Skip to main content

Economic burden of psoriasis in Southern Iran in 2022

Abstract

Introduction

Psoriasis is a common, chronic, and non-contagious skin disease that has no known cause or treatment. Various medical costs for skin disorders, including psoriasis, can be expensive and lifelong. The purpose of the present study was to determine the economic burden of psoriasis in patients admitted to general hospitals affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran in 2022.

Materials and methods

This research was a descriptive, cross-sectional, cost of illness study from a societal perspective. All psoriasis patients (N = 118) admitted to the hospitals affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in 2022 were examined. 7 participants refused to cooperate and were excluded from the study and, the information of 111 patients was collected. A researcher-made data collection form was used to collect data. A prevalence-based approach was used to prepare cost data, and the costing approach was bottom-up. The productivity lost due to the absenteeism of patients and their companions was estimated using the human capital approach. Microsoft Excel ® 2016 was applied to analyze the data.

Results

The mean annual cost per psoriasis patient was estimated to be US$ 30,374.21. Its highest and lowest share was related to direct medical costs (88.61%), direct non-medical costs (7.3%) and indirect costs (4.09%), respectively. Also, the highest mean direct medical, direct non-medical, and indirect costs per patient were related to those of medicine (93.11%), transportation (51.65%), and absenteeism of the patients’ companions due to patient care (71.73%).

Conclusion

Considering that the major contributor in the direct medical cost of treating psoriasis patients was related to medicine, designing appropriate mechanisms for insurance coverage, and allocating government subsidies for the purchase of medicine, are suggested. The result of the current study has important implications for policymakers in developing guidelines for early diagnosis of this disease and reducing the health economic burden.

Peer Review reports

Text box 1. Contributions to the literature

• Psoriasis is a chronic dermatology disease that imposes a significant economic burden on patients and the healthcare system due to direct and indirect costs. Early diagnosis of this disease can help to reduce the health economic burden.

• Based on the results of the present study, the mean annual cost per patient was US$ 30,374.21, and the largest share was related to medication. Also, the highest direct medical, direct non-medical, and indirect costs were related to those of medicine, transportation, and absenteeism of the patients’ companions due to patient care.

• According to the findings and to reduce costs imposed on patients, designing appropriate mechanisms for insurance coverage, allocating government subsidies for the purchase of medicine, improving the appointment status, providing telemedicine services, increasing accommodation for the patients’ companions, and providing public training to make the society aware of the early symptoms of psoriasis are suggested.

Introduction

Psoriasis is a common, chronic, and non-contagious skin disease [1] and often appears in the form of plaque, guttate, erythrodermic, pustular, reverse, sebopsoriasis, and psoriatic arthritis [2, 3]. Different types of skin lesions appear in psoriasis patients, but all have the same important symptoms, including erythema, thickening, and scaling. In severe psoriasis, the lesions are often itchy [4]. The diagnosis of this disease is usually based on the characteristics found in the skin examination. However, if some symptoms of the patients are not typical, a skin biopsy may be needed to confirm the diagnosis. Mild psoriasis is treated with treatments that are applied directly to the skin, and moderate to severe psoriasis is usually treated with systemic and biological drugs that are injected into the subcutaneous or intravenous route [5].

According to the Global Burden of Disease Study (2019), the prevalence of psoriasis in the worldwide was 40,805,386 people. The global prevalence of this illness in Asia was 38.58%, Europe (29.25%), North America (11.5%), Latin America and the Caribbean (8.48%), North Africa and Southwest Asia (5.95%), South Africa (4.92%), and Oceania (1.32%) [6]. The prevalence of psoriasis in 2019 in Iran’s neighboring countries, including Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Saudi Arabia, was between 0.5 and 1%, and in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Turkey, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Oman, it was below 0.5%. The prevalence of this disease in Iran in 2019 was 0.45% (373,112 people), such that its prevalence was 0.57% (472,609 adults) in adults and 0.06% in children (49,748 children) [7, 8].

The annual direct and indirect cost of psoriasis in the United States was about $112 billion in 2013 [9]. The estimated total annual cost of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in Brazil was US$ 758,467, with a mean of US$4,034 per patient in 2016 [10]. Also, in Sweden in 2016, the mean direct and indirect costs in psoriasis patients were estimated to be US$ 1,365 (62%) and US$ 3,319 (50%) higher than the control group, respectively [11]. In Malaysia, in 2017, the cost of each admitted patient per day was US$ 316, and the cost of each outpatient patient was US$ 85 [12]. The mean total 1-year medical costs of psoriasis outpatients in Iran in 2020 was US$ 785, of which the share of direct medical, direct non-medical, and indirect costs was 78.2%, 12.3%, and 9.5%, respectively, and the highest direct medical, direct non-medical and indirect costs were related to medicine, transportation of patients and their companions, and patient’s absenteeism from work due to illness [13]. In Iran in 2021, 35% of patients with psoriasis spent less than US$ 25 per month, 18.2% between 25 and US$ 50, 13.5% between US$ 50 and US$ 75, and 33.3% more than US$ 75 for treatment [14].

Cost of illness analysis was the first economic evaluation technique used in the health field [15, 16, 17]; its basic purpose is to evaluate the economic burden that the disease imposes on society [18]. This type of analysis measures the degree of diseases or risk factors in terms of economic burden and shows the problems in terms of currency units [19]. In cost of illness analysis, researchers are required to identify, list, measure, and value the costs that a disease and its associated diseases can cause [20, 21].

Since the researchers could not find a comprehensive study related to the economic burden imposed on admitted patients with psoriasis in Iran, in this study, the economic burden of psoriasis in patients admitted to general hospitals affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran in 2022 was examined.

Methods

This research was a descriptive, cross-sectional, cost of illness study from a societal perspective. In this study, all psoriasis patients (N = 118) who were admitted to the general hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran in 2022 were examined. 7 participants refused to cooperate and were excluded from the study and, the information of 111 patients was collected.

In this study, to determine the economic burden of psoriasis in admitted patients of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, the societal perspective was used (all costs covered by the patient and third-party payers), which is the most complete perspective because it includes all direct medical costs, direct non-medical costs, and indirect costs for all members of society [22].

A prevalence-based approach was used to prepare cost data. This approach measures the economic burden of a disease in a certain period, which is usually 1 year [18]. Also, the costing approach was bottom-up (collecting information using patient-level data). Compared to the top-down approach, this approach provides more detailed data about the cost of the disease and the use of resources allocated to health [23].

Each US$ was considered equivalent to 42,000 Rials based on the exchange rate announced by the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran in 2022 [24].

In order to collect data, a researcher-made data collection form was prepared and used based on the objectives of the study, a review of previous studies in this field, and consultations with specialists in skin diseases and health economics.

The first part of the data collection form contains questions related to demographic and clinical characteristics of the patient, including gender, age, age of disease onset, duration of the disease, accommodation status, marital status, education level, role of the patient in the family, employment status, the patient income, insurance status, disease symptoms, and smoking status were collected through the self-report of patients or their companions and their medical records. Except for marital status, education level, patient’s income, insurance status, disease symptoms, and questions about transportation and accommodation related to direct non-medical expenses, the rest of the questions were asked as open questions.

The next part of this form was related to direct medical costs, including the costs related to medicine, hoteling, laboratory services, visits,Footnote 1 nursing care package, companion and baby hospital beds, department consumables, common nursing consumable services, and other services, which was often received from patients’ financial bills. Direct medical costs included the total costs paid by the patient and the insurance organization.

Another part of the data in this form was related to direct non-medical costs, including questions about the cost of transportation of patients and their companions, the cost of accommodation and food for patients and their companions, the cost of changes in the home environment to adapt to the disease, the cost of care and nursing of the patient at home, the costs related to the special diet of this disease and the parking cost. This type of cost was received by the self-reporting of the patients or their companions through a telephone call.

The final part of the data collection form was related to indirect costs including patient’s absenteeism from work due to illness and their companions due to patient care. In order to receive this type of cost, the patients and their companions were either directly asked how much of their income they lost or, according to the number of days they were off work and the income of those days (reported by the patients or their caregivers); this amount was calculated by the researcher.

Data related to direct medical costs were often extracted from the medical records of patients, and data related to direct non-medical costs and indirect costs were obtained by asking the patients or their companions. To reduce the recall error, information about direct non-medical costs and indirect costs was asked from the patients for 3 months, and according to the frequent visits of patients for follow-up treatment, the costs were estimated for 1 year.

Productivity lost due to the absenteeism of patients and their companions was estimated using the human capital approach. The human capital method considers the patient’s perspective and counts every hour that they did not work as a lost hour [25]. For those patients who refused to provide their income, as well as for housewives and students, the minimum daily wage set by the Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor and Social Welfare in 2022 was used as proxy (the mean daily wage was US$ 33.17) [26]. Given that none of the patients died of psoriasis during the study period, this study did not have any cost of life years lost due to premature death.

Microsoft Excel ® 2016 was used to analyze the data [27].

Results

Based on the results of the data collected from 111 patients participating in the study, most of them were male (53.2%), 30 to 50 years old (52.3%), with a disease duration of less than 10 years (50.5%), and with the onset of the disease under 30 years (53.2%). Also, most of the patients were living in Shiraz (55.9%), married (81.1%), with education below diploma (40.5%), head of household (50.5%), unemployed, student or housewife (56.8%), with no income (56.8%), covered by social security insurance (46.8%), with plaque and scaling (82.9%), and non-smoker (75.7%) (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of psoriasis patients admitted to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in 2022 (N = 111)

Based on the results obtained, the mean annual cost per patient was US$ 30,374.21; its highest and lowest shares were related to direct medical costs (88.61%) and indirect costs (4.09%), respectively. The highest mean direct medical, direct non-medical, and indirect costs per patient were related to those of medicine (93.11%), transportation of patients and their companions (51.65%), and absenteeism of the patients’ companions due to patient care (71.73%), respectively (Table 2).

Table 2 The mean annual cost of direct medical, direct non-medical, and indirect medical per psoriasis patient admitted to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in 2022 (N = 111)

In addition, the average total costs for men and women were US$ 4,860.70 (SD = US$ 3,075.75) and US$ 4,999.67 (SD = US$ 2,836.57), respectively. The average total costs for young people (Age < 30), middle-aged people (30 ≤ Age ≤ 50), and for older people (Age > 50) were US$ 5,544.31 (SD = US$ 3,018.60), US$ 5,018.37 (SD = US$ 3,178.71) and US$ 4,454.39 (SD = US$ 2,506.31), respectively.

Discussion

The purpose of the present study was to determine the economic burden of psoriasis in patients admitted to general hospitals affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran in 2022.

The results showed that the largest share of total costs was related to direct medical costs. The results of Min et al. (2023), Zarei et al. (2021), Lopes et al. (2019), and Steinke et al. (2013) were consistent with this study [10, 13, 28, 29], but in Moradi (2017), the highest amount was related to indirect costs [30]. One possible reason is that in the present study, only the cost of absenteeism of patients and their companions was calculated as productivity lost, while in Moradi’s study in Iran (2017), the reduction of productivity due to presenteeism was also estimated. In Moradi’s study, the presenteeism was responsible for 45% of the total per patient annual cost of psoriasis in Iran. Another possible reason was due to the large number of unemployed, student, and housewife patients in the present study.

On the other hand, the lowest share of total costs was related to indirect costs. The result of Zarei et al. (2019) was consistent with this study [13], but in Min et al. (2023), Lopes et al. (2019), Moradi (2017), and Steinke et al. (2013), the lowest amount was related to direct non-medical costs [10, 28,29,30]. One possible reason for the lower indirect costs compared to direct non-medical costs in this study was the low level of productivity lost due to the absenteeism of patients and their companions due to their low income.

The largest share of direct medical costs was related to medicine. The results of Löfvendahl et al. (2022), Zarei et al. (2021), Amiri et al. (2021), Lopes et al. (2019), Azizam et al. (2019) and Levy et al. (2012) were also consistent with this study [10, 12, 13, 31,32,33]. The high share of medicine was due to its high price, especially the price of biological drugs [28, 34] and lack of government and insurance support. It can be said that, because psoriasis is an autoimmune disease and has a long treatment period [4], and also, to prevent the recurrence of the disease, the patients had to use medicine continuously. In order to reduce the direct treatment costs imposed on patients due to hospitalization in private centers for drug injections, it is expected that the medical authorities will increase the number of beds in the dermatology department in government medical centers to solve the problem of the limitation of patient admission capacity.

Direct non-medical costs were only a very small part of the total costs of psoriasis, although transportation of patients and their companions accounted for the largest share of direct non-medical costs. The results of Zarei et al. (2021) and Lopes et al. (2019) were also indicated that transportation costs were responsible for the highest share of direct non-medical costs [10, 13]. Unlike the cost of transportation, which is necessary for all patients, other direct non-medical costs, such as the cost of food and accommodation, can be greatly reduced by using alternative strategies. For example, patients and their companions used to sleep in tents, use the patient’s companion accommodation, bring food from home, and give up the expensive diet suitable for the disease. Also, more than half of the patients were living in Shiraz, and they usually did not pay for accommodation and food, but they had to pay for transportation [35].

In order to reduce non-medical direct costs such as transportation, food and accommodation and indirect costs including lost productivity costs due to the absenteeism of patients and their companions, it is necessary to provide the necessary infrastructure to provide teledermatology services to patients who have to long travel to receive medical services or travel is difficult for them due to severe lesions caused by psoriasis.

The limitations of this study include the non-cooperation of some patients or their companions to provide the required data (7 patients), forgetting the exact amount of some costs, and providing incomplete data by patients or their companions. Also, indirect cost and direct non-medical cost were estimated based on self-reports of patients or their companions.

Conclusion

The mean annual cost per patient was US$ 30,374.21, and the largest share was related to direct medical costs and medications. Also, the highest direct medical, direct non-medical, and indirect costs were related to those of medicine, transportation, and absenteeism of the patients’ companions due to patient care.

Considering that the major contributor in the direct medical cost of treating psoriasis patients was related to medicine, designing appropriate mechanisms for insurance coverage, and allocating government subsidies for the purchase of medicine, are suggested.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Notes

  1. The cost of visit was explained in the footnote of Table 2

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global report on psoriasis. World Health Organization; 2016. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/204417/9789241565189_eng.pdf?sequence=1.

  2. Nair PA, Badri T. Psoriasis. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.

  3. Rajguru JP, Maya D, Kumar D, Suri P, Bhardwaj S, Patel ND. Update on psoriasis: a review. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(1):20–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kerkhof Pvd, Nestle FO. Psoriasis. In: Dermatology e-book. 1. 3 ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012.

  5. Walter K. Psoriasis. JAMA. 2022;327(19):1936.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Damiani G, Bragazzi NL, Karimkhani Aksut C, Wu D, Alicandro G, McGonagle D, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of psoriasis: results and insights from the global burden of disease 2019 study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:743180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. International Federation of Psoriasis Associations, International League of Dermatological Societies, International Psoriasis Council. Prevalence heat map. Global Psoriasis Atlas; 2021–23. Available from: https://www.globalpsoriasisatlas.org/en/explore/prevalence-heatmap?metric=overall.

  8. Parisi R, Iskandar IY, Kontopantelis E, Augustin M, Griffiths CE, Ashcroft DM. National, regional, and worldwide epidemiology of psoriasis: systematic analysis and modeling study. BMJ. 2020;369:m1590.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Brezinski EA, Dhillon JS, Armstrong AW. Economic burden of psoriasis in the United States: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(6):651–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lopes N, Dias LLS, Azulay-Abulafia L, Oyafuso LKM, Suarez MV, Fabricio L, et al. Humanistic and economic impact of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in Brazil. Adv Ther (Weinh). 2019;36(10):2849–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Svedbom A, Dahlén J, Mamolo C, Cappelleri JC, Mallbris L, Petersson IF, et al. Economic burden of psoriasis and potential cost offsets with biologic treatment: a Swedish register analysis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2016;96(5):651–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Azizam N, Saperi S, Aniza I, Norazirah M, Azura M, Zafar A, et al. Cost analysis of psoriasis treatment modalities in Malaysian public hospitals. Med Health. 2019;14(1):23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zarei E, Gholamhosseini A, Ghandi N. Estimation of direct and indirect costs of one-year treatment for psoriasis outpatients in Iran: a study in Razi hospital in 2017–2018. Dermatol Cosmet. 2021;12(3):164–79.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Avazeh Y, Rezaei S, Bastani P, Mehralian G. Health literacy and medication adherence in psoriasis patients: a survey in Iran. BMC Prim Care. 2022;23(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bloom DE, Chen S, Kuhn M, McGovern ME, Oxley L, Prettner K. The economic burden of chronic diseases: estimates and projections for China, Japan, and South Korea. J Econ Ageing. 2020;17:100163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ipinnimo TM, Elegbede OE, Durowade KA, Adewoye KR, Ibirongbe DO, Ajayi PO, et al. Cost of illness of non-communicable diseases in private and public health facilities in Nigeria: a qualitative and quantitative approach. Pan Afr Med J. 2023;44:6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tarricone R. Cost-of-illness analysis: what room in health economics? Health Policy. 2006;77(1):51–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jo C. Cost-of-illness studies: concepts, scopes, and methods. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2014;20(4):327–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee KS. A tool for communication with decision-makers: limitations and utilization of studies on cost of illness. Korean J Hepatol. 2011;17(4):258–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. García-Pérez L, Linertová R, Valcárcel-Nazco C, Posada M, Gorostiza I, Serrano-Aguilar P. Cost-of-illness studies in rare diseases: a scoping review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16(1):178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Seyedrezazadeh E, Gilani N, Ansarin K, Yousefi M, Sharifi A, Jafari Rouhi AH, et al. Economic burden of asthma in northwest Iran. Iran J Med Sci. 2023;48(2):156–66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Aoun M, Helou E, Sleilaty G, Zeenny RM, Chelala D. Cost of illness of chronic kidney disease in Lebanon: from the societal and third-party payer perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):586.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Tekin RN, Şahin B. Comparison of top-down and bottom up cost approaches in colon and rectal cancer treatment. Health. 2021;13(02):90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Central Bank of Islamic Republic of Iran. Foreign exchange rates. Central Bank of IRI; 2022. Available from: https://cbi.ir/ExRates/rates_en.aspx.

  25. Van den Hout W. The value of productivity: human-capital versus friction-cost method. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(Suppl 1):i89–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ministry of Cooperatives Labor and Social Welfare Islamic Republic of Iran. Circular. Ministry of Cooperatives Labor and Social Welfare of IRI; 2022. Available from: https://www.mcls.gov.ir/icm_content/media/image/2022/03/527670_orig.pdf.

  27. Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Excel. 2016. Retrieved from https://office.microsoft.com/excel.

  28. Min S, Wang D, Xia J, Lin X, Jiang G. The economic burden and quality of life of patients with psoriasis treated with biologics in China. J Dermatolog Treat. 2023;34(1):2247106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Steinke SI, Peitsch WK, Ludwig A, Goebeler M. Cost-of-illness in psoriasis: comparing inpatient and outpatient therapy. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e78152.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Moradi M. Health-related quality of life and disease burden of psoriasis in Iran [Ph.D. Thesis]. CORVINUS University of Budapest; 2017.

  31. Amiri R, Mohamadi S, Khalili M, Fatehi A, Sabermahany A, Aflatoonian M. Teatment costs of patients admitted in dermatologic ward of Afzalipour hospital, Kerman. J Dermatol Cosmet. 2021;12(1):37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Löfvendahl S, Norlin JM, Schmitt-Egenolf M. Economic burden of generalized pustular psoriasis in Sweden: a population-based register study. Psoriasis (Auckl). 2022;12:89–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Levy AR, Davie AM, Brazier NC, Jivraj F, Albrecht LE, Gratton D, et al. Economic burden of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in Canada. Int J Dermatol. 2012;51(12):1432–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mustonen A, Mattila K, Leino M, Koulu L, Tuominen R. Psoriasis causes significant economic burden to patients. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2014;4(1):115–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Badie S, Nasr T. Investigating and analyzing the accommodation of patient companions in Shiraz hospitals with the attitude of reducing companionship. In: National technology conference in applied engineering. Tehran; 2017.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The researchers would like to thank the studied patients and their companions for their kind cooperation with the researchers in collecting and analyzing the data.

Funding

The present article was extracted from the thesis written by Moslem Mirzaei and was financially supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences grant No. 27842.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AJ, RR, and MGh contributed to the idea and design. MM contributed to the data collection. All authors contributed to the data analysis. All authors contributed to the manuscript writing and revision. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdosaleh Jafari.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present research was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Code: IR.SUMS.NUMIMG.REC.1402.010). The patients were free to choose to participate in the study; the research objectives were explained to them and their informed consent was obtained. The data collection forms were completed anonymously, and the patients were assured of the confidentiality of their answers. In order to comply with ethical considerations and the confidentiality of the patients’ information, they were distinguished by the codes at the top of the data collection form.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ravangard, R., Mirzaei, M., Ghahartars, M. et al. Economic burden of psoriasis in Southern Iran in 2022. Arch Public Health 82, 104 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01332-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01332-2

Keywords