Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

The effect of housing tenure on health status of migrant populations in China: are health service utilization and social integration mediating factors?

Archives of Public Health volume 81, Article number: 200 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Current research suggests that there is an association between housing tenure and the health status of migrant populations, but the potential mediators of this association remain to be explored. We aimed to examine the effect of housing tenure on migrant populations’ health in China and how this effect is mediated by health service utilization and social integration.

Methods

Data from the 2017 China Migrants Dynamic Survey of 47,459 participants was used. Logistic regression models were used to explore the effects of housing tenure, health service utilization, and social integration on the health status of migrant populations. Mediated effects models were used to explore the association among them. This study used the bootstrap method and KHB method to test the mediating effect of health service utilization and social integration.

Results

Compared to private renters, owners with mortgages (OR: 0.828, 95% CI: 0.765–0.896) were significantly associated with a higher risk of poor health. Compared with private renters, outright owners were associated with a lower risk of poor health (OR: 1.016, 95% CI: 0.935, 1.104), but the association was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Moreover, health service utilization (OR: 1.422, 95% CI: 1.268, 1.594) and social integration (OR: 4.357, 95% CI: 3.555, 5.341) were both significantly associated with a higher probability of good health (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Among migrant populations, homeowners with mortgages had a lower likelihood of good health than private renters, while there was no significant difference in the health status between outright owners and private renters. Moreover, health service utilization and social integration mediate the effect of housing tenure on the health status of migrant populations. Policies and interventions can be designed to improve the health service utilization and social inclusion of migrant populations to reduce health disparities across housing tenure types.

Peer Review reports

Text box 1. Contributions to the literature

• Housing is a social determinant of health, and previous studies have shown that housing tenure has an impact on individuals’ health. Yet little research has focused on the pathways between housing tenure and the health status of migrant populations.

• The results show that housing tenure can partially affect health status of migrant populations through health service utilization and social integration.

• These findings contribute to explaining the main pathways of the impact of housing tenure on health and improving China’s migrant populations’ health status.

Background

In recent years, China has experienced rapid urbanization, which has been accompanied by a massive movement of the population [1]. According to the latest statistics, the internal migrant population has increased to more than 375 million in 2020, representing more than 26% of the Chinese total population [2]. These migrants are one of the main productive forces in cities and make an important contribution to economic and social development [3]. Research on the health status of the migrant population is essential for understanding the actual situation of this population, improving their health, and promoting sustainable urban development.

Housing has long been recognized as a social determinant of health, and the relationship between housing and health has long been a subject of interest to researchers and government policymakers [4,5,6,7]. Previous studies have revealed the different health impacts of both the physical aspects of housing, such as housing condition and building design, and the socioeconomic aspects, such as tenure, affordability, and neighborhood [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Among the many potential influences on health, housing tenure is an essential factor that cannot be disregarded. Existing research generally agrees that housing tenure type plays an important role in health [15, 16]. However, this relationship between tenure type and health has been debated [17]. Some previous studies have suggested that homeowners have better health than renters [18, 19], while others have shown the opposite results [4]. On the one hand, ownership of one’s own home can bring a sense of social identity and stability, thereby reducing psychological insecurity [20]. In addition, for the children of migrants, a stable home provides a stable environment for growth and learning, which is conducive to healthy physical and mental development [21]. On the other hand, however, in the context of China’s social reality, as urbanization continues to accelerate and housing prices rise, the relatively low incomes of the migrant population and the difficulty of accessing financial support, such as mortgages or housing provident funds, can create significant pressure to purchase and own a home in the city, which may have a negative impact on the health status of the migrant population [22]. At the same time, home ownership competes with the need for food, education, and health care [23,24,25], placing greater employment pressures and financial burdens on migrants. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the underlying mechanisms how housing tenure impacts health.

However, only a few studies tended to explore the pathways of the association between housing tenure and health status [14, 26, 27]. A Study in Germany found that physical and social features of home and neighborhood partially mediated the association between housing tenure and self-rated health [26]. Also, social environment, such as social capital and social control, mediated the association between housing tenure and mental health [14]. Study in Korea found that satisfaction with economic conditions mediated the association between homeownership and mental health [27].

In addition to the above mediators, health service utilization and social integration also serve as pathways through which housing tenure is associated with migrants’ health outcomes. On the one hand, previous research has indicated that improving the utilization of health services and increasing the diversity of health service providers contribute to better health outcomes [28,29,30]. Higher levels of social inclusion tend to be accompanied by better health outcomes [31]. On the other hand, due to the institutional discrimination (i.e., the unequal rights between homeowners and renters) embedded in China’s housing system [32], migrant renters cannot obtain equal access to basic public health services (e.g., health education, health records, and free medical check-ups) like migrant homeowners and experienced social exclusion [33, 34]. Meanwhile, homeownership has a positive impact on the quality of life, social-economic development, and stability, as well as the social harmony and stability of individuals and families, thereby playing an important role in social integration [35]. However, to our knowledge, no previous study specifically examined the mediation effects of health service utilization and social integration on the association between housing tenure and health. Given that the two pathways could inform diverse policies and interventions to safeguard and enhance migrants’ health, it is imperative to conduct evidence-based research to examine the existence and significance of the two pathways.

This study proposes to examine the impact of the housing tenure of migrants on their health status and to explore the mediating effect of health service utilization and social integration in this context using data from the 2017 China Migrants Dynamic Survey. The conceptual framework is illustrated in Fig. 1. Specifically, two clear questions are addressed: (1) What is the impact of housing tenure on the health status of migrants? (2) Whether housing tenure indirectly affects the health status of migrants through health service utilization and social integration? This study examines the mechanisms through which housing tenure affects the health status of the migrant population in China from both an economic and a sociological perspective and provides recommendations to promote the implementation of relevant policies and measures.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Graphic representation of the conceptual framework

Full size image

Materials and methods

Data source and sample

We utilized the 2017 China Migrants Dynamic Survey data, which was commissioned by the National Health Commission and coordinated by the China Population and Development Research Centre. This survey employed a stratified three-stage probability-proportionate‐to‐size (PPS) sampling method for sampling investigation. The targets of the survey were migrants who were 15 years old and over and who had resided locally for more than one month and held household registrations outside of the host city. This survey covers a total of 16,3969 migrants in all 32 provinces of China, 351 cities, and 8,500 communities or villages. The questionnaire contains basic information of the respondents and their family members, employment status, migration status, health and public services, and social integration, which is valuable for health-related research. In this study, we selected migrants 18–60 years of age. Although the survey records information about the entire household, this study only investigated the economic migration of the household. Migrants whose reason for migration is not employment or business were excluded. Observations with missing values in the variables of interest were also dropped. Finally, 47,459 observations were deemed eligible for inclusion. The flowchart of observations is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The data processing and analysis flowchart of this study

Full size image

Measurements

Self-rated health

Our health outcome was self-rated health, which was measured by the question “How is your health condition?” The responses included “healthy”, “largely healthy”, “unhealthy, but can take care of myself”, and “unable to take care of myself”. Due to the skewed distribution of responses, we treated “health” as “good” health and the rest as “poor” health. Hence, our health outcome was a dummy variable.

Housing tenure

Housing tenure was our primary explanatory variable and was gauged by the questions “What is the nature of your current residence?” and “What was the average monthly housing expenditure for your household in the local area over the past year?”

Consistent with prior literature [36], housing tenure was divided into three categories: private renters (renting from private housing), owners with mortgages (homeowners with mortgages), and outright owners (homeowners without mortgages).

Health service utilization and social integration as mediators

Combining existing literature [37, 38], health service utilization was measured by multiple dimensions, such as health education, health records, and access to public health care. These dimensions were reflected through three questions “Have you been given a local health record?”, “In the past year, have you received health education in your current village/community in the following areas?” and “How long does it take to get to the nearest public health service (including community health centers, village clinics, hospitals, etc.) from where you live?”. A standardized composite score was calculated to measure health service utilization by adding the values of these three variables after standardization.

Align with previous literature [39], social integration was measured by migrants’ perceptions of integration including economic status, social communication, acculturation, and self-identity. These dimensions were reflected through an eight-question scale, which was evaluated using a four-point Likert scale. We scored the degree of agreement produced by the participants as 1 (strongly disagree), 2 (disagree), 3 (generally agree), 4 (strongly agree), of which five items were positive and three items were negative feelings. After reversing the scores of the negative feelings items and summarizing the total items, a standardized composite score was added to measure the level of social integration, with the higher value reflecting a higher level of social integration.

Covariates

With reference to previous studies on housing and health [14, 16], we employed sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors as covariates that may influence health outcomes. Sociodemographic factors included gender, marital status, and age. Socioeconomic factors included education, occupation, and household income (monthly income scaled by ¥1000). Specifically, gender was coded as 1 if the participant is male and 0 otherwise. Marital status was assigned a value of 1 if married and 0 otherwise. Age was used as a continuous variable. Education was divided into three levels from low to high: junior high school or lower, senior high school, and college or higher. According to the occupational division method widely used in China [40,41,42], migrants’ occupations were divided into four categories: manual workers, service personnel, self-employed workers, and professionals.

Statistical analysis

To examine the total, direct, and indirect effects of housing tenure on health, we conducted the Causal Steps Approach [43]. First, we performed a binary logistic regression model to examine the total effect of housing tenure on health. Second, we added health service utilization and social integration in the binary logistic regression model to examine the direct effects of housing tenure, health service utilization, and social integration on health. Third, we further conducted two ordinary least squares regression models with health service utilization and social integration as dependent variables to examine whether housing tenure affected health service utilization and social integration. We controlled sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors in all the models.

This study used the bootstrap method to test the mediating effect of health service utilization and social integration. Since this study tested two mediator variables, to explore which mediator variable contributes the most to the indirect effect, we also used the KHB method [44]. For linear models, unstandardized coefficients (β) were reported, and for logistic models, odds ratios (OR) were reported. Stata/MP 17.0 was used to perform all data analyzes with a two-tailed p value < 0.05 as the level of significance.

Results

Descriptive statistical

Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics of the variables used in the analysis. In this sample, 85.58% of the migrants reported themselves as having good self-rated health. Moreover, the housing tenure is mainly private renter, accounting for 73.78%. After standardization, the mean scores for health service utilization and social integration for migrants were 0.565 ± 0.241 and 0.708 ± 0.138, respectively.

Table 1 Baseline information of the migrants, China, 2017 (N = 47,459)
Full size table

The impact of housing tenure, health service utilization and social integration on the health status of migrant populations

The association between housing tenure and health status, health service utilization, and social integration are illustrated in detail in Table 2. Model 1 shows the total effect of housing tenure on health. Compared to private renters, owners with mortgages (OR: 0.828, 95% CI: 0.765–0.896) were significantly associated with a higher risk of poor health. Compared with private renters, outright owners were associated with a lower risk of poor health (OR: 1.016, 95% CI: 0.935, 1.104), but the association was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Model 2 illustrates the direct effects of housing tenure, health service, and social integration on health. Compared to private renters, owners with mortgages (OR: 0.751, 95% CI: 0.693, 0.813) was still associated with a higher risk of poor health. Compared with private renters, outright owners were associated with a higher risk of poor health (OR: 0.903, 95% CI: 0.829, 0.983). Moreover, health service utilization (OR: 1.422, 95% CI: 1.268, 1.594) and social integration (OR: 4.357, 95% CI: 3.555, 5.341) were both significantly associated with a higher probability of good health. Model 3 and Model 4 demonstrate that the type of housing tenure was significantly associated with health service utilization and social integration. Specifically, owners with mortgages and outright owners were positively associated with health service utilization (owners with mortgages: β = 0.032, 95% CI: 0.026, 0.039; outright owners: β = 0.041, 95% CI: 0.034, 0.048) and social integration (owners with mortgages: β = 0.054, 95% CI: 0.051, 0.058; outright owners: β = 0.068, 95% CI: 0.064, 0.072) compared to private renters.

Table 2 The associations of housing tenure with health outcome, health service utilization and social integration, with “poor” health as references, among migrants, China, 2017 (N = 47,459)
Full size table

Mediating effects of housing tenure on health status through health service utilization and social integration

It can be seen from Table 3 that the confidence intervals for the indirect effects of health service utilization and social integration did not include zero, and there were mediating effects. Table 3 also shows the separate indirect effect size for each mediating variable, as well as in the full model. Adding health service utilization to the mediation model alone, the indirect effects (owners with mortgages: β = 0.016; outright owners: β = 0.020) were significant (p < 0.001). Adding social integration to the mediation model alone, the indirect effects (owners with mortgages: β = 0.086; outright owners: β = 0.108) were significant (p < 0.001). When adding both factors into the mediation model, the indirect effects (owners with mortgages: β = 0.091; outright owners: β = 0.115) of housing tenure were significant (p < 0.001). Between the mediators, social integration contributes more to the indirect effect than health service utilization.

Table 3 The mediating effects of health service utilization and social integration, among migrants, China, 2017 (N = 47,459)
Full size table

Discussion

This study examined the effect of the type of housing tenure on migrants’ health and the pathways of the effect. We found important disparities in health among participants with different types of housing tenure, even after taking into account sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors. Specifically, owners with mortgages had a lower probability of good health than private renters, while there is no significant difference in health between outright owners and private renters. Additionally, we found that the health effect of housing tenure was partially mediated by migrants’ health service utilization and social integration.

There may be several potential explanations for the different health effects of housing tenure. When migrants plan to purchase their own housing, they often have to work longer hours to increase their income, while long working hours have a negative impact on health [45]. Moreover, buying a home creates a lot of psychological stress for migrants, which also impedes their health [46]. These may explain why owners with mortgages had a lower probability of good health than private renters. In addition, when migrant homeowners pay off their loan and become outright owners, they face a smaller risk of housing insecurity and do not experience housing affordability stress than private renters, which could lead to better health outcomes [47,48,49,50]. Homeownership, in itself, can be beneficial for increasing psychological benefits such as emotional stability and a sense of control, which is beneficial for health status [51, 52]. Yet, saving for home ownership competes with other expenses for health-related necessities such as healthy food and healthcare, which causes damage to health [4]. These may explain why there is no significant difference in health between outright owners and private renters.

We extended previous studies by examining the mediation effect of health service utilization and social integration on the association between housing tenure and migrants’ health. We found that homeownership was positively associated with health service utilization, which improved migrants’ health. This may be because, due to the unequal rights between homeowners and renters, migrants who own a home in the host city are positively related to the establishment of a health record and participation in health education, leading to a higher level of health service utilization than migrant renters [33].

Good health service utilization also further promotes migrants’ health. First, good health service utilization is often accompanied by improved disease prevention, better health literacy, higher health care spending, and more convenient health care services, all of which can contribute to better health. A previous study found that states with a higher ratio of social to health spending had significantly better subsequent health outcomes [53]. Second, good utilization of health services can provide better treatment and rehabilitation services, such as surgery and physiotherapy, which likely reduces the adverse health impact of disease. A study in Northwest Ethiopia found that maternal health services significantly reduced mortality rates among pregnant women [54].

Moreover, we found that owners with and without a mortgage were positively associated with a higher social integration level than private renters, which led to a higher probability of good health. First, the higher likelihood of a high social integration level may be because homeownership can be considered an emotional investment and indicates a sense of membership in the host city [55], which could improve migrants’ sense of belonging and make them more easily involved in communities. Second, homeownership can also be considered a financial investment [56]. When housing prices rise rapidly, owning a home represents an increase in household wealth [57], which could enhance the sense of control and self-identity of migrants. Third, from the perspective of residence‑based housing [6], owning a home in the host city means residential stability and can promote a sense of security and settlement intention. All of these can facilitate migrants’ social integration.

A high social integration level further promotes migrants’ health. This may be because a high level of social integration leads to a healthier psychological state, a better social mentality, and less perceived stress, which increases the probability of good health. For example, a previous study found that a high level of social integration increased the sense of personal control, belonging, and trust [31]. In addition, a high social integration level means improved social networks, increased personal identity, and greater community support, all of which may be linked with better health status [58].

As a fundamental guarantee for human survival, housing is especially important for China’s massive population of migrant workers, who constitute one of the country’s largest labor forces. Therefore, the relationship between housing and migrant populations is crucial for China’s development. The different effects of housing tenure on health provide more direct insights. The government should accelerate the reform of housing policy, gradually narrowing the gap between homeowners and renters [59]. For instance, it should actively implement equal rights for rent and purchase to alleviate inequality, promote the construction of indemnificatory housing to improve housing conditions, and provide housing subsidies to improve housing payment capacity for those in housing difficulties. Our mediation analysis results suggested that good health service utilization and a high social integration level were important for migrants’ health promotion. Hence, to better satisfy migrants’ health service needs and reduce the health disparities between renters and homeowners, the government could ask communities to develop a more comprehensive health service utilization system based on social policy development. For social integration, promotions or incentives should be conducted for migrants to participate in these local social activities, such as community sports, to boost their self-identity and sense of belonging [60, 61].

A major strength of this study is that we included a large sample of migrant populations across China, which enhances the persuasiveness of the research findings. Additionally, compared to other research on the mediating effects of housing tenure on health, we have found that health service utilization and social integration were two appropriate mediating variables, which have important sociological implications. This study also has some limitations. Firstly, the use of cross-sectional data in this study was insufficient to establish a causal relationship between housing tenure and health. Secondly, although confounding factors were adjusted for in the model, the absence of information on psychological (e.g., childhood abuse, trauma, or neglect), health behavior (e.g., smoking, drinking, and exercising), and environmental (e.g., neighborhood relations, community health, and housing characteristics) factors may still lead to potential confounding. Thirdly, the measurement of health services was imperfect due to limitations in the available data. Fourthly, while the questionnaire exhibited good reliability and validity, subjective issues could not be completely eliminated. As mentioned earlier, the factors that influence health are complex, and even though mediation analysis was employed to provide a more logical approach to analysis, it may not be sufficiently comprehensive. Follow-up studies are needed in the future to address these gaps.

Conclusions

In conclusion, among the migrant populations, homeowners with mortgages had a lower likelihood of good health than private renters, while there was no significant difference in the health status between outright owners and private renters. Moreover, health service utilization and social integration mediate the effects of housing tenure on the health status of migrant populations. Better health service utilization and higher levels of social integration are associated with a higher probability of being healthy. Policies and interventions can be designed to improve the health service utilization and social integration of migrant populations and reduce health disparities across different housing tenure types.

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the China Migrants Dynamic Survey (2017), which was commissioned by the National Health Commission and coordinated by the China Population and Development Research Centre. https://chinaldrk.org.cn/wjw/#/home.

Abbreviations

OR:

Odds Ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

CIa :

Confidence interval with 5000 bootstrap samples

References

  1. Zhang X, Lu J, Yang Y, Cui J, Zhang X, Xu W, et al. Cardiovascular Disease prevention and mortality across 1 million urban populations in China: data from a nationwide population-based study. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7(12):e1041–e50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Statistic NBo. Seventh National Census Bulletin (No. 7) 2021-05-11. Available from: http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfb/202302/t20230203_1901087.html.

  3. Nikoloski Z, Zhang AW, Hopkin G, Mossialos E. Self-reported symptoms of Depression among Chinese Rural-to-Urban migrants and left-behind Family members. Jama Netw Open. 2019;2(5).

  4. Zhou M, Guo W. Self-rated Health and Objective Health Status among Rural-to-Urban migrants in China: a healthy housing perspective. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2023;42(1).

  5. Swope CB, Hernandez D. Housing as a determinant of health equity: a conceptual model. Soc Sci Med. 2019;243:112571. Epub 20190925.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang S, Cheng C, Tan S. Housing Determinants of Health in Urban China: a structural equation modeling analysis. Soc Indic Res. 2019;143(3):1245–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Andersen MJ, Williamson AB, Fernando P, Wright D, Redman S. Housing conditions of urban households with Aboriginal children in NSW Australia: tenure type matters. BMC Public Health. 2017;18.

  8. Li J, Liu Z. Housing stress and mental health of migrant populations in urban China. Cities. 2018;81:172–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carrere J, Vasquez-Vera H, Perez-Luna A, Novoa AM, Borrell C. Housing Insecurity and Mental Health: the Effect of Housing Tenure and the coexistence of life insecurities. J Urban Health-Bulletin New York Acad Med. 2022;99(2):268–76.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krieger J, Higgins DL. Housing and health: Time again for public health action. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(5):758–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehdipanah R. Without affordable, accessible, and Adequate Housing, Health has No Foundation. Milbank Q. 2023;101:419–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu Y, Wang F. The health consequence of rising housing prices in China. J Econ Behav Organ. 2022;200:114–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou M, Guo W. Housing characteristics and health in urban China: a comparative study of rural migrants and urban locals. Popul Space Place. 2023;29(1).

  14. Zhang T, Li X, Liu J. How does housing tenure mix affect residents’ mental health through a social environment lens? An empirical examination from Guangzhou (China). Front Public Health. 2023. 10.

  15. Bentley RJ, Pevalin D, Baker E, Mason K, Reeves A, Beer A. Housing affordability, tenure and mental health in Australia and the United Kingdom: a comparative panel analysis. Hous Stud. 2015;31(2):208–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Park G-R, Seo BK. Revisiting the relationship among housing tenure, affordability and mental health: do dwelling conditions matter? Health Soc Care Commun. 2020;28(6):2225–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baker E, Bentley R, Mason K. The Mental Health effects of Housing Tenure: causal or compositional? Urban Stud. 2013;50(2):426–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Park G-R, Jung Y. Housing insecurity and health among people in South Korea: focusing on tenure and affordability. Public Health. 2019;171:116–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pledger M, McDonald J, Dunn P, Cumming J, Saville-Smith K. The health of older New zealanders in relation to housing tenure: analysis of pooled data from three consecutive, annual New Zealand health surveys. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019;43(2):182–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li A, Baker E, Bentley R. Understanding the mental health effects of instability in the private rental sector: a longitudinal analysis of a national cohort. Soc Sci Med. 2022;296:114778. Epub 20220205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chung RY, Chung GK, Gordon D, Mak JK, Zhang LF, Chan D, et al. Housing affordability effects on physical and mental health: household survey in a population with the world’s greatest housing affordability stress. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020;74(2):164–72. Epub 20191105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou M, Guo W. Fertility intentions of having a second child among the floating population in China: effects of socioeconomic factors and home ownership. Popul Space Place. 2019;26(2).

  23. Vasquez-Vera H, Leon-Gomez BB, Palencia L, Perez K, Borrell C. Health Effects of Housing Insecurity and Unaffordability in the General Population in Barcelona, Spain. J Urban Health. 2021;98(4):496–504. Epub 20210706.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kavanagh AM, Aitken Z, Baker E, LaMontagne AD, Milner A, Bentley R. Housing tenure and affordability and mental health following disability acquisition in adulthood. Soc Sci Med. 2016;151:225–32. Epub 20160109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mehdipanah R. Without affordable, accessible, and Adequate Housing, Health has No Foundation. Milbank Q. 2023;101(S1):419–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pollack CE, von dem Knesebeck O, Siegrist J. Housing and health in Germany. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58(3):216–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Park G-R, Seo BK. Mental Health among the Korean older Population: how is it related to Asset-based Welfare? J Appl Gerontol. 2021;40(2):142–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hai Y, Wu WL, Yu LW, Wu L. Health literacy and health outcomes in China’s floating population: mediating effects of health service. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):691. Epub 20210408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Friedman B, Delavan RL, Sheeran TH, Bruce ML. The Effect of Major and Minor Depression on Medicare Home Healthcare services Use. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(4):669–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang Z, Xu T, Zhang R, Zhang X, Wang S, Zhang J, et al. The relationship between home and community-based healthcare services utilization and depressive symptoms in older adults in rural China: a moderated mediation model. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):1014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Na L, Hample D. Psychological pathways from social integration to health: an examination of different demographic groups in Canada. Soc Sci Med. 2016;151:196–205. Epub 20160108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang M, Chen J. Unequal school enrollment rights, rent yields gap, and increased inequality: the case of Shanghai. China Econ Rev. 2018;49:229–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Z, Wu Q, Ming J. The Relationship between Homeownership and the Utilization of Local Public Health Services among Rural Migrants in China: a nationwide cross-sectional study. Front Public Health. 2020;8.

  34. Zhong H, Xu J, Piquero AR, Internal Migration. Social Exclusion, and victimization: an analysis of Chinese Rural-to-Urban migrants. J Res Crime Delinquency. 2017;54(4):479–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ziersch A, Due C. A mixed methods systematic review of studies examining the relationship between housing and health for people from refugee and asylum seeking backgrounds. Soc Sci Med. 2018;213:199–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fafard St-Germain A-A, Tarasuk V. Homeownership status and risk of food insecurity: examining the role of housing debt, housing expenditure and housing asset using a cross-sectional population-based survey of Canadian households. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19(1).

  37. Jia H. The impact of basic public health services on migrants’ settlement intentions. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(10).

  38. Yu H-Y, Wu W-L, Yu L-W, Wu L. Health literacy and health outcomes in China’s floating population: mediating effects of health service. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1).

  39. Tong L, Kawachi I. Experiences of discrimination and self-reported health in Chinese migrants: a structural equation model. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1).

  40. Xie Z, Poon AN, Wu Z, Jian W, Chan KY. Is Occupation a good predictor of self-rated health in China? PLoS ONE. 2015;10(5).

  41. Wang Q, Shen JJ, Sotero M, Li CA, Hou Z. Income, occupation and education: are they related to smoking behaviors in China? PLoS ONE. 2018;13(2).

  42. Li X, Deng L, Yang H, Wang H. Effect of socioeconomic status on the healthcare-seeking behavior of migrant workers in China. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(8).

  43. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kohler U, Karlson KB, Holm A. Comparing coefficients of nested nonlinear probability models. Stata J. 2011;11(3):420–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wu W, Chen Y, Stephens M, Liu Y. Long working hours and self-rated health: evidence from Beijing, China. Cities. 2019;95:102401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Fong E, Yuan Y, Gan Y. Homeownership and happiness in urban China. J Housing Built Environ. 2021;36(1):153–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Leifheit KM, Schwartz GL, Pollack CE, Linton SL. Building health equity through housing policies: critical reflections and future directions for research. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2022;76(8):759–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chung RY-N, Chung GK-K, Gordon D, Mak JK-L, Zhang L-F, Chan D, et al. Housing affordability effects on physical and mental health: household survey in a population with the world’s greatest housing affordability stress. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2020;74(2):164–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Vásquez-Vera H, León-Gómez BB, Palència L, Pérez K, Borrell C. Health Effects of Housing Insecurity and Unaffordability in the General Population in Barcelona, Spain. J Urban Health-Bulletin New York Acad Med. 2021;98(4):496–504.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Arundel R, Li A, Baker E, Bentley R. Housing unaffordability and mental health: dynamics across age and tenure. Int J Hous Policy. 2022.

  51. Rohe WM, Van Zandt S, McCarthy G. Home ownership and access to opportunity. Hous Stud. 2002;17(1):51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Cairney J, Boyle MH. Home ownership, mortgages and psychological distress. Hous Stud. 2004;19(2):161–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Bradley EH, Canavan M, Rogan E, Talbert-Slagle K, Ndumele C, Taylor L, et al. Variation in Health outcomes: the role of Spending on Social Services, Public Health, and Health Care, 2000-09. Health Aff. 2016;35(5):760–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Andargie NB, Jebena MG, Debelew GT. Effectiveness of Checklist-based Box System interventions (CBBSI) versus routine care on improving utilization of maternal health services in Northwest Ethiopia: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020;21(1):151. Epub 20200207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Wu F, Logan J. Do rural migrants float’ in urban China? Neighbouring and neighbourhood sentiment in Beijing. Urban Stud. 2016;53(14):2973–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Lin S, Wu F, Wang Y, Li Z. Migrants’ perceived social integration in different housing tenures in urban China. Geoforum. 2023;139.

  57. Dong Z, Hui ECM, Jia S. How does housing price affect consumption in China: Wealth effect or substitution effect? Cities. 2017;64:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 2010;7(7):e1000316. Epub 20100727.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Chen Y, Wang J. Social integration of new-generation migrants in Shanghai China. Habitat Int. 2015;49:419–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Lin Y, Zhang Q, Chen W, Shi J, Han S, Song X, et al. Association between Social Integration and Health among Internal migrants in ZhongShan, China. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(2):e0148397. Epub 20160210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Gao X, Chan CW, Mak SL, Ng Z, Kwong WH, Kot CC. Oral health of foreign domestic workers: exploring the social determinants. J Immigr Minor Health. 2014;16(5):926–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their appreciation to the National Health Commission of China for providing access to the data.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (NO. 19CJY016), the Key Project of Henan province higher education (Humanities and Social Sciences) (NO.21A170020) and the 2023 Graduate Independent Innovation Project of Zhengzhou University (NO. 20230440).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business School of Zhengzhou University, No.100, Science Avenue, Gaoxin District, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, China

    Fulin Jia & Xiaonan Liu

  2. School of Management, Zhengzhou University, No.100, Science Avenue, Gaoxin District, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, China

    Yuxiang Wang

  3. Department of Health Management, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, No.100, Science Avenue, Gaoxin District, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, China

    Mingze Ma

Authors
  1. Fulin Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaonan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuxiang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mingze Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Fulin Jia: conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision, methodology, writing - review & editing; Xiaonan Liu: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, software, writing - original draft; Yuxiang Wang: formal analysis, software, writing - original draft; Mingze Ma: supervision, writing - original draft, writing - review & editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingze Ma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No ethical approval was required as this is a secondary analysis of data gathered by third parties.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jia, F., Liu, X., Wang, Y. et al. The effect of housing tenure on health status of migrant populations in China: are health service utilization and social integration mediating factors?. Arch Public Health 81, 200 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-023-01218-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-023-01218-9

Keywords

Archives of Public Health

ISSN: 2049-3258