Skip to main content
  • Correspondence
  • Open access
  • Published:

A proposal for further developing fatigue-related post COVID-19 health states for burden of disease studies

Abstract

Previous efforts to estimate the burden of fatigue-related symptoms due to long COVID have a very high threshold for inclusion of cases, relative to the proposed definition from the World Health Organization. In practice this means that milder cases, that may be occurring very frequently, are not included in estimates of the burden of long COVID which will result in underestimation. A more comprehensive approach to modelling the disease burden from long COVID, in relation to fatigue, can ensure that we do not only focus on what is easiest to measure; which risks losing focus of less severe health states that may be more difficult to measure but are occurring very frequently. Our proposed approach provides a means to better understand the scale of challenge from long COVID, for consideration when preventative and mitigative action is being planned.

Peer Review reports

Background

Post COVID-19 condition, more commonly known as long COVID, refers to a wide and diverse constellation of symptoms occurring following the acute phase of COVID-19 infection [1, 2]. Population-level burden of disease studies on COVID-19 that have incorporated long COVID indicate that health loss from long COVID contributed more to estimates of YLD (Years Lived with Disability) than health loss from the acute phase of infection. However, published estimates contain a large degree of uncertainty due to inconsistencies in definitions of long COVID across studies [3]. These uncertainties were caused by clear difficulties in establishing estimates of: the risk of developing, incidence, and duration, of an exhaustive list of long COVID symptoms. Another limiting factor was the inability to match any epidemiological inputs to corresponding disability weights at a level that differentiated by severity.

Initial approaches to estimating the burden of COVID-19

In late summer of 2020, members of the European Burden of Disease Network convened to develop a consensus approach for estimating disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to COVID-19. DALYs combine time lost due to morbidity, using YLD, and time lost due to premature death using Years of Life Lost [4,5,6]. Particular considerations were given to data availability and how the quality of epidemiological data may have varied by country, to ensure that the model not only had a theoretical basis but was also applicable in different settings.

Although reports on the occurrence of long COVID had emerged when the European Burden of Disease Network’s consensus model was developed, epidemiological data were sparse. Given the gaps in knowledge at the time, the European Burden of Disease Network’s consensus models conservative recommendation was to include a single health state for long COVID. This involved using the disability weight for ‘infection, post-acute consequences’ to estimate YLD. This was similar to the approach the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study have previously used to model the post-acute consequences of dengue and ebola [7]. The disability weight for this health state is a relatively high value of 0.219 [8]. Additionally, the value was fixed meaning that there was no scaling of degree of symptoms, for example from mild to severe. This presents a limiting factor when trying to match case definitions to the health state.

Although the mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of long COVID are still debated, various hypotheses have been put forward, each of which can induce symptoms with different degrees of severity. On the one hand, long COVID may be related to organ damage following acute COVID-19 infection such as myocardial infection or renal failure, leading to persistent symptoms [9]. Another hypothesis is it is related to a prolonged pro-inflammatory response related to SARS-CoV-2, inducing an atypical response of the immune system and mast cells, and persistent symptoms [10]. In relation to the first hypothesis, this presents additional uncertainties in outcome-based YLD estimates as symptoms could plausibly present as cases of non-communicable disease, such as through increases in the prevalence of cardiovascular conditions, which could lead to double-counting in comprehensive burden of disease studies. Finally, the symptomatology of long COVID has been compared to that of fibromyalgia [11]. However, disability weights are not available for the latter as it is not included in the GBD study.

Evolution of approaches to measuring long COVID

More recently, the GBD Long COVID Collaborators published estimates of the non-fatal disease burden of long COVID [12]. This provided a welcome development from focusing solely on the fatigue-related post-acute consequences, and assessed the disease burden from three clusters of long COVID symptoms: persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings; cognitive problems; and ongoing respiratory problems. Whilst the GBD Long COVID Collaborators have incorporated additional neurological and respiratory disease clusters according to severity, further developments could be considered for the fatigue-related disease cluster as their approach is still in-line with the model proposed from the European Burden of Disease Network over applying the disability weight of 0.219 for ‘infection, post-acute consequences’ to cases with persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings.

The clinical definition of long COVID proposed by the World Health Organization in relation to fatigue is not as restrictive as the one defined by the European Burden of Disease Network or GBD Long COVID Collaborators [12]. In practice this means that a proportion of patients suffering fatigue-related health states – but at a lower level of severity – do not meet the strict threshold to contribute to YLD calculations, thus potentially underestimating the true burden of fatigue-related long COVID. In addition, failing to capture less severe instances of fatigue may lead to studies applying a single disability weight, that is too severe, to cases that span a range of severity states. These limitations are all the more important as several studies have highlighted fatigue as the most prevalent symptom of long COVID [13,14,15]. Neither of these approaches are preferable, but both can be understood, as researchers attempt to understand the impact of long COVID on population health loss.

Proposal for developing fatigue-related health states

The aforementioned issues could be circumvented by extending the range of potential disability weights available for fatigue-related health states. We suggest that the GBD study disability weights used for mild, moderate, and severe anemia could be used to define health states less debilitating than the post-acute consequences of an infectious disease to further augment estimates of the long COVID fatigue disease cluster (Table 1). Several conditions have psychological and pathological symptoms and frequently both these symptoms are included in the health state description (e.g. paraplegia, where feelings of depression are also included in the lay description). For infectious disease, post-acute consequences (fatigue, emotional lability, insomnia) this psychological component is also included. Of course, for some patients the severity of the psychological component may differ, but this is true for many other conditions with a psychological component. Ideally, we would have disability weights for a wide spectrum of severity and diversity of clinical manifestations of a disease; however, in reality available epidemiological data is often limited in terms of information on severity and diversity of clinical manifestations, and we have to make cruder groupings in terms of clinical manifestation of a disease.

These health states link to the GBD-defined symptom cluster of persistent fatigue with bodily pain or mood swings. Importantly, they are on a multiple scale of increasing severity allowing for more accurate matching to epidemiological estimates to reflect that certain symptoms are not only more debilitating, but may have important differences in incidence and duration.

Table 1 Proposed disability weights for long COVID fatigue-related health states

Further research could be undertaken to test the validity of this proposal. Long COVID patients with fatigue could be surveyed over how closely their symptoms match to the health state descriptions outlined in Table 1.

Conclusion

A more comprehensive approach to modelling long COVID in relation to fatigue can ensure that we do not only focus on what is easiest to measure, and thus lose focus of less severe health states that may be more difficult to measure but are occurring very frequently. The approach which we have outlined will help researchers more accurately, and comprehensively, estimate the burden from long COVID. This will provide a better understanding of the scale of challenge from long COVID, for consideration when preventative and mitigative action is being planned.

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

COVID-19:

Coronavirus Disease 2019

DALYs:

Disability-Adjusted Life Years

GBD:

Global Burden of Disease

YLD:

Years Lived with Disability

References

  1. Crook H, Raza S, Nowell J et al. Long covid—mechanisms, risk factors, and management BMJ 2021; 374:n1648 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1648.

  2. World Health Organization. A clinical case definition of post COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus. October 6., 2021. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/345824.

  3. Pires SM, Wyper GMA, Wengler A, et al. Burden of Disease of COVID-19: strengthening the collaboration for national studies. Front Public Health. 2022;10:907012. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.907012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wyper GMA, Assuncao RMA, Colzani E, et al. Burden of Disease methods: a guide to calculate COVID-19 disability-adjusted life years. Int J Public Health. 2021;66:619011. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2021.619011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Devleesschauwer B, McDonald SA, Speybroeck N, et al. Valuing the years of life lost due to COVID-19: the differences and pitfalls. Int J Public Health. 2020;65(6):719–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01430-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wyper GMA, Devleesschauwer B, Mathers CD, et al. Years of life lost methods must remain fully equitable and accountable. Eur J Epidemiol. 2022;37:215–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-022-00846-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hung TM, Wills B, Clapham HE, et al. The uncertainty surrounding the Burden of Post-acute consequences of Dengue Infection. Trends Parasitol. 2019;35(9):673–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Salomon JA, Haagsma JA, Davis A, et al. Disability weights for the global burden of Disease 2013 study. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(11):E712–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00069-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Michelen M, Manoharan L, Elkheir N, et al. Characterising long COVID: a living systematic review. BMJ Global Health. 2021;6:e005427. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Afrin LB, Weinstock LB, Molderings GJ. Covid-19 hyperinflammation and post-covid-19 Illness may be rooted in mast cell activation syndrome. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;100:327–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ursini F, Ciaffi J, Mancarella L, et al. Fibromyalgia: a new facet of the post-COVID-19 syndrome spectrum? Results from a web-based survey. RMD Open. 2021;7:e001735. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Global Burden of Disease Long COVID Collaborators. Estimated global proportions of individuals with persistent fatigue, cognitive, and respiratory symptom clusters following symptomatic COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021. JAMA Published Online October. 2022;10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.18931.

  13. Hastie CE, Lowe DJ, McAuley A, et al. Outcomes among confirmed cases and a matched comparison group in the Long-COVID in Scotland study. Nat Commun. 2022;13:5663. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33415-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Palacios-Ceña D, Gómez-Mayordomo V, et al. Prevalence of post-COVID-19 symptoms in hospitalized and non-hospitalized COVID-19 survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Intern Med. 2021;92:55–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2021.06.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Healey Q, Sheikh A, Daines L, et al. Symptoms and signs of long COVID: a rapid review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2022;12:05014. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.12.05014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication is based upon work from COST Action CA18218 (European Burden of disease Network—www.burden-eu.net), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology—www.cost.eu).

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GW, SM, JH, BD and SP developed the proposal and drafted the original manuscript. All other authors provided critical revisions to the manuscript and approved the final draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grant M. A. Wyper.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

GW is a section editor, and BD is a Co-Editor-in-Chief, of Archives of Public Health. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wyper, G.M.A., McDonald, S.A., Haagsma, J.A. et al. A proposal for further developing fatigue-related post COVID-19 health states for burden of disease studies. Arch Public Health 81, 193 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-023-01212-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-023-01212-1

Keywords