieved the highest score (3.00 ± 0.52) and lowest score (1.96 ± 0.56) in spiritual growth and physical activity, respectively. The Pearson test showed that the perceived social support was significantly correlated with HPLP-II (r = 0.23; p < 0.001) and all of its subdomains (r = 0.09–0.24; p < 0.001). Based on the adjusted general linear model, social support, age, job, and income adequacy were the predictors of HPL in men and could explain 30.9% of the variance of the HPL score.

Conclusions

The research findings confirmed the importance of social support and modifying variables (social and personal) in the incidence of HPB in men.

Peer Review reports

Background

Health promotion is a process that empowers people to increase control over and to improve their health [1]. The major focus of health promotion is on disease prevention and self-care ability [2]. The health-promoting behaviors (HPB(are among the most determinant health factors and plays a major role in disease prevention [3,4,5,6]. These behaviors not only prevent diseases but also improve the patients’ quality of life and life expectancy [7,8,9,10]. On the other hand, failure to adopt these behaviors has a direct correlation with the development of diseases [11] and mortality [8].

Pender (1996) divided the HPB into six dimensions of nutrition, physical activity, stress management, health responsibility, interpersonal relationship, and spiritual growth [12]. In other words, the health promotion is comprised of certain behaviors by which a person engages with proper nutrition, regular exercise, avoidance of destructive behaviors, protection against accidents, early diagnosis of disease symptoms, control of emotions and feelings, adaptation with stress and problems, and improvement of interpersonal relationships [13]. Studies have shown that inappropriate health behaviors, lack of health-seeking behaviors, and self-neglect are more common among men than women [14, 15]. Unhealthy behaviors among men, such as alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking, and poor nutrition and its subsequent overweight/obesity, are directly correlated with such diseases as high blood pressure in the future [16]. On the other hand, these three risk factors pose the men’s disability-adjusted life year (DALYs) to risks and increase the incidence of mortality and morbidity among them [17].

Studies have been conducted to investigate HPB in different countries and among different groups, including adolescents [13, 18], women of reproductive age [19], men [20], students [21], medical staff [22], and migrant workers [23]. The observed differences in HPB can be due to determinant health factors, such as individual, social, and economic factors, national health policies, mass media, advertisement methods, and living environment [20]. Another major health factor is social support, which has a significant direct relationship with health promotion and its associated behaviors [24,25,26]. Social support is defined as a subjective feeling of attachment, acceptance, being loved, and receiving help when needed [27].

The HPB and their relationship with perceived social support were investigated among Iranian women at reproductive age [19]. Despite the men’s lifestyle issues, this subject has not been studied in Iran. Given many challenges concerning male health, the difference between male’s lifestyle and female’s lifestyle, and cultural, social, economic, and environmental differences in Iran, it is necessary to address this subject. The results may be useful in making intervention plans for health promotion in this important population group, resulting in their lifestyle quality enhancement. Therefore, this study aimed to find out HPB among men and investigate the relationship of perceived social support and socioeconomic variables with these behaviors among men.

Methods

Study design and participants

This cross-sectional population-based survey with a sample size of 783 men was conducted in Tehran in 2019.

The inclusion criteria were Iranian nationality, living in Tehran, and age group of 15–65 years. The exclusion criteria were having severe mental disorder and lack of speech ability which inhibited responding to the questions.

Sampling

The participants were selected using multistage cluster sampling method. Tehran (capital of Iran) has 22 municipality districts. Each municipality district of Tehran includes a number of regions (generally 300 regions(, and each region includes a number of blocks. First, 50 regions were selected from all 22 districts of Tehran, using the probability sampling method (proportional to the number of households in each district) and then one block was selected randomly from each region. Next, 15 households were selected from each block using systematic sampling. Data collection was done by four trained interviewers through in-person interviews in the evening when the participants were more likely to be at home. Before recruitment to the study, all participants were provided with information about the nature and aim of the study. Moreover, the informed consent of all participants was obtained. In this study, there were not any dropped-out and all of 783 participants finalised the interview.

Questionnaires

Quantitative technique was applied for data collection. Data collection instruments included sociodemographic questionnaire, Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II), and the second part of the Personal Resource Questionnaire (PRQ 85-Part 2).

The sociodemographic information included age, marital status, educational attainment, job, income adequacy, and homeownership status.

The HPLP-II included six categories, namely health responsibility, physical activity, nutrition, spiritual growth, stress management, and interpersonal relationships. It has 52 four-choice items scored by 1 “never,” 2 “sometimes,” 3 “often,” and 4 “always.” The total HPL score was between 52 and 208. The HPLP-II was validated in Iran with an estimated total Cronbach’s alpha of 0.82. The Cronbach’s alpha for its six dimensions ranged between 0.64–0.91 [28]. In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha and ICC of the HPLP-II were 0.89 and 0.92, respectively. The Cronbach’s alpha and ICC of its subdomains varied in the range of 0.67–0.78 and 0.78–0.89, respectively.

The PRQ 85-Part 2 questionnaire included 25 7-point Likert scale items, anchored by “completely agree” to “completely disagree” scored in the range of 25–175 [29]. In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha and ICC of this instrument were 0.91 and 0.88, respectively.

The HPLP-II and PRQ 85-Part 2 were translated into Farsi in Iran and their validity and reliability were assessed in pilot studies [28, 30].

Sample size and data analysis

The estimated sample size was 494 using G-power, based on the results from Mirghafourvand et al.’s study (19), and the correlation coefficient of 0.12 between social support and physical activity of HPB, α = 0.05, power = 85%. The final sample size was 749 because of using cluster sampling and a design effect of 1.5. However, the sample size was ultimately increased to 783 by considering a 5% sample loss.

Data were analyzed with SPSS26. The sociodemographic characteristics, HPB, and social support were described using descriptive statistics including frequency, percent, mean, and standard deviation. The Pearson correlation was used to investigate the relationship between HPB and perceived social support. The one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and independent t-test were used to determine the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and HPB. In the end, the adjusted general linear model was used to predict the effect of each independent variable (perceived social support and demographic characteristics) on the dependent variable (HPLP-II and its subdomains) and also to determine the variance.

Results

Sociodemographic properties

Approximately half the participants (48.02%) were in the range of 25–34 years with the mean age of 38.1 years. The majority of the participants were married (69.85%). About two-thirds of the participants (64.1%) were freelancers. In addition, nearly two-thirds of the participants (60.40%) had a high-school diploma or an academic degree. Approximately, 45% of the participants reported that their monthly income was somewhat sufficient (Table 1).

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants (Iranian men), 2019 (n = 783)

Health-promoting behaviors and perceived social support

The mean ± standard deviation of the total HPLP-II score was 2.72 ± 0.44 within the score range of 1–4 (score 1 is the worst and score 4 is the best condition in terms of HPB). This finding showed that Iranian men moderately adopt HPB. The participants obtained the highest scores in spiritual growth (3.01 ± 0.52), interpersonal relationships (2.88 ± 0.55), nutrition (2.88 ± 0.47), and health responsibility (2.87 ± 0.69). The lowest score was obtained in physical activity (1.96 ± 0.55) and the moderate score in stress management (2.58 ± 0.56) (Table 2). The mean ± standard deviation score of the perceived social support was 126.30 ± 40.26 within the range of 25–175.

Table 2 Mean and standard deviation for perceived social support, health-promoting lifestyle profile II (HPLP-II) and subscales and their association with perceived social support in Iranian men, 2019

Relationship of health-promoting behaviors and perceived social support

Based on the Pearson correlation test, the total HPLP-II score (correlation coefficient (r) = 0.23; p < 0.001) and its subdomains, namely nutrition (r = 0.24; p < 0.001), physical activity (r = 0.24; p < 0.001), health responsibility (r = 0.18; p < 0.001), interpersonal relationships (r = 0.21; p < 0.001), and stress management (r = 0.12; p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with the social support (Table 2). The results of bivariate tests (one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and independent t-test) showed that there was a significant relationship between age, homeownership status, income sufficiency, and job with HPB. These variables, along with social support were inputted into the general linear model. Social support, age, job and income sufficiency were the predictors of HPB in men and could explain 30.9% of the variance in the HPB score (Table 3).

Table 3 The general linear model for factors related to the overall score of health-promoting lifestyle profile II (HPLP-II) in Iranian men, 2019

Discussion

This was the first study into the HPB of Iranian men. The results showed that men moderately engaged in health-promoting behaviors. Social support had a direct significant correlation with the HPB; in addition, social support, age, educational attainment, marital status, job, and income sufficiency were the predictors of the HPB.

The mean total score of HPB was 2.72, which was consistent with a study on women at reproductive age [19], lower than a study on university students in Gilan, Iran [31], and higher than a similar study in Indonesia [32]. These results may be affected by Iranian culture, social environment, and participants’ characteristics.

Consistent with other domestic studies, men obtained the highest score in spiritual growth [33, 34]. This result is due to the cultural and religious status of society, as was mentioned in other studies [35, 36]. On the other hand, physical activity had the lowest score, which was confirmed by the majority of studies on the HPB in different groups [19, 34, 37, 38]. This is because men engage less than women in physical activities [39, 40]. Many factors are associated with a reduced tendency towards physical activities. Among these factors is a lifestyle change caused by changes in cultural and social factors, and the living environment in the modern world [41]. In this study, social support was significantly correlated with HPB and its subdomains. The literature results indicated the positive effect of social support on HPB [19, 42, 43]. Given that social support is a predictor of HPB, social support-based interventions should be considered in HPB programs. The social support perceived by individuals is influenced by socio-economic factors and the cultural status of society. Social injustice, especially in the racial and religious minorities, undermines perceived social support and self-efficacy, and increases the likelihood of developing physical and mental illness [44]. Across life periods, sources of social support are different, among children and adolescents, parental support is most important, whereas adults and older adults relied more on spouses, followed by family and then friends [45]. Among older adults, a formal source of social support with a more secure financial status has the most effect on HPB and life satisfaction [46]. Studies demonstrate that one’s social support network plays an important role in promoting healthy behaviors [43, 47, 48]. This issue especially in low-income areas such as Iran, that there are medical and human resource’s limitations for community healthcare systems, is very important.

Age is another predictor, which was significantly correlated with the total score of HPB. This finding was observed in other studies [43, 49,50,51]. People’s tendency towards the adoption of HPB increases with aging [41, 52, 53]. This finding indicates the positive effect of life experiences as external variables. In fact, lifestyle improvement in older people is associated with greater changes [54].

Job and income, as another predictors, were significantly correlated with the total score of the HPB. In this regard, the managers and experts and also the participants with sufficient income achieved the highest score. These findings were observed in other studies too [41, 55, 56]. Job not only directly affects men’s health [57,58,59,60,61] but also affect their access to healthy food, as well as welfare and healthcare facilities [62]. Insufficient income not only increases the level of stress but also the likelihood of unhealthy behaviors in men [56, 63]. In fact, job status and income are directly related to each other. Having a better job leads to more income. Studies have shown that having a better job position, and higher income reduce the risk of disease and people are more likely to engage in health-promoting behaviors. This finding may be due to better access to health-related services [64, 65].

According to the results, health promotion may be affected by many personal, cultural, and social factors. Therefore, it is needed to make appropriate interventions with further identification of facilitators and barriers to the adoption of the HPB. According to a qualitative study, men believed that they should have as much access to health resources as women do and barriers to such access should be eliminated. Contrary to general beliefs, men tend to cooperate with the healthcare staff and open up their needs with them [66]. Therefore, further studies, specifically qualitative studies, are needed to clarify men’s perception and experience of the HPB.

Among the strengths of this study was using a large sample size and random sampling technique. One research limitation is because of its cross-sectional nature, that the relationships observed between the HPB and demographic characteristics cannot be interpreted as a causality relationship.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations were suggested: 1- Since reduced physical activity has a direct correlation with the majority of chronic diseases, such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases [67, 68], further studies, including qualitative studies, should be conducted to identify why physical activity is less common among men and how they perceive barriers to HPB. The findings can be used to make specific programs to encourage men to become more physically active and provide them with the required facilities; 2- Policy-makers and health care providers, should actively collaborate with adults’ social network resources to promote healthy behaviors. Although interventions and programs to strengthen the social support network of at-risk individuals especially in poor communities should be developed [47, 48]; 3- With aging, the people’s needs in different activities are different from younger people. On the other hand, the majority of societies, including Iranian societies, are facing with global aging population phenomenon. Therefore, to facilitate and institutionalize HPB in older men, structural changes should be made in society to enable them to include such behaviors in their daily life program; 4- Government plans and interventions to fight poverty and create appropriate job opportunities for men can contribute to health promotion in men; and 5- Supervising the price management process by the government, creating appropriate job opportunities, and providing vulnerable groups with supportive packages can greatly help men solve their economic problems.

Conclusion

According to the results, Iranian men moderately engaged in health-promoting behaviors. The participants obtained the highest and lowers scores in spiritual growth and physical activity, respectively. Although social support had a direct significant correlation with the HPB; in addition, social support, age, job, and income sufficiency were the predictors of the HPB. The results also confirmed the importance of social support and modifying demographic variables in the adoption of the HPB. Therefore policy-makers and health care providers, should actively collaborate to develop comprehensive interventions and programs in order to encourage men to improve health-promoting behaviors, especially physical activity, and to strengthen the social support network of at-risk individuals.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

HPL:

Health-promoting lifestyle

HPB:

Health-promoting Behaviors

HPLP-II:

Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II

PRQ:

Personal Resource Questionnaire

GLM:

General Linear Model

DALYs:

Disability-Adjusted Life Years

ICC:

Intra-Correlation Coefficient

References

  1. 1.

    Mehri A, Solhi M, Garmaroudi G, Nadrian H, Sighaldeh SS. Health Promoting Lifestyle and its Determinants Among University Students in Sabzevar, Iran. Int J Prev Med. 2016;7:65.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Buse K, Tanaka S, Hawkes S. Healthy people and healthy profits? Elaborating a conceptual framework for governing the commercial determinants of non-communicable diseases and identifying options for reducing risk exposure. Glob Health. 2017;13(1):34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kaar JL, Luberto CM, Campbell KA, Huffman JC. Sleep, health behaviors, and behavioral interventions: reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease in adults. World J Cardiol. 2017;9(5):396–406.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Langhans W. Food components in health promotion and disease prevention. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66(10):2287–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ashgar RI. Relationships between personal satisfaction, cardiovascular disease risk, and health promoting behavior among Arab american middle-aged women. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000000690.

  6. 6.

    Leung YS, Lee JJW, Lai MMP, Kwok CKM, Chong KC. Association between obesity, common chronic diseases and health promoting lifestyle profiles in Hong Kong adults: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1624.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cao W, Hou G, Guo C, Guo Y, Zheng J. Health-promoting behaviors and quality of life in older adults with hypertension as compared to a community control group. J Hum Hypertens. 2018;32(8–9):540–7.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Thorpe RJ Jr, Wilson-Frederick SM, Bowie JV, Coa K, Clay OJ, LaVeist TA, et al. Health behaviors and all-cause mortality in African American men. Am J Mens Health. 2013;7(4 Suppl):8s–18s.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kowalczyk B, Zawadzka B. Lifestyle and quality of life in working-age people after stroke. Acta Clin Croat. 2020;59(1):30–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ustundag H, Gul A, Ozkaya B, Zengin N. Healthy lifestyle behaviors and quality of life after sleeve Gastrectomy. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2020;43(6):456–62.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tsai SL, Lai CL, Chi MC, Chen MY. Cigarette smoking and health-promoting behaviours among tuberculosis patients in rural areas. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(17–18):2511–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pender NJ. Heath promotion model manual. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mirghafourvand M, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Tavananezhad N, Karkhaneh M. Health-promoting lifestyle and its predictors among Iranian adolescent girls, 2013. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2014;26(4):495–502.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    George ES, Rosenkranz RR, Kolt GS. Chronic disease and sitting time in middle-aged Australian males: findings from the 45 and up study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10(1):20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Teo CH, Ling CJ, Ng CJ. Improving health screening uptake in men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2018;54(1):133–43.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cavalcanti MVA, Oliveira L, Medeiros ACQ, Távora RCO. Life habits of hypertensive elderly men. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2019;40:e20180115.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Fullston T, McPherson NO, Zander-Fox D, Lane M. The most common vices of men can damage fertility and the health of the next generation. J Endocrinol. 2017;234(2):F1–f6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Musavian AS, Pasha A, Rahebi SM, Atrkar Roushan Z, Ghanbari A. Health promoting behaviors among adolescents: a cross-sectional study. Nurs Midwifery Stud. 2014;3(1):e14560.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mirghafourvand M, Baheiraei A, Nedjat S, Mohammadi E, Charandabi SM, Majdzadeh R. A population-based study of health-promoting behaviors and their predictors in Iranian women of reproductive age. Health Promot Int J. 2015;30(3):586–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Thorpe RJ Jr, Kennedy-Hendricks A, Griffith DM, Bruce MA, Coa K, Bell CN, et al. Race, social and environmental conditions, and health behaviors in men. Fam Commun Health. 2015;38(4):297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Peker K, Bermek G. Predictors of health-promoting behaviors among freshman dental students at Istanbul University. J Dent Educ. 2011;75(3):413–20.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hidalgo KD, Mielke GI, Parra DC, Lobelo F, Simões EJ, Gomes GO, et al. Health promoting practices and personal lifestyle behaviors of Brazilian health professionals. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1114.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bhandari P, Kim M. Predictors of the health-promoting behaviors of Nepalese migrant workers. J Nurs Res. 2016;24(3):232–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Balatsoukas P, Kennedy CM, Buchan I, Powell J, Ainsworth J. The role of social network Technologies in Online Health Promotion: a narrative review of theoretical and empirical factors influencing intervention effectiveness. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(6):e141.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sarkar S, Taylor WC, Lai D, Shegog R, Paxton RJ. Social support for physical activity: comparison of family, friends, and coworkers. Work. 2016;55(4):893–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Geller K, Harmon B, Burse N, Strayhorn S. Church-based social Support's impact on African-Americans’ physical activity and diet varies by support type and source. J Relig Health. 2019;58(3):977–91.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mohammadpour M, Mohammad-Alizadeh Charandabi S, Malakouti J, Nadar Mohammadi M, Mirghafourvand M. Effect of counselling with men on perceived stress and social support of their pregnant wives. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2020.1792428.

  28. 28.

    Mohammadi Zeidi I, Pakpour Hajiagha A, Mohammadi ZB. Reliability and validity of Persian version of the health-promoting lifestyle profile. J Mazand Univ Med. 2011;21(1):103–13.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Weinert C, Brandt PA. Measuring social support with the Personal Resource Questionnaire. West J Nurs Res. 1987;9(4):589–602.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Rambod M, Rafii F. Perceived social support and quality of life in Iranian hemodialysis patients. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010;42:242–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01353.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Rafat F, Rezaie-Chamani S, Rahnavardi M, Khalesi ZB. The relationship between spiritual health and health-promoting lifestyle among students. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2018-0158.

  32. 32.

    Giena VP, Thongpat S, Nitirat P. Predictors of health-promoting behaviour among older adults with hypertension in Indonesia. Int J Nurs Sci. 2018;5(2):201–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hosseini M, Ashktorab T, HosseinTaghdisi M, Vardanjani AE, Rafiei H. Health-promoting behaviors and their association with certain demographic characteristics of nursing students of Tehran City in 2013. Glob J Health Sci. 2015;7(2):264–72.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Mohsenipoua H, Majlessi F, Shojaeizadeh D, Rahimiforooshani A, Ghafari R, Habibi V. Predictors of health-promoting behaviors in coronary artery bypass surgery patients: an application of pender’s health promotion model. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016;18(9):e38871.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Clark EM, Huang J, Roth DL, Schulz E, Williams BR, Holt CL. The relationship between religious beliefs and behaviors and changes in spiritual health locus of control over time in a national sample of African Americans. Ment Health Relig Cult. 2017;20(5):449–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Holt CL, Clark EM, Debnam KJ, Roth DL. Religion and health in African Americans: the role of religious coping. Am J Health Behav. 2014;38(2):190–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Harooni J, Hassanzadeh A, Mostafavi F. Influencing factors on health promoting behavior among the elderly living in the community. J Educ Health Promot. 2014;3:40. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9531.131921.

  38. 38.

    Dehkordi LM. Health-promoting lifestyle among people without heart disease in Isfahan. Int J Prev Med. 2018;9:95.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bottorff JL, Seaton CL, Johnson ST, Caperchione CM, Oliffe JL, More K, et al. An updated review of interventions that include promotion of physical activity for adult men. Sports Med. 2015;45(6):775–800.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Olson JS, Hummer RA, Harris KM. Gender and health behavior clustering among U.S. young adults. Biodemography Soc Biol. 2017;63(1):3–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Akande VO, Hendriks AM, Ruiter RAC, Kremers SPJ. Determinants of dietary behavior and physical activity among Canadian Inuit: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Uchendu C, Windle R, Blake H. Perceived facilitators and barriers to nigerian nurses’ engagement in health promoting behaviors: a socio-ecological model approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1314.

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Houle J, Meunier S, Coulombe S, Mercerat C, Gaboury I, Tremblay G, et al. Peer positive social control and Men’s health-promoting behaviors. Am J Mens Health. 2017;11(5):1569–79.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Pao C, Guintivano J, Santos H, Meltzer-Brody S. Postpartum depression and social support in a racially and ethnically diverse population of women. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2019;22(1):105–14.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Gariépy G, Honkaniemi H, Quesnel-Vallée A. Social support and protection from depression: systematic review of current findings in Western countries. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;209(4):284–93.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Bai X, Yang S, Knapp M. Sources and directions of social support and life satisfaction among solitary Chinese older adults in Hong Kong: the mediating role of sense of loneliness. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:63–71.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Hong M, De Gagne JC, Shin H. Social networks, health promoting-behavior, and health-related quality of life in older Korean adults. Nurs Health Sci. 2018;20(1):79–88.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Wu F, Sheng Y. Social support network, social support, self-efficacy, health-promoting behavior and healthy aging among older adults: a pathway analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019;85:103934.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Casswell S, Huckle T, Wall M, Parker K, Chaiyasong S, Parry CDH, et al. Policy-relevant behaviours predict heavier drinking and mediate the relationship with age, gender and education status: Analysis from the International Alcohol Control Study. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018;37(Suppl 2):S86–95.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Amemiya A, Kondo N, Saito J, Saito M, Takagi D, Haseda M, et al. Socioeconomic status and improvement in functional ability among older adults in Japan: a longitudinal study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Seaton CL, Bottorff JL, Caperchione CM, Johnson ST, Oliffe JL. The association between Men’s heath behaviors and interest in workplace health promotion. Workplace Health Saf. 2020;68(5):226–35.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kelly S, Martin S, Kuhn I, Cowan A, Brayne C, Lafortune L. Barriers and facilitators to the uptake and maintenance of healthy behaviours by people at mid-life: a rapid systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0145074.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Tan SL, Storm V, Reinwand DA, Wienert J, de Vries H, Lippke S. Understanding the positive associations of sleep, physical activity, fruit and vegetable intake as predictors of quality of life and subjective health across age groups: a theory based, cross-sectional web-based study. Front Psychol. 2018;9:977.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Peak T, Gast JA. Aging men’s health-related behaviors. SAGE Open. 2014;4(4):2158244014558044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Stephens LD, Crawford D, Thornton L, Olstad DL, Morgan PJ, van Lenthe FJ, et al. A qualitative study of the drivers of socioeconomic inequalities in men’s eating behaviours. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Algren MH, Ekholm O, Nielsen L, Ersbøll AK, Bak CK, Andersen PT. Associations between perceived stress, socioeconomic status, and health-risk behaviour in deprived neighbourhoods in Denmark: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Sritharan J, MacLeod J, Harris S, Cole DC, Harris A, Tjepkema M, et al. Prostate cancer surveillance by occupation and industry: the Canadian census health and environment cohort (CanCHEC). Cancer Med J. 2018;7(4):1468–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Eguchi H, Wada K, Prieto-Merino D, Smith DR. Lung, gastric and colorectal cancer mortality by occupation and industry among working-aged men in Japan. J Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    MacDonald LA, Bertke S, Hein MJ, Judd S, Baron S, Merritt R, et al. Prevalence of cardiovascular health by occupation: a cross-sectional analysis among U.S. workers aged ≥45 years. Am J Prev Med. 2017;53(2):152–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Park J, Kim SG, Park J, Han B, Kim KB, Kim Y. Hazards and health problems in occupations dominated by aged workers in South Korea. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2017;29:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Seko R, Kawado M, Saito S, Shibuya T, Miyamoto M, Yamada H, et al. Associations of occupation, employment type and company size with actions related to health examinations among Japanese employees. Ind Health. 2019;57(4):537–46.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Tanaka R, Tsuji M, Asakura K, Senju A, Shibata E, Kusuhara K, et al. Variation in Men’s dietary intake between occupations, based on data from the Japan environment and Children’s study. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12(5):1621–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Kim YH, Kim H, Jee H. Effects of socioeconomic status, health behavior, and physical activity on the prevalence of metabolic syndrome. J Exerc Rehabil. 2018;14(2):183–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Miyake Y, Tanaka K, Arakawa M. Associations of job type, income, and education with postpartum depressive symptoms: the Kyushu Okinawa maternal and child health study. Psychiatry Res. 2020;291:113224.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Hong E. Factors affecting nurse’s health promoting behavior: focusing on self-efficacy and emotional labor. Korean J Occup Health Nurs. 2014;23(3):154–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Coles R, Watkins F, Swami V, Jones S, Woolf S, Stanistreet D. What men really want: a qualitative investigation of men’s health needs from the Halton and St Helens primary care trust men's health promotion project. Brit J Health Psychol. 2010;15(4):921–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Lee M, Park S, Lee KS. Relationship between morbidity and health behavior in chronic diseases. J Clin Med. 2020;9(1):121.

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Elmesmari R, Reilly JJ, Martin A, Paton JY. Accelerometer measured levels of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity and sedentary time in children and adolescents with chronic disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179429.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants for their contribution to this study.

Funding

This study was funded by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MG, AZ, ZBM, MM, KSG and FS contributed to the design of the protocol. MG, AZ, ZBM, MM, KSG and FS contributed to the implementation and analysis plan. MG, MM and FS has written the first draft of this article and all authors have critically read the text and contributed with inputs and revisions, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mojgan Mirghafourvand.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (code number: IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1397.157).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sanaati, F., Geranmayeh, M., Behboodi Moghadam, Z. et al. A population-based study of health-promoting behaviors and their predictors in Iranian males, 2019. Arch Public Health 79, 23 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00543-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Health-promoting behaviors
  • Social support
  • Sociological features
  • Men
\