Skip to main content

Self-harm prevalence and associated factors among street children in Mashhad, North East of Iran



Self-harm is intentional harmful behavior in the context of emotional distress. Street children are boys and girls under eighteen who are forced to work or live on the streets. These children are exposed to violent situations and high-risk behaviors like self-harm. This study investigated the prevalence of self-harm in street children in Mashhad, the second Metropolis of Iran.


In this cross-sectional study, 98 children were assessed with a 22-item of self-harm Inventory (SHI) questionnaire. A trained social worker interviewed the participants who were referred to Mashhad Welfare Office, February-July 2020.


The mean age of participants was 13.8 (2.3) years old, and 71.4 % of them were male. Of street children 59.2 % have had self-harming behavior, among them 8.6 % had one self-harming behavior, and others have more than one. The self-harmed people who had physical injuries, more frequent injuries were hitting (26.5 %), self-starvation (23.5 %), cutting (21.4 %), respectively. In comparison, common psychological injuries were God-distancing (29.6 %) and self-defeating thoughts (19.4 %). The most important risk factors were having a mental disorder (OR = 6.3, P = 0.002), losing parents (OR = 4.4, P = 0.01), self-harming or suicide history in relatives (OR = 3.2, P = 0.001, OR = 4.3, P = 0.03 respectively), low-educated parents (OR = 4.2, P = 002, OR = 2.8, P = 0.02 for father and mother respectively), and age-increasing (OR = 1.5, P = 0.001).


The prevalence of self-harming in street children is significantly high. Some of these children are in more high-risk conditions that face them to suffer from self-harming at a younger age. Family factors are more important in predicting self-harming and community health decision-makers should provide educational interventions and psychological support for these children and their families.

Peer Review reports


Self-harm is intentional socially unacceptable behaviors that cause harm to the body to overcome the emotional distress, it is described as non-lethal behavior in which a person intentionally injures him/her-self to change him/her current emotions [1]. According to this definition, behaviors such as tattooing, piercing the body, or injuring the skin that is performed according to a particular tradition and culture are not considered a self-harming act [2]. The aim of self-harm in children and teenagers often is not suicide, they just want to reduce inner excitements or attract attention with a simple injury to their skin or body [1]. But self-harm is can become an addictive behavior and it is dangerous and can cause severe physical injury and even death, and also, non-fatal self-harm is a strong predictive factor for suicide attempts [3]. Moreover, self-harm may lead to the person not learning the proper way to deal with stress, feeling guilty, depressed, and ultimately causes exacerbation of the primary psychological illness [4].

The etiology of self-harm refers to many social and psychological factors such as depression, disappointment, low tolerance to stress, low self-esteem, dysfunctional family, community relations, personal problems, psychiatric problems in the family, the impact of peers, rape, physical or psychological abuse, drug abuse, economic poverty and so on [4,5,6].

Street children are boys and girls under the age of eighteen who are forced to work or live on the streets, especially in large cities to survive. In addition, child labor defined as the work that deprives children of their childhood, and is harmful for their physical and mental development [7, 8]. Too many of these children are working on the streets and are exposed to many high-risk conditions such as abusing, neglecting, antisocial behaviors, prone to physical and mental diseases [7, 8]. Family breakdown, abusing by the family, and running away from home are the most important factors for children to stay on the streets [9]. Due to the conditions experienced by these children, they are more likely to blurt symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress that are strongly associated with self-harm or suicide [10]. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) estimate the number of child laborers in the world about 250 million between the ages of 5 and 14 that this number is growing [11]. These children potentially exposed to different high-risk situations that cause many problems for their health and for community health. So far, some studies conducted on street child laborers in Iran and other countries, but few studies have expressed self-harming in these children. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of self-harm and its related factors in Iranian street children in Mashhad, the second Metropolis of Iran.


Study design

We did this cross-sectional study in collaboration with Mashhad Welfare Office to determine the prevalence of self-harm and related factor in street children in Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan province, Iran, in 2020.

Participants and questionnaire

Participants of this study were street child laborers under the age of 18 years old in Mashhad. All of them were recognized by the Mashhad Welfare Office and referred to investigate their problems and improve their condition.

A trained social worker interviewed street children who were referred to Mashhad Welfare Office and were satisfied to participate in the study. Self-harm was assessed by the self-harm Inventory (SHI) questionnaire, which is a 22-item questionnaire designed in 1998 by Sansone and Wiedermann [12]. This questionnaire evaluates the intentionally done behaviors for a self-harming act, such as drug or alcohol abuse, physical or emotional self-harm, and an abusive relationship. The validity and reliability of the Persian version of the SHI questionnaire were confirmed in previous studies by Tahbaz Hoseinzadeh et al. [13]. Also, at the beginning of the interview, a brief questionnaire about the demographic characteristics of participants, his /her family, and some behaviors that may be risk factors for self-harm was filled.

The Mashhad University of Medical Sciences ethics committee approved the protocol of this survey (no., and all respondents provided informed consent.

Sample size and statistical analysis

The study’s sample size was calculated at 98 persons, based on the statistical formula for estimating the frequency of a qualitative variable in the population regarding the prevalence of self-harm in similar studies [1, 3]. Participants were selected by convenience sampling method from all children who were referred to Mashhad Welfare Office between February to July 2020.

Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA –version 16). Descriptive statistics for the demographic characteristics were presented by the mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables and frequency (percentage) for qualitative variables. Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used to investigate the relationship between qualitative variables. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA –version 16). Descriptive statistics for the demographic characteristics were presented by the mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables and frequency (percentage) for qualitative variables. Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used to investigate the relationship between qualitative variables. To compare the mean of quantitative variables in the two groups (children with self-harm and without that), independent t-test or Mann-Whitney tests were used. Logistic regression was used for determining predicting factors of self-harm. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered as the significance level.


Among the Ninety-eight participants, 71.4 % (n = 70) were male, and the rest of them (n = 28) were female. The age range of participants was 8 to 18 years old, with mean age (Standard deviation) of 13.8 (2.3), and there was no significant difference between male and female in terms of age (P = 0.28).

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the participants and their families. According to Table 1 and 25.5 % of street children had dropped out of school, 16.3 % had a history of drug abuse but were now rehabilitated, and 8.2 % were addicted. Based on the past medical history and interviewing, 28.6 % of the participants suffered from mental disorders (anxiety, depression). Among the participants, 23.5 % lost one or both of their parents because of death, and the parents of 8.2 % of children were divorced.

Table 1 Individual and family characteristics of the participants by gender comparison

Some of the children did not live with their family and had related with their family rarely (11.2 %). Among the children who related to their parents, about 66 % expressed that they had dysfunctional emotional relationships. Participants reported a history of self-harm in their friends (37 %), siblings (28.6), parents (25.9), and the rest in others. Results showed that 58 people (59.2 %) of the participants reported self-harming behavior.

Table 2 shows the comparison of characteristics’ participants based on self-harm attempts. Also, the prevalence of self-harm between males and females has no significant difference (62.9 % vs. 50.0 %, P = 0.24). There was a significant difference between the age of those who reported self-harm and other (14.5 (2.3) vs. 12.6 (1.9), P = 0.001), and self-harm prevalence increased in higher age groups(p = 0.01).

Table 2 Comparison of characteristics’ participants based on self-harm attempt

The parental educational level in self-harmed children was significantly lower than other groups both for the paternal and maternal educational level (P = 0.003, 0.02 respectively). Children with mental disorders were significantly more likely to have self-harmful behaviors (P = 0.001). Concerning the life status of the participant’s parents, children who had more attempted self-harm were those whose parents had both died, and conversely, less self-harmed were those whose parents were both alive (P = 0.02). History of self-injury behaviors or suicide in relatives were the significant risk factors in self-harmed children (P = 0.02 for both). Finally, significant variables were enrolled in binary logistic regression analysis on detecting more important risk factors for self-harm.

Table 3 shows the results of logistic regression analysis. The results demonstrate that having a mental disorder (OR = 6.3, P = 0.002), losing parents (OR = 4.4, P = 0.01), history of suicide in relatives (OR = 4.3, P = 0.03), history of self-harm in relatives (OR = 3.2, P = 0.001), low educated parents (OR = 4.2, P = 002, OR = 2.8, P = 0.02 for father and mother respectively), and age-increasing (OR = 1.5, P = 0.001) were the most important risk factors.

Table 3 The results of the regression analysis for determining predicting factors of self-harm

Table 4 shows the frequency of participants’ responses to the SHI questionnaire. As it demonstrates, the more frequently reported self-harm behaviors in physical injuries were hitting one’s self (26.5 %), self-starvation (23.5 %), and cutting one’s self (21.4 %). The most common part of self-injury was the upper limb (50 %), especially the forearms and wrists. After that, respectively, both upper and lower limbs, lower limbs, head and neck, and abdomen were more common (Fig. 1).

Table 4 Frequency of participants’ responses to the SHI questionnaire
Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of self-harm by parts of the body in self-harmed street children

In psychosocial injurious behaviors, the more frequent behaviors were God-distancing (29.6 %), engaging in self-defeating thoughts (19.4 %), setting up a relationship for rejection (17.3 %), and engaging in emotionally abusive relationships (16.3 %). There were no differences in the frequency of positive responses to each question regarding gender, except for sexual abuse that all of them were female.

Table 5 shows the distribution of frequency of positive response to the SHI questionnaire among participants who attempted self-harm. Based on the positive response to each question of the SHI questionnaire, only 8.6 % of participants had one self-harming behavior, and others expressed more than one. Assessment of frequency of different items of SHI questionnaire showed that in children who reported self-harm, the median of positive items was 3, and its interquartile range was 2–7.

Table 5 Distribution of frequency of positive response to SHI questionnaire in participants who attempted self-harm


The result of this survey showed that about 59 % of street children had attempted self-harm. There was no difference between girls and boys in terms of the frequency of self-harm. The age-increasing was directly associated with more self-harm. Losing the parents, a history of mental disorders, a history of self-harm or suicide in relatives, and lower education of parents (as a social determinant of health) had important factors for self-harm in children.

Some studies were conducted to determine the prevalence of self-harm in different age groups and various populations. In a similar study, a lower prevalence rate of self-harm was reported than the result of our study about street children’s self-harm. It should be noted, the participants in most studies were a little older than our range, and a few studies assessed self-harm in lower age children.

Mohammadpour et al. determined in their study, which was conducted in 2009, that the incidence of self-harm in Iranian teenagers educating at the second-grade high school (mean age of 16 years old) was about 4.8 % per year, and this phenomenon was associated with their age, cigarette and alcohol abuse [14]. Furthermore, Gholamzadeh et al. in 2017 in Fars Province (Iran) conducted a five-year population-based study on people with the mean age of 25 years old who had a history of self-harm. They demonstrated that self-harm was more common in lower education levels and males. Moreover, the most common parts for harming were the posterior side of the body, like shoulders, and these self-harming actions mostly are non-suicidal [15]. However, the difference between our and their study results may be due to differences in age of participants. In another study conducted by Fakhari A et al. in 2007 in Tabriz (Iran), it was determined that the most frequent self-harming among high school students is carving. Also, there was a significant relationship between self-harming and smoking, and alcohol use [16].

Research by Nada-raja et al. in 2004 among USA youth (aged 26 years) reported lifetime prevalence of self-harm was 13 %, and 9 % of them had at least one attempted suicide. They demonstrated that people who begin self-harm after a while are more likely to tend suicide [3]. A school-based study in Norway conducted to determine the changes in the prevalence of self-harm and its related factors in the adolescents, in 2002 and 2018, showed self-harm prevalence increased from 4 to 16 %, and it was higher for girls, higher among younger adolescents [17].

In a large population-based cohort study in Australia, the prevalence of self-injury in school pupils aged 14–15 years reported 8 %, and also girls (10 %) more than boys (6 %) reported self-harm [18].

Different surveys in the United States for detecting the prevalence of self-harm in life reported 20–37 % among people aged 14–16 years old and 7–8 % for children aged 11–13 years old [19].

According to the three-phase population-based cohort study conducted by Morgan et al. in 2017 among the British children between 10 and 19 years old, they observed a higher prevalence of self-harm in girls and even a sharp increase in the prevalence of self-harm among girls in 13–16 years old girls between 2011 and 2014 [20].

According to the relevant factors, early detection of pubertal and/or psychiatric disorders such as drug abuse either in children or their parents, identification of vulnerable children and families, support for abused or orphaned children by integrating the required care in the national primary health care program, are some of the policies and programs that can lead to the prevention of the harmful behaviors in the community.

Our results determined that the loss of parents is a risk factor for self-harm; this phenomenon could be due to the parenting style and the supervisory role of them in the families. Based on the Iranian social culture, in the absence of one parent, the other usually takes on the role of two parents, but in the absence of two parents, the risk is higher.

Familiarity with the correct patterns of parenting and resolving conflicts in the family by referring to the scientific support centers is one of the most important points in parenting. In addition, parental educational level was determined as an important factor in parenting and the occurrence of harmful behaviors in siblings.

The limitations of this study were the inability to access some street children for representation of the research sample. Still, this study was novel based on a few studies conducted about self-harm in street children and child labor situations.


The result of this study indicated that more than half of street children had attempted self-harm, which shows that the prevalence of self-harm in these children is high and requires serious consideration. Children characteristics such as the mental disorders and parental factors such as parental education level, losing parents, and history of self-harm in relatives were important risk factors for incidence of self-harm in children.

Availability of data and materials

The data are not publicly available due to the privacy of research participants. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Self-harm Inventory questionnaire


The United Nations Children's Fund


World Health Organization


  1. Shooshtari MH, Khanipour H. Comparison of self-harm and suicide attempt in adolescents: a systematic review. Iran J Psychiatry Clin Psychol. 2014;20(1):13-3.

  2. Claes L, Vandereycken W, Vertommen H. Self-care versus self‐harm: piercing, tattooing, and self‐injuring in eating disorders. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2005;13(1):11–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nada-Raja S, Skegg K, Langley J, Morrison D, Sowerby P. Self-harmful behaviors in a population-based sample of young adults. Suicide LifeThreat Behav. 2004;34(2):177–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kleiman EM, Ammerman B, Look AE, Berman ME, McCloskey MS. The role of emotion reactivity and gender in the relationship between psychopathology and self-injurious behavior. Personality Individ Differ. 2014;69:150–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moran H, Pathak N, Sharma N. The mystery of the well-attended group. A model of personal construct therapy for adolescent self-harm and depression in a community CAMHS service. Couns Psychol Q. 2009;22(4):347–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee WK. Psychological characteristics of self-harming behavior in Korean adolescents. Asian J Psychiatry. 2016;23:119–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghahremani S, Khosravifar S, Ghazanfarpour M, Sahraei Z, Saeidi A, Jafarpour H, et al. Factors affecting child labor in Iran: a systematic review. Int J Pediatr. 2019;7(9):10067–75.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Salihu HA. The growing phenomenon of street children in Tehran. UKH J Soc Sci. 2019;3(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Westers NJ, Plener PL. Managing risk and self-harm: keeping young people safe. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020;25(3):610–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kiss L, Yun K, Pocock N, Zimmerman C. Exploitation, violence, and suicide risk among child and adolescent survivors of human trafficking in the Greater Mekong Subregion. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(9):e152278-e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Law GU, Rostill-Brookes H, Goodman D. Public stigma in health and non-healthcare students: attributions, emotions and willingness to help with adolescent self-harm. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(1):108–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sansone RA, Wiederman MW, Sansone LA. The self-harm inventory (SHI): development of a scale for identifying self‐destructive behaviors and borderline personality disorder. J Clin Psychol. 1998;54(7):973–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tahbaz Hoseinzadeh S, Ghorbani N, Nabavi S. Comparison of self-destructive tendencies and integrative self-knowledge among multiple sclerosis and healthy people. Contemp Psychol. 2011;6(2):35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Poorasl AM, Rostami Fatemeh. The incidence rate of the delibeate self-injury in male high school pupils, Tabriz- Iran. J Gorgan Univ Med Sci. 2009;11(3):31–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gholamzadeh S, Zahmatkeshan M, Zarenezhad M, Ghaffari E, Hoseni S. The pattern of self-harm in Fars Province in South Iran: a population-based study. J Forensic Leg Med. 2017;51:34–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fakhari A, Rostami F, Dastgiree S. Epidemiologic survey of the self-injury in the male students of Tabriz high schools and related factors. Med J Tabriz Univ Med Sci Health Serv. 2007;29(2):119–24.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tørmoen AJ, Myhre M, Walby FA, Grøholt B, Rossow I. Change in prevalence of self-harm from 2002 to 2018 among Norwegian adolescents. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30(4):688–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moran P, Coffey C, Romaniuk H, Olsson C, Borschmann R, Carlin JB, et al. The natural history of self-harm from adolescence to young adulthood: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2012;379(9812):236–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Plener PL, Schumacher TS, Munz LM, Groschwitz RC. The longitudinal course of non-suicidal self-injury and deliberate self-harm: a systematic review of the literature. Borderline Person Disord Emot Dysregul. 2015;2(1):2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Morgan C, Webb RT, Carr MJ, Kontopantelis E, Green J, Chew-Graham CA, et al. Incidence, clinical management, and mortality risk following self harm among children and adolescents: cohort study in primary care. BMJ. 2017;359:j4351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Social welfare affairs of Khorasan Razavi province, and Hamraz Golestan Social Welfare Institute.


This study was funded by Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



L.J.; Designed and Supervised the research, Performed the analysis and co-wrote, and revised the paper. M.D.; Contributed in designed the research, interpretation of data, and revised the paper, and A.N.; Data gathering and data interpretation. AA.M.; Contributed to data interpretations and Drafting the main manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maliheh Dadgarmoghaddam.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Ethics Committee ( Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All methods are carried out according to relevant guidelines and regulations. All participants were informed about the study procedures and completed the questionnaire if they accepted to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jarahi, L., Dadgarmoghaddam, M., Naderi, A. et al. Self-harm prevalence and associated factors among street children in Mashhad, North East of Iran. Arch Public Health 79, 139 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: