Skip to main content

Prevalence and factors associated with adolescent pregnancies in Zambia: a systematic review from 2000–2022



Adolescent pregnancy increases risk of short- and long-term adverse social and health outcomes for the adolescent mother and child. Zambia has high prevalence rates of adolescent pregnancy. However, the risk factors are varied and in need of further review and research. The study accordingly reviewed the prevalence and factors associated with adolescent pregnancy in Zambia.


This systematic review was conducted following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The review included original peer-reviewed research articles published from 2000 onwards in English, retrieved from Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and African Journals Online databases. Thematic synthesis was used in the analysis of the data extracted from the included studies.


Six research studies carried out in Zambia (two quantitative, two qualitative, and two mixed methods) were reviewed and included. Prevalence of adolescent pregnancy in Zambia ranged from 29 to 48%. Additionally, it was found that 29.1% of the country’s adolescents, nationally, had given birth as of 2018. Factors at an individual’s level such as early or child marriage, exposure to media, knowledge about sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and contraception, contraceptive use, as well as risky sexual behaviours were found to be significantly associated with adolescent pregnancy. Peer pressure, educational attainment, household wealth, and the power dynamics of the household head were identified as the major socio-economic factors alongside socio-cultural, gender and sexual norms amongst other environmental and contextual factors. Policy level factors identified were lack and limited access to SRH information and services by adolescents, including an enabling legal environment.


From the review, it was abundantly clear that a combination of individual, interpersonal, environmental, and an enabling legal/policy level factors significantly contribute to the high levels of adolescent pregnancy. There is a paucity of empirical research on the prevalence and determinants of adolescent pregnancy, which suggests an imperative need for large multi-site mixed methods studies to properly explore these and other determinants on a national scale, as well as the long-term implications of these pregnancies on adolescent mothers and babies. Multifaceted and multisectoral interventions which include improved access to education, economic empowerment, addressing gender and socio-cultural norms, should be implemented having due regard to the socio-cultural context which should ride on strong political will, failing which adolescent girls in Zambia will definitely be left behind.

Plain English summary

Pregnancy increases risk of adverse short- and long-term outcomes for adolescent mothers and their babies. Adolescent pregnancy is significantly high in Zambia. However, the risk factors are varied and in need of further review and research. Using a systematic review process, we identify the trends and factors that influence adolescent pregnancy in Zambia from research articles published since 2000. We found that prevalence of adolescent pregnancy in Zambia was between 29%-48% and that nationally, 29.1% of the country’s adolescents had given birth as of 2018. Factors identified as influencing adolescent pregnancy in Zambia were analysed at four levels: 1) individual factors such as early or child marriage, exposure to media, knowledge about sexual and reproductive health and contraception, contraceptive use, as well as risky sexual behaviours; 2) interpersonal level factors such as peer pressure, educational attainment, household wealth, influence of male or female headed households, and family members; 3) community/environmental factors such as socio-cultural, gender and sexual norms; and 4) an enabling policy/legal environment covering mostly access to SRH information and services. It was emphasized that various stakeholders should deliberately collaborate to address these issues at all four levels using interventions that are socio-culturally suitable and should be supported by strong political will at policy and implementation levels to facilitate better access to education, improve economic empowerment of girls, review of gender and dysfunctional cultural norms and practices, amongst other considerations.

Peer Review reports


Adolescence is the transitional period from childhood to adulthood, accompanied by physical, psychological and emotional changes [1, 2]. Young girls often transition from childhood to adulthood with the onset of menarche, which marks the beginning of the initiation process in readiness for marriage [3, 4] among certain cultures in Zambia. During this period, many young people begin experimenting and engaging in sexual activities. Adolescent pregnancy, defined as pregnancy in girls aged between 10 and 19 years of age [5] is often an unfortunate offshoot of such sexual experimentation.

Adolescent pregnancy remains a key public health and development concern globally, especially in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICS). It is estimated that approximately 16 million girls aged 15–19 years, as well as an additional one (1) million below 15 years, give birth in LMICs [5]. Adolescent pregnancy has detrimental and far-reaching consequences for the majority of adolescent girls – for the rest of their lives –as it perpetuates poverty, deprives them of education, increases health risks and girl-child vulnerabilities while at the same time putting them in harm’s way and exposing them to violence [6]. In the result, adolescent pregnancy may have negative and unintended knock-on effects on many Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including; goal one (ensuring no poverty), goal two (zero hunger), goal three (good health and wellbeing including sexual and reproductive health), goal four (access to quality education), goal five (gender equality), and goal ten (reduction of inequality) [7].

The prevalence of adolescent pregnancy in Africa remains rather unacceptably high. For instance, a recent systematic review indicated that the prevalence of adolescent pregnancy was 18.8% in Africa as a whole, and 19.3% in sub-Saharan Africa [8]. Zambia, as indicated below, undoubtedly has one of the highest adolescent pregnancy prevalence rates in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), conceivably with a significant attenuating effect on socio-economic development, riding on the fact that adolescents are a significant age group constituting 24% of the total population of Zambia [9]. Over the last five years, the rate of adolescent pregnancy has remained very high at 29.2%, with at least 35% of young girls in rural areas giving birth before, or by, the age of 18 years according to the 2018 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (ZDHS) [10]. There are significant rural–urban variations in adolescent pregnancies in Zambia, with rural areas having an average of 37% compared to 17% in urban areas [10]. These averages potentially mask realities on the ground as some rural areas have adolescent pregnancy rates as high as 42.5% and 39.5% in Southern and Eastern Provinces respectively. Adolescent pregnancy is partly responsible for the high total fertility rate of 4.7 per woman and rapid population growth rate of 2.8% thus contributing about 20% of the total fertility rate [11].

Child marriages deprive adolescent girls of their sexual and reproductive health rights and curtails opportunities for them to realize their full potential and enjoyment of human rights entitlements as enshrined in various international treaties [6]. Child marriage prevalence in Zambia is one of the highest in the world, reducing marginally from 31.7% in 2014 to 29% in 2018 [12]. It is reported that 16.5% of girls aged 15–19 are married, while 31.4% of those aged 20–24 years got married before the age of 18 [13]. Major drivers of child marriage in Zambia include high poverty levels, limited access to quality education, limited life choices, and poor access to sexual and reproductive health services [14]. It is culturally accepted for marriages to take place between adolescents, to have intergenerational marriages, marriages of rectification of ‘shameful or dishonourable situations such as teenage pregnancy [6]. It has also been demonstrated that in some African patriarchal societies, power dynamics at play tend to reinforce child marriages [15, 16]. In order to protect girls’ rights and achieve progress towards national development, the Zambian government has prioritized ending child marriages through legal interventions and campaigns [6] anchored on the power of incumbency as the President of Zambia, H.E Hakainde Hichelema is the current African Union champion on ending child marriages.

The factors pertaining to poignant issues of adolescent pregnancy in Zambia are multifaceted, which suggests the need for multisector interventions to ameliorate the prevailing challenges, Unravelling and understanding these factors is key to the design and implementation of policies and interventions aimed at curbing adolescent pregnancy. This review aimed to assess the prevalence of adolescent pregnancy with recourse to Bronfenbrenner’s Socio-ecological Model (SEM) as the main conduit towards systematically identifying critical factors impacting adolescent pregnancy. The SEM is a pivotal theoretical framework which anchors robust examinations, investigations and research endeavours prescribed by the multiple factors at different sociodemographic levels that are associated with adolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH).


Study design and search strategy

This systematic review was conducted following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines [17]. We combined text words and medical subject headings such as pregnancy OR birth OR delivery with adolescent OR teen to search Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and African Journals Online from the database inception to 10 October 2021. The reference lists of eligible full texts were hand searched to retrieve articles missed during the search.

Study selection

Primary studies (both qualitative and quantitative) that reported, or contained relevant data, on the prevalence and factors associated with adolescent pregnancy in Zambia were considered for inclusion in this review. The study excluded reviews, editorials, case reports, and case series with fewer than 30 participants. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are presented in Table 1. We exported citations retrieved from database searches to EndNote X9 for removal of duplicates, and the (re)-duplicated records were uploaded to Rayyan QCRI for screening based on title and abstract.

Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Outcome measure

Adolescent pregnancy was defined as pregnancy or childbirth occurring in women less than 20 years old. This included self-report or evidence (record) of childbirth at a health facility by women aged less than 20 years. The prevalence of adolescent pregnancy was calculated as the number of women who become pregnant or had a child while they were less than 20 years old.

The second outcome of this study focused on factors influencing adolescent pregnancy. Factors associated with adolescent pregnancy, in the quantitative study conducted, were determined from the p-value less than 0.05 for the statistic from the final inferential analysis carried out. Themes related to factors with a bearing to adolescent pregnancy identified from the findings of the included qualitative studies were collated.

Quality assessment and risk of bias

Quality assessment of the six (6) papers was carried out using Sirriyeh et al.’s tool for quality assessment of studies with diverse designs (QATSDD) [18]. The use of this tool also allows for comparisons of the qualities of quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods papers within the same domain field of study. Two authors (FIS and LEB) independently assessed the included studies and where disagreements were encountered, a third author resolved this through a third assessment informed by discussions held. The tool awards quality score on a four-point scale from 0 to 3 with accompanying guidance notes for using the scoring criteria (qualitative study (14), quantitative study (14), and mixed methods (16)) [18]. The criteria included a theoretical framework, a statement of aims and objectives, a description of the research setting, sample size in relation to analysis, representativeness, sample size, data collection procedures, rationale for choice of data collection tool, recruitment data, statistical assessment of reliability and validity of tool (quantitative only), fitness between stated research question and method of data collection (quantitative only), stated research question and format and content of data collection tool (qualitative only), stated research question and method of analysis, justification for selected analytical method, reliability of analytical process assessment (qualitative only), and user involvement in design, and discussion of strengths and limitations [18].

Each research paper was awarded a score per criterion and index scores generated. The total quality scores of the included studies were computed in percentage using the expected total scores (42 for quantitative and qualitative studies and 48 for mixed methods studies). Percentage scores greater than 50% were designated as high while those less than or equal to 50% were graded low-quality.

Data extraction and analysis

Two authors independently extracted data on the surname of the first author, year of publication, and determinants of adolescent pregnancy. The data extraction tool contained information on the author and year of publication, study aim, study design, study area and province, sample size, study population, and factors associated with adolescent pregnancy. A thematic synthesis was adopted in this review. The analysis of the factors influencing adolescent pregnancy was based on themes from the SEM. As such the themes for determinants of influence on adolescent pregnancy were categorized into individual (for example, exposure to media, and knowledge on use of contraceptives), interpersonal/socio-economic (for example, educational status, household wealth), and policy /legal framework (for example, knowledge of and access to sexual reproductive health services) factors. Bronfenbrenner’s model is used because it allows for an assessment of all possible factors that contribute to a phenomenon, addressing the issue as resulting from influences of multifaceted and multilevel factors [19].


Search results

A total of 3,452 papers were initially accessed from various electronic database searches and digital library catalogues, however 2,665 research had to be eliminated since they were duplicates. The remaining articles’ titles and abstracts were then evaluated, and 504 studies were reviewed and removed because they were not germane to the study. On the basis of the established inclusion and exclusion criteria, the eligibility of the remaining five (5) full-text publications was assessed. From snowballing through references of eligible articles, one (1) study was further assessed and included. Thus, in the final analysis, only the six papers that met the eligibility requirements were included (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow of the search strategy

Overview of included studies

Of the 6 studies retained in the final review, two (2) were qualitative, two (2) were mixed methods and two (2) were cross-sectional. The studies were carried out in the following Provinces of Zambia: Southern (2), Central (2), Eastern (1), North-Western, as well as in Lusaka (2) and Copperbelt (1) while two used national-level data from the Zambia Demographic and Health Surveys (ZDHS). All the six studies in the provinces showed high quality ranging from lowest 54.7% [20] and 76.2% [21] (Table 2). Guided by Wado et al.’s [21] study, all the five did not have explicit theoretical frameworks. Additionally, all the six studies did not provide any justification for the choice of data collection tools and all the quantitative and mixed methods studies did not assess statistical reliability and validity of the tools, which could be due to the use of secondary data for some of the studies [21, 22]. Such studies did not select the data collection tools and conducted their own data collection. With the exception of Svanemyr’s [23] study, all the other studies did not have user involvement in the study’s design.

Table 2 Quality assessment of included studies using the QATSDD

Prevalence of adolescent pregnancy in Zambia

The prevalence of adolescent pregnancy ranged from 29% in the study using the 2014 ZDHS [21] to 48% in a study in Petauke, Chadiza, and Katete districts in Eastern province [24]. Additionally, prevalence of adolescent motherhood ranged from 20.81% in the Zambezi district, North-Western province [26] to 23.1% in the study using 2014 ZDHS data [22].

The prevalence of adolescent pregnancy in Zambia continues on an upward trajectory according to Zambia’s recent Demographic and Health Surveys. For instance, the total adolescent pregnancy rate declined from 33.8% in 1992 to 30.7% in 1996, then increased to 31.6% in 2002. Table 3 shows an increase from 28.5% in 2014 to 29.2% in 2018 [10]. The Southern (42.5%), Western (41.2%), Eastern (39.5%), North Western (35.7%), and Central (30.6%) provinces recorded higher prevalence than the national average [10].

Table 3 Teenagers pregnancy or childbearing in Zambia 1992–2018

Prevalence was also observed to be positively correlated with increasing age, occasioning a distinct possibility of increasing vulnerability to risky sexual behaviours on the part of adolescents [1]. We observed a high prevalence among those in rural areas compared to those in urban areas which is indicative of rural–urban disparities from 1992 to 2018. Adolescents in urban areas may have access to improve economic opportunities and social services including SRH services and information compared to those in rural settings.

Also, prevalence of adolescent pregnancy was observed to have decreased with increasing levels of education with the trend showing increasing pregnancy for adolescents with primary and secondary education from 1992 to 2018 and decreasing for those with no formal education (Table 3). The level of education is a key determinant of adolescent pregnancy, with prevalence decreasing with increasing level of education. It is, however, a matter of concern that between 1992 and 2018, the teenage pregnancy rates among students in secondary school remained fairly constant (21.2% in 1992 and 22.2% in 2018). It might be of interest to understand reasons for this stagnation, as well as the comprehensive sexuality education packages in schools. This means that increasing access to education at all levels will help limit adolescent pregnancy [23].

Factors associated with adolescent pregnancy in Zambia

Of the six papers selected, varying associated factors were identified. These factors are consistent with the individual, socio-economic, environmental, and policy levels of the SEM (Table 4).

Table 4 Factors influencing adolescent pregnancy in Zambia

Bronfenbrenner’s [19] socio-ecological model/framework posits a multiplicity of factors associated with adolescent pregnancy operationalize at four levels: the individual (microsystem); interpersonal (mesosystem); environmental (ecosystem) and policy level (macrosystem).This model offers explanations regarding the influence of social environments on human development and provision of health services to guide the research effort focusing on key actors/variables which include: age, sex, gender issues, employment status, residence, religion, early marriage, poverty, education level, peer pressure, coercive sexual relations, comprehensive sexuality education, access to sexual and reproductive health services including use contraceptives.

At the Microsystem (individual) level of influence, the adolescent is the main centre of focus in terms of factors affecting responses advocating refraining from indulging in risky sexual behaviours, including having multiple sexual partners. Menon et al. and Wood et al. [24, 27] attest, through various studies carried out, that risky sexual behaviour can be construed as a function of age at sexual debut [21, 24], exposure to media [21], knowledge of sexuality and reproduction [23], knowledge of contraception [22, 24], contraceptive use [22, 24], risky sexual behaviours (transactional sex [25], multiple sexual partners [25], child marriage [24], low levels of education, attitude/ perceptions by the adolescent as well as poverty in the household to which the individual belongs.

At the Mesosystem (interpersonal/socio-economic) level of influence, the individual’s disposition towards sexual behaviour is mostly influenced by close family members without ruling out other factors/variables such as educational attainment [20,21,22,23], marital status [22], household wealth/poverty [20, 22,23,24, 26], peer pressure [23], and relationship to household head [21]. Low household wealth was a major factor identified in many studies [21, 22, 24]. The studies reported that low household economic status increases the risk of adolescent pregnancy with adolescents from the wealthiest households being protected from adolescent pregnancy. Menon et al. note that nationally, household poverty increases the risk of pregnancy among adolescents in Zambia using the 2014 ZDHS data [24].

It was also reported that major factors to adolescent pregnancy at the socio-economic factors were peer pressure [23] and relationship to household head (spouse) [21]. The researchers noted that adolescents who were spouses to the household head were more likely to get pregnant (OR = 14.79, 95%CI = 11.55–8.63) [21]. This however begs the question pertaining to the period the adolescent became pregnant as it is not abundantly clear whether conception occurred before or after marriage to the household head (presumably male-headed household).

Ecosystem (Community/Societal) level factors for adolescent pregnancy were also reported. Key at this level of influence, are neighbours, family and friends who potentially can influence an adolescent to be favourably disposed towards a certain trajectory. It is also at this level, that differences in prevalence rates become glaring as reported by Menon et al. [24]. These were socio-cultural, gender and sexual norms [21, 22] which encouraged early or child marriage, early sexual initiation, unprotected sex, and barriers to accessing sexual and reproductive health information and services. For instance, Svanemyr observes that socio-cultural norms about the use of contraceptive increases the risk of adolescent pregnancy in Zambia [23].

The Macrosystem (Policy/Legal) level of influence can be considered to be the most influential factor as enshrined in legal statutes which have force and effect of law, as attested for instance, by regulatory and policy framework on early marriages. Policy level factors comprised limited accessibility to SRH information and SRH services, including laws which prohibit adolescents from accessing SRH services including contraceptives [24]. The authors observed that due to limited access to sexual and reproductive health information and services many adolescents in Zambia are at risk of unplanned pregnancies.


Given the above contextual background the review then assessed the prevalence and factors influencing adolescent pregnancy in Zambia. It showed that prevalence of adolescent pregnancy varied between provinces as well as nationally. The factors may be categorized as being individual, socio-economic, environmental, and policy level factors.

Prevalence of adolescent pregnancy

The review revealed a significantly high prevalence of adolescent pregnancy ranging from 29% nationally [21] to 48% in the Eastern and Southern provinces [24]. Some of the studies [21, 22] also assessed adolescent motherhood, which presents as a limitation to capturing the magnitude of the problem, since this approach does not cover adolescents who may have lost pregnancy due to induced abortion or miscarriage. Nevertheless, this prevalence is in tandem with the high prevalence of the national adolescent pregnancy reported in the 2018 ZDHS [10]. It is important to understand the context-specific drivers of adolescent pregnancy in the country. One way could be through carrying out robust country-wide studies to allow for comparisons. This would address information gaps relating to possible ineffective or weak implementation of existing policies and interventions instituted to address the problem [28,29,30].

Individual level factors

This review showed that low level exposure to media is a factor significantly impacting adolescent pregnancy in Zambia. Exposure to various media platforms provides SRH information to young people [31, 32], and in some cases, a useful source of information on where to obtain SRH services including contraceptives and abortion services, hence contributing to the removal of some existing barriers to accessing SRH care. Further, exposure to the media has been found to trigger discussions about ASRH issues in addition to encouraging adolescents to utilize SRH youth reproductive and family planning services [33]. Exposure to mass media, can greatly influence adolescents’ attitudes, social expectations and avoidance of risky sexual behaviours thereby reducing risk of pregnancy [31].

Insufficient knowledge about sexual and reproductive health has been noted to increase the risk of adolescent pregnancy in Zambia. This is in line with the findings of many studies carried out in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [34,35,36,37,38]. Lack of knowledge about SRH issues indicates prevalence of poor safe sexual practices including contraceptive use and STIs prevention. As such, age-appropriate sexual health education programmes for adolescents are key to developing safe SRH as well as preventing adolescent pregnancy [39].

Early or child marriage was noted to be another a factor impacting Zambia’s adolescent pregnancy as attested by similar findings in previous studies across Africa pointing out the influential role of socio-cultural norms and practices in most developing countries [3, 4, 39]. Child marriage is still prevalent across Africa despite most countries having laws prohibiting and criminalizing marriage before the age of 18 years which might be due to sporadic or total lack of enforcement of these laws with no sanctions when they are routinely violated [40].

It is common cause that risky sexual behaviours among most adolescents have been reported as factors that increase the risk of adolescent pregnancy [27, 41]. Frequent sexual activity at an early age, multiple sexual partners, transactional and unprotected sex are common among adolescents and young people. Such risky sexual behaviours can be attributed, amongst other factors, to household poverty levels as noted in many studies [27, 41, 42]. In fact, a number of studies have reported a tendency among some adolescent girls to use sexual relationships with older men to cater for some of their financial needs [41, 42]. Early sexual initiation and lack of contraceptives as factors impacting adolescent pregnancy, as reported elsewhere in this review, is corroborated by findings from previous studies [3, 43]. In contrast, Worku et al.’s study indicated that contraceptive use among adolescents tends to increase the risk of adolescent pregnancy [44]. This could be explained as result of failed contraceptive failure due to poor knowledge on its correct use.

Interpersonal/socio-economic level factors

This review also accentuates the importance of two main interpersonal level factors, namely, peer pressure and relationship to household head. At the interpersonal level, supportive relationships that reinforce positive sexual and reproductive health behaviours among adolescents such as family influence, have an impact on the sexual and reproductive health vulnerabilities and experiences of adolescents [45]. Peer pressure as a major factor contributing to adolescent pregnancy has been reported in many other studies in Africa [46,47,48]. It has been established that peer groups play a significant role as agents of socialization which often influences lifestyle choices including sexual behaviours of teenagers. Pressure from this group may be so overwhelming to an extent that teenagers tend to conform to the sexual behaviour norms considered acceptable to their peer group [49].

Regarding the finding that relationship with household head is associated with adolescent pregnancy, this is not inconsistent with the findings by Worku et al. where relation to household head was significantly associated with teenage pregnancy in East Africa [44]. This could be attributed to the fact that some of the adolescents are married to the household head which increases their likelihood of becoming pregnant as wedded adolescents, a fact also identified by Wado et al. [21]. It is worth noting that teenage pregnancy mostly precedes the marriage. This is specially the case in most developing countries where sometimes entering into marriage is occasioned by unplanned pregnancy [50, 51].

Additionally, low level educational attainments were associated with increased risk of adolescent pregnancy in Zambia. This finding resonates well with those of other similar studies which report that low educational expectations and school dropouts are common factors for adolescent pregnancy [8, 43, 52,53,54]. Studies have found a link between the number of years spent in school and modern contraceptive use with more years associated with higher chances of using modern contraceptives [55,56,57,58,59]. In addition, educational attainment and adolescent pregnancy are interconnected such that while low educational attainment increases risk of adolescent pregnancy, unplanned pregnancy often truncates education for most adolescent girls. This could be attributed to the fact that education empowers adolescent girls regarding their sexual relationships and safe sex practices [60].

Low socio-economic status in the form of poor household wealth, poverty, and lack of resources tend to have a direct and high impact on the risk of adolescent pregnancy. Several studies have indicated that low family incomes increase the risk of adolescent pregnancy [38, 42]. These studies further observed that adolescent girls engaged in sexual relations with men in exchange for gifts and money or in return for financial support for their needs including but not limited to basic necessities such as sanitary pads and school fees [61, 62]. It can be noted that household poverty potentially increases the vulnerability of adolescent girls due to the need to meet some basic necessities. This may be construed as explaining the use of transactional sex as an economic survival strategy by young girls from households with high poverty levels risking pregnancy at a younger age [63].

Environmental level factors

The finding that existing socio-cultural, gender and sexual norms in Zambia are linked to increased risk of adolescent pregnancy is supported by many other studies [35, 37, 64, 65]. For instance, on cultural beliefs, encouraging larger families and early childbearing, Ayele et al. and Kaphagawani and Kalipeni reported that the prevailing cultural norms of marrying off young girls once they reach puberty leads to adolescent pregnancy [3, 4]. Studies have also found that being a spouse was a significant predictor of adolescent pregnancy [4, 44, 54]. These norms may contribute to adolescent girls seeing unplanned pregnancies as normal and socially accepted.

Similarly, norms governing contraceptive use were found to be a factor in adolescent pregnancy. Community-wide negative perceptions and beliefs regarding modern contraceptives was noted to be a common predictor of adolescent pregnancy in previous studies [66,67,68,69]. These norms lead to the unacceptability and non-use of modern contraceptives among adolescents. In some cases, parents and guardians do not support the provision of contraceptive services to adolescents hence recommendations have been made to engage and persuade key community gatekeepers such as religious leaders and chiefs to generate wider community support [66, 70]. In this regard, Svanemyr et al. contend that as part of efforts to reduce environmental level factors, positive social norms and community support need to be enabled for adolescents to practice safer sexual behaviours and have increased access to SRH information and services [45].

Policy/legal level factors

In addition to the above-mentioned factors, limited access to SRH information and services was identified as a policy/legal level factor for adolescent pregnancy in Zambia. Other studies in LMICs have also reported that lack of SRH service increases the risk of adolescent pregnancy [71,72,73]. Such a situation hinders adolescents from receiving much-needed SRH information, counselling and contraceptive services [71], against a background where the unmet need for contraceptives alone is considerably high in LMICs [74]. At the policy level, embedded provisions in some laws and policies related to the health, socio-economic, educational sectors and broad societal norms may hinder access to SRH and adolescents’ enjoyment of their human rights and freedoms [45]. In Zambia, adolescents below 16 years of age require parental/guardian consent to access SRH services, especially contraceptives.

The factors identified in this review suggest that the factors associated with adolescent pregnancy are varied but multifaceted and interconnected. There was more evidence about determinants of adolescent pregnancy in the individual and socio-economic levels compared to the environmental and policy levels. This indicates paucity of empirical evidence at these levels to support policy and intervention development and likely cause of the failure of some efforts to reduce the problem of teenage pregnancy. It thus shows that in designing interventions, little evidence from environmental and policy levels have been considered and incorporated. We did not observe any differences in the factors/levels identified in the literature based on the indicators of adolescent pregnancy measured by researchers (record of live birth or self-report). However, studies using primary data captured factors at more levels than those using secondary data.

Strengths and limitations

This systematic review presents findings of critical importance to the prevention of adolescent pregnancy in Zambia. However, the pulled studies do not cover all the regions, hence limiting the representativeness of the review findings to generalize on the whole country. In some of the included studies, adolescent motherhood was instead assessed as proxy to adolescent pregnancy. This presents as a limitation in capturing the magnitude of the problem since this approach does not cover adolescents who may have lost pregnancy due to induced abortion or miscarriage. In addition to this, the low number of studies included in the final review and the inclusion of various designs of studies that led to the heterogeneity which hindered the ability to perform a meta-analysis. In addition, there was no control over the data collection, cleaning and analysis of the studies considered in this study. There is however, merit on the integrity of the data and findings of the selected studies which are very germane and relevant to the prevention of adolescent pregnancy in Zambia and other SSA countries.


The prevalence of adolescent pregnancy in Zambia remains high and could be a major hindrance for the country to attain SDGs on health and wellbeing (SDG3) gender equality and women’s empowerment (SDG5) and decent work (SDG8) [7]. Numerous health interventions such as health education, skill-building, and increasing accessibility to contraceptives [75,76,77,78] including policies and legal frameworks have been implemented over the years to improve the health of young people and decrease adolescent pregnancy in the country [79]. Adolescent pregnancy however remains high. These interventions and policies are somewhat fragmented and not designed with multi-level and multi-sectoral connections. Thus, they may tend to overlook other aspects of the multifaceted factors being delivered or may serve to create other avenues which may mitigate against these efforts. Robust and nationally representative studies are needed to fill this lacuna.


Zambia’s high adolescent pregnancy rates were found to be associated with various individual, socio-economic, environmental, and policy level factors. This suggests that stakeholders need to consider a multilevel and multisectoral approach in addressing the challenge. There a is need to address the socio-cultural dimensions and foster political will in interventions, such as using incentives to stay in school, strategies to delay pregnancy and marriage, which include access to SRH information and services, use of positive deviant approaches in communities, policy/legal review, advocacy at policy level to end child marriages, investment in contraception, and access to adolescent friendly health care services.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. Nevertheless, the selected articles have all been listed in Table 2.


  1. Blakemore SJ, Burnett S, Dahl RE. The role of puberty in the developing adolescent brain. Human Brain Mapping. 2010;31(6):926–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sawyer SM, Afifi RA, Bearinger LH, Blakemore SJ, Dick B, Ezeh AC, Patton GC. Adolescence: a foundation for future health. The lancet. 2012;379(9826):1630–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaphagawani NC, Kalipeni E. Sociocultural factors contributing to teenage pregnancy in Zomba district. Malawi Glob Public Health. 2017;12(6):694–710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ayele BG, Gebregzabher TG, Hailu TT, Assefa BA. Determinants of teenage pregnancy in Degua Tembien District, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia: A community-based case-control study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7):e0200898.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organization. Adolescent pregnancy factsheet. 2014. Accessed from:

    Google Scholar 

  6. Population Council, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), Government of the Republic of Zambia. Child marriage in Zambia. Lusaka, Zambia: Population Council, UNFPA and Government of the Republic of Zambia. 2017.

  7. Osborn D, Cutter A, Ullah F. Universal sustainable development goals: Understanding the transformational challenge for developed countries. New York: Stakeholder Forum; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kassa GM, Arowojolu AO, Odukogbe AA, Yalew AW. Prevalence and determinants of adolescent pregnancy in Africa: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Reprod Health. 2018;15:195.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Central Statistical Office. 2010 census of population and housing: Population and demographic projections 2011–2035. Lusaka: Zambia Central Statistical Office; 2013.

  10. Central Statistical Office, Zambia Ministry of Health, ICF International. Zambia demographic and health survey: key indicators. Rockville, Maryland: ICF International; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zambia Statistics Agency, Ministry of Health (MOH) Zambia, ICF International. Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2018. Lusaka, Zambia, and Rockville, Maryland: Zambia Statistics Agency, Ministry of Health, and ICF; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  12. World Vision. A situation report on child marriages in Zambia. Accessed from on 10/01/2022.

  13. Central Statistical Office (CSO), Ministry of Health (MOH), ICF International. Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (ZDHS) 2013–2014. Rockville, Maryland, USA: ICF International; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Government of Zambia and United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF). Case study on ending child marriage in the Republic of Zambia. Lusaka: UNICEF; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Archambault CS. Ethnographic empathy and the social context of rights: “Rescuing” maasai girls from early marriage. Am Anthropol. 2011;113(4):632–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cislaghi B, Mackie G, Nkwi P, Shakya H. Social norms and child marriage in Cameroon: an application of the theory of normative spectrum. Glob Public Health. 2019;14(10):1479–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg. 2021;1(88):105906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sirriyeh R, Lawton R, Gardner P, Armitage G. Reviewing studies with diverse designs: The development and evaluation of a new tool. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(4):746–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bronfenbrenner U. Ecological models of human development. In: Gauvain M, Cole M, editors. Readings on the development of children. 2nd ed. New York, NY: WH Freeman; 1994. p. 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Blystad A, Moland KM, Munsaka E, Sandøy I, Zulu J. Vanilla bisquits and lobola bridewealth: parallel discourses on early pregnancy and schooling in rural Zambia. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1485):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wado YD, Sully EA, Mumah JN. Pregnancy and early motherhood among adolescents in five East African countries: A multi-level analysis of risk and protective factors. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(59):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Munakampe MN, Fwemba I, Zulu JM, Michelo C. Association between socioeconomic status and fertility among adolescents aged 15 to 19: an analysis of the 2013/2014 Zambia Demographic Health Survey (ZDHS). Reprod Health. 2021;18(182):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Svanemyr J. Adolescent pregnancy and social norms in Zambia. Cult Health Sex. 2019;22(6):615–29.

  24. Menon JA, Kusanthan T, Mwaba SOC, Juanoloa L, Kok MC. ‘Ring’ your future, without changing diaper –Can preventing teenage pregnancy address child marriage in Zambia? PLoS ONE. 2018;13(10):e0205523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Austrian K, Soler-Hampejsek E, Duby Z, Hewett PC. “When he asks for sex, you will never refuse”: Transactional sex and adolescent pregnancy in Zambia. Stud Fam Plann. 2019;50(3):243–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jere M. Adolescent fertility rates in a rural community in north-western Zambia: a retrospective study. Trop Doct. 2018;48(3):213–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wood L, Hendricks F. A participatory action research approach to developing youth-friendly strategies for the prevention of teenage pregnancy. Educ Action Res. 2017;25:103–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Accelerating progress toward the reduction of adolescent pregnancy in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, USA: PAHO, UNFPA and UNICEF; 2017

  29. Svanemvr J, Guijarro S, Butron Riveros B, Chandra-Mouli V. The health status of adolescents in Ecuador and the country’s response to the need for differentiated health care for adolescents. Reprod Health. 2017;14:29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Caffe S, Plesons M, Camacho AV, Brumana L, Abdool SN, Huaynoca S, Mayall K, Menard-Freeman L, de Francisco Serpa LA, Gomez Ponce de Leon R, Chandra-Mouli V. Looking back and moving forward: can we accelerate progress on adolescent pregnancy in the Americas? Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Asp G, Pettersson KO, Sandberg J, Kabakyenga J, Agardh A. Associations between mass media exposure and birth preparedness among women in southwestern Uganda: a community-based survey. Glob Health Action. 2014;7(1):22904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. World Health Organization. Generating demand and community support for sexual and reproductive health services for young people: a review of literature and programmes. Geneva: Department of Child and Adolescent Health and Development, WHO; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fatema K, Lariscy JT. Mass media exposure and maternal healthcare utilization in South Asia. SSM - Population Health. 2020;11:100614.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Beyene A, Muhiye A, Getachew Y, Hiruye A, Mariam DH, Derbew M, et al. Assessment of the magnitude of teenage pregnancy and its associated factors among teenage females visiting Assosa General Hospital. Ethiopian Med J. 2015;Suppl 2:25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Masemola-Yende JPF, Mataboge SM. Access to information and decision making on teenage pregnancy prevention by females in Tshwane. Curationis. 2015;38(2):1540.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kuyinu YA, Femi-Adebayo TT, Odugbemi BA, et al. Causative factors for sexual and reproductive health status of pregnant adolescent girls in urban communities of Lagos, Nigeria. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2017;32(2):20170104.

  37. Mchunu G, Peltzer K, Tutshana B, et al. Adolescent pregnancy and associated factors in South African youth. Afr Health Sci. 2012;12:426–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Mothiba TM, Maputle MS. Factors contributing to teenage pregnancy in the Capricorn district of the Limpopo Province. Curationis. 2012;35:19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Morhe ESK, Tagbor HK, Ankobea FK, et al. Reproductive experiences of teenagers in the Ejisu-Juabeng district of Ghana. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;118:137–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mackie G. Effective rule of law requires construction of a social norm of legal obedience. Chicago: University of Chicago Political Theory Workshop; 2012.

  41. Krugu JK, Mevissen FEF, Prinsen A, et al. Who’s that girl? A qualitative analysis of adolescent girls’ views on factors associated with teenage pregnancies in Bolgatanga, Ghana. Reprod Health. 2016;13:39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. McCleary-Sills J, Douglas Z, Rwehumbiza A, et al. Gendered norms, sexual exploitation and adolescent pregnancy in rural Tanzania. Reprod Health Matters. 2013;21:97–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Birhanu BE, Kebede DL, Kahsay AB, Belachew AB. Predictors of teenage pregnancy in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):601.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Worku MG, Tessema ZT, Teshale AB, Tesema GA, Yeshaw Y. Prevalence and associated factors of adolescent pregnancy (15–19 years) in East Africa: a multilevel analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:253.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Svanemyr J, Amin A, Robles OJ, Greene ME. Creating an enabling environment for adolescent sexual and reproductive health: a framework and promising approaches. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(1):S7-14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mushwana L, Monareng L, Richter S, Muller H. Factors influencing the adolescent pregnancy rate in the Greater Giyani municipality, Limpopo Province - South Africa. Int J Afr Nurs Sci. 2015;2:10–8.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Yakubu I, Salisu WJ. Determinants of adolescent pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2018;15:15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Yidana A, Ziblim SD, Azongo TB, Abass YI. Socio-cultural determinants of contraceptives use among adolescents in northern Ghana. Public Health Res. 2015;5(4):83–9.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Isuku EJ. Peer pressure and teenage pregnancy among adolescent secondary schools girls in Ibadan Metropolis. Lagos Educ Rev. 2015;15(2):88–99.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Plan International. Teenage pregnancy and early marriage in Timor-Leste. 2017. Access from:

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zulu J, Krugu J, van Gurp M, Kok M. Prevention or punishment? Teenage pregnancy and child marriage in Chadiza and Petauke. Eastern Zambia: University of Zambia and KIT Royal Tropical Institute; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Timaeus IM, Moultrie TA. Teenage childbearing and educational attainment in South Africa. Stud Fam Plann. 2016;47:143–60.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Okigbo CC, Speizer IS. Determinants of sexual activity and pregnancy among unmarried young women in Urban Kenya: a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0129286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Brahmbhatt H, Kågesten A, Emerson M, Decker MR, Olumide AO, Ojengbede O, Lou C, Sonenstein FL, Blum RW, Delany-Moretlwe S. Prevalence and determinants of adolescent pregnancy in urban disadvantaged settings across five cities. J Adolesc Health. 2014;55(6):S48-57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Gakidou E, Cowling K, Lozano R, Murray CJ. Increased educational attainment and its effect on child mortality in 175 countries between 1970 and 2009: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2010;376:959–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Mmari K, Sabherwal S. A review of risk and protective factors for adolescent sexual and reproductive health in developing countries: an update. J Adolesc Health. 2013;53:562–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Grown C, Gupta G, Pande R. Taking action to improve women’s health through gender equality and women’s empowerment. Lancet. 2005;365:541–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Boyle MH, Racine Y, Georgiades K, et al. The influence of economic development level, household wealth and maternal education on child health in the developing world. Social Sci Med. 2006;63:2242–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Little AW, Green A. Successful globalisation, education and sustainable development. Int J Educ Dev. 2009;29:166–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Hargreaves J, Boler T. Girl power–The impact of girls. Education on HIV and sexual behaviour. London: ActionAid International; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Madise N, Zulu E, Ciera J. Is poverty a driver for risky sexual behaviour? Evidence from national surveys of adolescents in four African countries. Afr J Reprod Health. 2007;11:83–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Jewkes R, Morrell R. Sexuality and the limits of agency among South African teenage women: Theorising femininities and their connections to HIV risk practices. Social Sci Med. 2012;74:1729–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Odimegwu C, Mkwananzi S. Factors associated with teen pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-country cross-sectional study. Afr J Reprod Health. 2016;20(3):94–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Adongo BW. Assessing factors influencing early sexual initiation among adolescents (13 to 19 years) in Ghana: a qualitative study. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2018;11:53–60.

  65. Ochiogu IN, Miettola J, Ilika AL, et al. Impact of timing of sex education on teenage pregnancy in Nigeria: cross-sectional survey of secondary school students. J Community Health. 2011;36:375–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Denno DM, Hoopes AJ, Chandra-Mouli V. Effective strategies to provide adolescent sexual and reproductive health services and to increase demand and community support. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56:S22–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Ochako R, Mbondo M, Aloo S, et al. Barriers to modern contraceptive methods uptake among young women in Kenya: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Gueye A, Speizer IS, Corroon M, et al. Belief in family planning myths at the individual and community levels and modern contraceptive use in urban Africa. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015;41:191–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Ankomah A, Anyanti J, Oladosu M. Myths, misinformation, and communication about family planning and contraceptive use in Nigeria. Open Access J Contracept. 2011;2:95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Kesterton AJ, Cabral de Mello M. Generating demand and community support for sexual and reproductive health services for young people: a review of the literature and programs. Reprod Health. 2010;7:25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Chung HW, Kim EM, Lee J. Comprehensive understanding of risk and protective factors related to adolescent pregnancy in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. J Adolesc. 2018;69:180–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Miranda AE, Szwarcwald CL. Pregnancy rate and risk behaviors among female adolescents in Vitoria. Brazil Women & Health. 2007;45(3):17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Mkhwanazi N. Understanding teenage pregnancy in a post-apartheid South African township. Cult Health Sex. 2010;12(4):347–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Ahinkorah BO, Kang M, Perry L, Brroks F, Hayen A. Prevalence of first adolescent pregnancy and its associated factors in sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-country analysis. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(2):e0246308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Macleod CI. Expanding reproductive justice through a supportability reparative justice framework: the case of abortion in South Africa. Cult Health Sex. 2019;21(1):46–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Zulu JM, Sandøy IF, Moland KM, Musonda P, Munsaka E, Blystad A. The challenge of community engagement and informed consent in rural Zambia: an example from a pilot study. BMC Med Ethics. 2019;20(1):45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Zulu JM, Goicolea I, Kinsman J, Sandøy IF, Blystad A, Mulubwa C, Makasa MC, Michelo C, Musonda P, Hurtig AK. Community based interventions for strengthening adolescent sexual reproductive health and rights: how can they be integrated and sustained? A realist evaluation protocol from Zambia. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Chandra-Mouli V, Camacho AV, Michaud PA. WHO guidelines on preventing early pregnancy and poor reproductive outcomes among adolescents in developing countries. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(5):517–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Severin D. Zambia takes the lead on preventing early marriage and teenage pregnancy. 2015. Access from

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge the technical guidance of Dr. Valirie Agbor Ndip of the Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Unit in Nuffield Department of Population Health (NDPH), University of Oxford, UK.


No funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



All authors provided equal intellectual inputs to the paper, methodological rigor assessment of the included papers, and writing of the initial and final drafts of the paper. FIS and LEB conducted the quality assessment independently. All authors have accepted the submission of the current version of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farrukh Ishaque Saah.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malunga, G., Sangong, S., Saah, F.I. et al. Prevalence and factors associated with adolescent pregnancies in Zambia: a systematic review from 2000–2022. Arch Public Health 81, 27 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Adolescent pregnancy
  • Teenage
  • Sexual and reproductive health
  • Socio-ecological model
  • Zambia